Dr. Ganesh Hegde Process2014

Quality issues in Higher Education
and Challenges of NAAC

Assessment
Dr. Ganesh
Hegde
Asst. Adviser,
NAAC
Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 1

AFFILIATING UNIVERSITY
DIVERSITY AT THE LEVEL OF COLLEGES
 Constituent Colleges
 Affiliated Colleges
 Government Colleges
 Private Colleges - Aided
 Aided Colleges with unaided courses
 Totally unaided Colleges/ Self-financing
 Autonomous Colleges
Rural Vs Urban
Professional Vs Non-Professional
Digital Vs Non-digital ….. etc.

Need for Quality
Education
Quality in Higher Education stressed in National Policy on
Education(1986) and Programme of Action (1992)
“Excellence of institutions of Higher Education is a function
of many aspects: Self-evaluation and self-improvement are
important. If a mechanism is set up which will encourage
self assessment in institutions and assessment and
accreditation by a Council……… The quality process,
participation, achievements etc., will be constantly
monitored and improved.”
Establishment of NAAC on 16th September, 1994.
National Assessment and
Accreditation Council
To make quality the defining

element of higher education in
India through a combination of
self and external quality
evaluation, promotion and
sustenance initiatives.
NAAC Process…
LOI IEQA format – IEQA status
Submission See the IEQA
format
submission - online
online
40 days Maximum 180 days
In-house Preparation of
Submission of
analysis of the the SSR/RAR
the SSR/RAR by
SSR/RAR by the HEIs the HEIs
Maximum 180 days Maximum 180 days
Peer Team to visit date Constituting a On-site visit by the

finalization in Peer Team to visit Peer Team
consultation with HEIS the HEIs
Interaction with
Meetings with Visit to
the Head of the
stakeholders (parents, alumni, departments and
students, teachers, management, Institution
representatives from
common facilities
Government/University
Contd to next slide….5

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC
NAAC Process…
Verification of Preparation of Exit meeting:
documentation draft Peer Presentation
Team Report of the Report
within 90 days
Communicating Executive Feedback to
the decision to Committee the NAAC
the HEIs decision of NAAC
Maximum 30 days Issuing a Re-

Consideration of Certificate to Accredita
appeal from the HEIs tion after
HEIs, if any
five years
Submitting IEQA
 IEQA application is to be submitted online
through NAAC website: www.naac.gov.in.
 NAAC would intimate the track id., and
inform the institutions to submit IEQA.
 Hardcopy of same may be submitted along
with Demand Draft of Rs. 28090/- in favour
of The Director, NAAC.
 Sign the declaration at the end of IEQA
format.
 No supporting documents are required at
this stage. However, keep in mind that, all
data will be verified by peer team during
assessment visit.
 Wait for communication from NAAC
normally within 3 months.
Stage 2
 Institutional Eligibility for Quality Assessment (IEQA)
approved college to submit SSR within 6 months
time
 Other HEIs – University, Autonomous Colleges and
affiliated colleges declared by UGC as CPE; Re-
accreditation colleges need not go through Stage 1
 These HEI should submit LOI online, wait for the
NAAC intimation letter
 Eligibility verification done by NAAC Regional
Coordinators and informed to HEI.
 Other eligible HEIs to submit SSR within 6 Months of
their LOI.
 The Institutions which could not get the IEQA may
re-submit IEQA after 6 months from the date of last
IEQA.

Seven criteria of NAAC
Criteria: 1 - Curricular Aspects
Criteria: 2 - Teaching-learning and evaluation
Criteria: 3 - Research, consultancy and extension
Criteria: 4 - Infrastructure and learning resources
Criteria: 5 - Student support and progression
Criteria: 6 - Governance Leadership and
Management
Criteria: 7 – Innovations and Best Practices
Criteria statement and key
aspects are more or less
same but many questions
have been fine-tuned.
Total 32 Key Aspects under
seven criteria, with more than
210 key indicators
Criterion-wise differential weightages
Criteria Universi Autonomo Affiliated/
ty us Constituent
College Colleges
I Curricular Aspects 150 150 100
II Teaching-Learning 200 300 350
and Evaluation
III Research, 250 150 150
Consultancy and
Extension
IV Infrastructure and 100 100 100
Learning
Resources
V Student Support 100 100 100
and Progression
VI Governance 100 100 100
Leadership and
Management
VII Innovations and 100 100 100
Best Practices Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 11
Format
SSR/RAR comprise:
Preface
Content page
Executive Summary inclusive of SWOC
analysis of Institution
Profile of the Institution
Criteria-wise Evaluative Report
Not to exceed 200 pages.
to be provided by each Dept.

