Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
72%
66%
51%
38%
18%
9%
3%
Men Women
Years
*Residual lifetime risk of developing hypertension among people
with blood pressure <140/90 mmHg starting at age 55-65 years
Source: Vasan RS et al. JAMA 2002; 287:1003-1010
Change in Blood Pressure Levels in
the United States Over Time
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
age-adjusted percentage
Blood pressure
Obesity
Office BP >140/90 or 130/80 mm Hg in patients with DM Physical inactivity
or chronic kidney disease Excessive alcohol ingestion
and High salt, low fiber diet
Patient prescribed 3 or more antihypertensive
medications at optimal doses, including if possible a
diuretic
or
Office BP at goal but patient requiring 4 or more Discontinue/Minimize Interfering Substances
antihypertensive medications
CrCl=Creatinine clearance
Source: Calhoun DA et al. Circulation 2008;117:e510-526
High Blood Pressure Evidence:
Increased Risk with Increased Levels
Ischemic heart disease mortality and blood pressure
Age at Risk (Y) Age at Risk (Y)
80-89 80-89
Ischemic Heart Disease Mortality
256 256
32 50-59 32 50-59
16 40-49 16 40-49
8 8
4 4
2 2
1 1
0 0
120 140 160 180 70 80 90 100 110
Usual Systolic BP (mm Hg) Usual Diastolic BP (mm Hg)
BP=Blood pressure
Source: Prospective Studies Collaboration. Lancet 2002;360:1903-1913
High Blood Pressure Evidence:
Risk of CHD with Treatment
Lisinopril
fatal CHD
.12
16
Proportion with CV
12
Atenolol
8 Losartan
4
13% RRR, P=0.021
0
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66
Study Month
6
Nonfatal MI and
Atenolol-based regimen
fatal CHD (%)
4
Amlodipine-based regimen
2
RRR=10%, P=0.1052
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time since randomization (years)
0.14
revascularization (%)
arrest, and coronary
0.12
Benazepril/HCTZ
0.10
0.08
Benazepril/Amlodipine
0.06
0.04
0.02
20% RRR, HR=0.80, P=0.0002
0.00
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
P=0.02
Rate/1000 patient years (%)
P<0.001
Indapamide +
perindopril
Placebo
P=0.06
P=0.05 P<0.001
15
10
5
RR=0.98, P=0.57
0
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Months
Both a CAS and NCAS provide similar efficacy
*Trandolapril (up to 4 mg) was added in those with diabetes
mellitus, chronic kidney disease, or heart failure
BP=Blood pressure, CAS=Calcium antagonist strategy, HTN=Hypertension,
MI=Myocardial infarction, NCAS=Non-calcium antagonist strategy
Source: Pepine CJ et al. JAMA 2003;290:2805-2816
Blood Pressure Lowering Therapy Evidence:
Secondary Prevention
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use
Evaluation (VALUE) Trial
15,245 patients with untreated HTN and high CV risk randomized to a BP
lowering strategy with valsartan (160 mg) or amlodipine (10 mg) for 4.2 years
Primary cardiac composite endpoint
Cardiac mortality
Cardiac morbidity
All myocardial infarction
All congestive heart failure
All stroke
All-cause death
New-onset diabetes
0.5 1 2
Favors valsartan Favors amlodipine
Both blood pressure lowering regimens provide similar efficacy
0.25 130/78
Placebo Follow-up BP
CV event rate*
Enalapril
124/77
0.20 (mmHg)
Amlodipine 125/77
0.15
0.10
0.05
0
0 6 12 18 24
Months
Treatment with amlodipine results in reduced CV events
*Includes CV death, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, coronary
revascularization, hospitalization for heart failure or angina pectoris, stroke,
transient ischemic attack, development of peripheral arterial disease
BP=Blood pressure, CAD=Coronary artery disease,
CV=Cardiovascular, DBP=Diastolic blood pressure
Source: Nissen S et al. JAMA 2004;292:2217-2226
Blood Pressure Lowering Therapy Evidence:
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Control
Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Study
18,790 patients with a baseline diastolic BP of 100-115 mm Hg randomized
to a target diastolic BP of <90 mm Hg, <85 mm Hg, or <80 mm Hg
21 15 P=0.003
Incidence of LVH (%)
