Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Presented by:
B. S. Rumesh Fernando
118358 C
OVERVEIW
Research Background
Aim and Objectives
WH in Thermal Plants
Technology Selection
Modeling of ORC system
Analysis of ORC
Economic Evaluation
Conclusions
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES
Highlighting Point
If overall plant efficiencies increased by 1%, approximately Rs: 15 million
can be saved annually.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES Cont…
Aim
To investigate WHR potential in thermal plants; carryout
techno-economic feasibility analysis and evaluate viability of
implementation.
Objectives
To investigate WH opportunities of thermal plants in Sri
Lanka.
To analyses WHR methods and technologies.
To evaluate the viability of implementation, technically and
economically with appropriate recovery technologies.
WH in Thermal Plants
1 Expander
Analysis
Evaporator
- Varying the evaporator temperature
2
- Varying pressure ratio of the expander
4 Condenser
Pump
3
Combined graph on temperature analysis - Output
140
120
R 245fa
R 123
100
Toluene
Expander Work, (kW)
R 113
80
Benzene
60 R 245ca
Decane
40
R 134a
R 114
20
Pentane
0 Heptane
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
-20
40
η R245fa %
35 η R123 %
η Toluene %
η Organic Rankine Cycle, %
30
η R113 %
25 η Benzene %
η R 245ca %
20
η Decane %
15
η R 134a %
10 η R 114 %
η Pentane %
5
η Heptane %
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
100
120
140
0
20
40
60
80
20.22
20.43
27.34
26.07
2.82
13.75
Working Fluid
η cycle %
84.61
5
0
10
15
25
30
35
45
20
40
73.18
17.31
119.51
18.97
71.83
25.19
94.06
20.02
3.40
17.27
Working Fluid
28.91
25.02
40.29
26.41
33.51
Temp. Analysis – Output & Efficiency
Temp. Analysis – Working Fluid Operating Range
350
40
300
Temperature Range, (oC)
40
250 50
40
200
40
40
150 40
40
40
40
100
20
50
Here, working fluid operating range size is mentioned in middle of the blue colour column
Combined graph on pressure analysis - Output
120
R 245fa
100
R 123
Toluene
Expander Work Output, (kW)
80
R 113
Benzene
60 R 245ca
R 114
Pentane
40
Heptane
Decane
20
R 134a
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
35 η R 245fa %
η R 123 %
30
η Toluene %
Cycle Efficiency, η %
25 η R 113 %
η Benzene %
20
η R 245ca %
15 η Decane %
η R 134a %
10
η R 114 %
η Pentane %
5
η Heptane %
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
23.52
19.84
23.54
23.52
5.09
13.29
Working Fluid
77.49
η cycle %
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45 66.52
18.84
100.28
18.44
64.62
23.48
84.60
20.18
5.48
17.14
Working Fluid
28.08
23.94
38.12
25.15
32.19
Pressure Analysis – Output & Efficiency
Pressure Analysis – Working Fluid Operating Range
60
50
Expander Pressure, (bar)
40
26
30 20
18 18 20 14
16 16
12 10
20
6
10
Here, working fluid operating range size is mentioned in middle of the blue colour column
EONOMIC EVALUATION
Investment Criteria & Cost
Plants below 250kW - USD 2500 per kW
Plants above 250kW - USD 2200 per kW
Plants above 1MW - USD 1800 - 2000 per kW
Expected Estimated Investment Total
Waste Heat Recovery Organic
Electric Plant Capacity Cost (USD) Investment
Opportunity Fluid
Output (kW) (kW) per kW Rs.
NPV Calculations
Economic Evaluation Cont…
Evaluate the investment by NPV method with next 5
year income generation
WHR
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 Scenario 7
Opportunity
Sapugaskanda
Power Station
x √ √ x √ x √
Lakvijaya Coal
Plant
x √ √ x x x √
Jaffna Diesel
Plant
x x x x x x x
Kelevarapitiya
Plant
√ √ √ √ √ √ √
Kelanithissa GT
Plant
√ √ √ √ √ √ x
Lakvijaya
Blowdown
x x x x x x √
CONCLUSIONS
Theoretical Evaluation
- No ideal fluid (vary with T & P range)
- Optimum working fluid selecting depends on heat source
temperature
- Recommended to operate in Sub-critical region (Dry or
isentropic)
- In both analysis fluid Decane has show highest outputs
- Both analysis shows fluid R 134a not suitable
- Analysis shows, refrigerant fluids suitable below 200 oC,
organic fluids suitable higher than 200 oC
CONCLUSIONS Conts…
Economic Evaluation
- Sapugaskanda Plant
- Lakvijaya Plant Feasible for WHR
by ORC plant
- Lakvijaya Plant Blowdown
THANK YOU