Department-wise evaluative Report
With SSR
 Five copy of the SSR
 CD in soft copy .pdf
 Compliance Certificate by the
College
 Signature at the end of the SSR -
original
 Affiliation Certificate
 XI/ XII plan grant copy

About the Manual
 The Questions in the Manual are very specific and
to the point, and in certain cases, exhaustive
(What; Give details of etc)
 Some of the questions even redefine our
understanding of higher education
 Give brief and clear answers pertaining to
institution, department or the teacher concerned
 The expectations are very high in case of Teachers
and Departments, as they have been brought to the
centre stage of institutional assessment
 Institutional contributions to Core Values are
spread across the Questionnaire
Criterion-I Curricular Aspects
100
1. Curriculum Planning and

Implementation
20
2. Academic Flexibility
30
3. Curriculum Enrichment
30
15
Curricular Aspects
* Initiatives for effective curriculum
delivery
* Development of curriculum for own
programmes – process
* Core and Elective options
* Choice based credit system
* Self financing programmes – vary from
aided?
* Skill development programmes
* Blended learning
* Curriculum enrichment – graduates
employable Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 16
Curricular Aspects (2)
Ensure that the Curriculum is consistent
with institutional vision/ mission – Go
beyond University -
1.Autonomous and Add-on Certificate, Diploma
programs & self-financing programs
2.Explore for Cafeteria mode with CBCS
3.Upward integration with PG/ M.Phil / Ph.D.
programs
4.Effective planning, implementation and
monitoring systems
5.Feedback mechanism from user
sectors/students Ganesh
on Hegde,
curriculum
Asst. Adviser, NAAC 17
Criterion-II Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
350
1. Student Enrolment and Profile
30
2. Catering to Diverse Needs of Students
50
3. Teaching Learning Process
100
4. Teacher Quality 80
5. Evaluation Process & Reforms
50
6. Student Performance &
Learning Outcomes
Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 40 18
Teaching-learning and Evaluation
* Internal mechanism to review admission process
and student profile – outcome
* Diversity and inclusion
* Sensitizing faculty to issues on inclusion
* Collaborative and independent learning
* Nurturing generic competencies
* Use of technology
* Qualified senior faculties in emerging areas?
* Faculty development / recharge
* Learning outcomes

Teaching-learning and Evaluation
(2)
1. Admission policy and transparency
2. Appointment Policy and Process
3. Comprehensive Academic Calendar
4. Promotion of Learner-centric
teaching/learning
5. Planned Faculty Development / Enrichment
programs
6. Ensure faculty accountability -
(a) Performance Monitoring and Appraisal
(b) Objective and efficient Students
Evaluation of
Teachers
(c) Follow up of Professional Code of
Conduct
7. Ensure transparent,
Ganesh Hegde, Asst.efficient
Adviser, NAAC and objective20
Criterion III Research, Consultancy and
Extension 150
1. Promotion of Research
20
2. Resource Mobilization for Research
10
3. Research Facilities
10
4. Research Publications & Awards
20
5. Consultancy
10
6. Extension Activities and
Institutional Social Responsibility
60 Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 21
Research, Consultancy and
Extension
* Capacity building of teachers
* Attracting researchers of eminence
* Resource mobilization
* Facilities for research
* Collaborative research facilities
* Publication listed in international
database
* Institution policy for consultancy
* Institutional Social Responsibility
Research, Consultancy and
Extension
1. Set up Research Promotion Committee and
introduce system of incentives
2. Define thrust areas of research and motivate
faculty to engage in academic and applied
research
3. Ensure every eligible teacher to take up
research projects – minor/major and industrial
and use the funds for departmental /
institutional development
4. Promote Publication in refereed Journals
5. Encourage IPR related activities
6. Establish Industry Linkages & Collaborations
7. Develop competencies for Consultancy and
lay down Norms for sharing of benefits
8. Funding, motivating and participating in
Institutional Social Responsibility & Extension
Criteria IV 100
Infrastructure and Learning Resources
1. Physical facilities
30
2. Library as Learning Resource
20
3. IT Infrastructure
30
4. Maintenance of Campus
Facilities 20
Any other Ganesh
relevant information
Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC which 24
Infrastructure and Learning
Resources (2)
* Planning and optimal utilization
* Facilities for students and staff
* Adequate and well equipped
physical facilities for curricular,
extra and co-curricular activities
* Library – e-resources, IT
infrastructure
* Maintenance of Campus
* Online learning resources
Infrastructure and Learning
Resources
• Provide for utilities, uninterrupted
electricity/drinking water supply
• Library space, Books, Journals & Periodicals,
Open Access, Internet, Digital and e-library
and monitor the use
• Full-fledged ICT/Digital connectivity,
Language/business Labs
• Multimedia and Virtual classrooms
• Dynamic Institutional website
• Ensure full utilization of
infrastructure/Equipments & Maintenance
• Housekeeping & Cleanliness
Criterion V Student Support and
Progression 100
1. Student Mentoring & Support
50
2. Student Progression 30
1. Student Participation
& Activities 20
Any other relevant information which the
institution wishes to include
Student Support and
Progression (1)
* Counseling services - proactive and enabling
environment, Mentoring
* Sensitivity towards issues of social justice, including
gender, class and caste
* Anti-ragging , Prevention of sexual harassment
* Career guidance and placement services
* Facilitating educational loans
* Student representation on decision making bodies