17.0
Composite of CV
events* (%)
14 10 9.4
11.4
4.8
7 5
0 0
Usual Control Tight Control Usual Control Tight Control
More intensive blood pressure control provides greater benefit
*Composite of death, MI, CVA, TIA, CHF, angina, new AF,
revascularization, aortic dissection, PAD, and ESRD
AF=Atrial fibrillation, ESRD=End stage renal disease, CHF=Congestive heart failure,
CVA=Cerebrovascular accident, LVH=Left ventricular hypertrophy, MI=Myocardial infarction,
PAD=Peripheral artery disease, SBP=Systolic blood pressure, TIA=Transient ischemic attack
Source: Verdecchia P et al. Lancet 2009;374:525-533
Blood Pressure Lowering Therapy Evidence:
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Control
International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST)—DM
Substudy
6,400 diabetic patients from the INVEST study grouped by tight (<130 mm Hg),
usual (>130 to <140 mm Hg), or uncontrolled (>140 mm Hg) blood pressure
HR=1.15, p=0.036
Total stroke
10 10
5 5
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Weight reduction Maintain normal body weight (BMI=18.5- 5-20 mmHg/10 kg weight
25) lost
DASH eating plan Diet rich in fruits, vegetables, low fat dairy 8-14 mmHg
and reduced in fat
Moderate alcohol <2 drinks/day for men and <1 drink/day 2-4 mmHg
for women
High CAD Risk Diuretic, BB, ACE-I, CCB ALLHAT, HOPE, ANBP2,
LIFE, CONVINCE
Diabetes Mellitus Diuretic, BB, ACE-I, NKF-ADA Guideline,
ARB, CCB UKPDS, ALLHAT
Not at goal BP
*Includes weight control, increased physical activity, alcohol moderation, sodium reduction, and
emphasis on increased consumption of fresh fruits, vegetables, and low-fat dairy products
AHA=American Heart Association, BP=Blood pressure,
CV=Cardiovascular, DBP=Diastolic blood pressure,
DM=Diabetes mellitus, SBP=Systolic blood pressure
Source: Buse JB et al. Circulation 2007;115:114-126
AHA Primary Prevention of CV Disease in DM
Blood Pressure Recommendations (Continued)
Primary Prevention
• Multiple-drug therapy is generally required to achieve BP targets.
Angiotensin Converting
Enzyme Inhibitor Evidence
and Guidelines
ACE Inhibitor:
Mechanism of Action
0.15 Placebo
stroke (%)
0.10 Ramipril
0.05
22% RRR, P<0.001
0.00
0 500 1000 1500
Days of Follow-Up
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Favors Perindopril Favors Placebo
25 Trandolapril
20
15
10
5
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
HOPE, placebo
MI, Cardiac death,
(ramipril)
PEACE, placebo
Years
0.4
Probability of Event
0.35
Placebo
0.3
0.25 ACE-I
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05 OR 0.74 (0.66–0.83)
0
0 1 2 3 4
Years
An ACE-I provides substantial benefit in post-MI LVSD
ACE-I=Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, EF=Ejection fraction, LVSD=Left
ventricular systolic dysfunction, MI=Myocardial infarction, OR=Odds ratio
Source: Flather MD et al. Lancet 2000;355:1575–1581
ACE Inhibitor Recommendations
Secondary Prevention
I IIa IIb III An ACE inhibitor should be started and continued indefinitely
in all patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and
in those with hypertension, DM, or CKD, unless
contraindicated
Angiotensinogen Angiotensin I
ACE
Other Pathways Angiotensin II AT II
Receptor
AT I
Blocker
Receptor
Blocker ATI Receptors ATII
50
Placebo
Hospitalization
40
CV Death or
30
for HF
Candesartan
20
10
HR 0.77 p=0.0004
0
0 1 2 3
Years
0.3 Valsartan
Valsartan and Captopril
0.2
50
Hospitalization
40 Placebo
CV Death or
30
for HF
Candesartan
20
10
HR 0.85, p=0.011
0
0 1 2 3
Years
Addition of an ARB to an ACE inhibitor may provide benefit in those with LVSD
Non-inferiority Margin
Primary Composite (p = 0.003)
CV Death / MI / Stroke /
Hospitalization for Heart Failure
Telmisartan
0.15
Heart Failure
Ramipril
0.10
P=0.216
P=0.048
Lopressor
Metoprolol
Intervention 2,395 12 months PNS NA
tartrate
Trial
23% 40%
CAPRICORN Trial 1,959 Carvedilol 15 months
(P=.03) (P.01)
Phase of Total #
Treatment Patients RR (95% CI)