Student Support and
Progression (2)
• Gender Sensitization & Women Development
programs
• Monitoring drop outs & ensure accountability
for 75% attendance
• Training Centre for Competitive Exams / IT
Literacy
• Information centre for higher education in
India/Abroad
• Vocational Guidance and Summer Placement
• Promotion of NSS/NCC, Sports. Games and
Cultural activities
• Leadership development programs
• Effective Grievances redressal, Welfare &
Incentive systems
• Provide for remedial programs for those at risk
of failure
Criterion VI
100Governance Leadership and Management
1. Institutional Vision & Leadership
10
2. Strategy Development & Deployment
10
3. Faculty Empowerment Strategies
30
4. Financial Management & Resource
Mobilization 20
5. Internal Quality Assurance Systems
30
Any other relevant information which the
institution wishes to include
Governance, Leadership &
Management
* Long-term and short-term planning
* Championing organizational change
* Leadership development for senior faculty
* Quality policy
* Analysis of student feedback
* Performance appraisal of teachers
* Professional development of faculty

• Set up formal system of Institutional
Governance
• Mode of Management Interface –
decentralization and delegation
• Agenda, Deliberations & Minutes, Action
taken Report
• Grooming of second line of Leadership
• Evolving strategic plan for achieving
vision/mission
• Perspective Plan for future development
based on SWOC
• Management Information Systems
• Facilitating Academic /Administrative Audit,
Accreditation & Follow up
• Legal Matters:Ganesh
Grievances Committee,
Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 32
• Budgeting, Fund flow and utilization
• Ensure transparent and proper book-
keeping and accounts and
Monitoring bank accounts /
deposits / reconciliation
• Computerization of accounting
• Budgetary controls, Internal /
Statutory / Government audit
• Resource Planning and Mobilization
• Creating Corpus Fund for future
development
• Formation of IQAC & Institutionalizing
QA process
• Promotion of Quality Culture & Quest
for Excellence
• Implementation of IQAC decisions
• Communication of QA policies and
outcomes to all stakeholders
• Timely submission of AQAR
• Conduct SWOC analysis of the
institution and communicate to
stakeholders for feedback and follow
up action
Criterion VII
100 Innovations and Best Practices
1. Environment Consciousness 30
2. Innovations 30
3. Best Practices 40

Environment Consciousness -
Green Audit – Eco-friendly
initiatives
 Energy conservation
 Use of renewable energy
 Water harvesting
 Check dam construction
 Efforts for Carbon neutrality
 Plantation
 Hazardous waste management
 e-waste management
Individual Social Responsibility
Environment Consciousness
• Proper Maintenance of Campus
• Conduct of Green Audit, Energy Audit
• Management of all types of Waste
• Rain water harvesting and provision
for clean drinking water
• Provide for energy saving system,
including alternative sources energy
• Promotion of Innovative/Inclusive
Practices
• Networking with industry, and all
stakeholders
• Promotion of Autonomy – both of and
in the college
LEADERSHIP
• LEADERSHIP is "organizing a
group of people to achieve a
common Vision".
• Michael King: ‘Leadership is
the ability to engage, inspire,
and motivate others towards
accomplishing shared visions
and goals’.

Evaluative Report of Department
Departmental Inputs and Analysis integrated
Great opportunity to Showcase the Department / Teachers responding to
the 35 Questions covering -
1. Details of Programmes
2. Details of students
3. Details of faculty
4. Details of funded research / projects
5. Details of research facilities/recognition
6. Details of publication
7. Details of consultancy
8. Awards/recognition
9. Eminent visitors
10. Seminar / conferences organized and source of funding
11. Students progression
12. Departmental infrastructure/facilities
13. Details of teaching methods
14. Participation in extension activities
Key Aspect-wise Assessment Indicators as
guidelines/probes
Criteria Key aspects Key indicators/ Guides
for assessors
I Curricular Aspects 4 7,6,6,7 (26)

II Teaching-Learning and 6 4,4, 10,9,7,7 (41)
Evaluation
III Research, Consultancy and 7 11,5, 6, 12, 6, 10,6
Extension (56)
IV Infrastructure and Learning 4 8, 8, 4, 3 (23)
Resources
V Student Support and 3 13, 4, 5 (22)
Progression
VI Governance, Leadership and 5 8, 8, 10, 6,6 (38)
Manangement
VII Innovations and Best 3 3, 1,1 (5)
Practices
Total 32 211
Key Aspect-wise Assessment Indicators as
Curricular Aspects Key Aspects guidelines/probes*
Curriculum Planning
and 9 Assessment Indicators
Implementation (8)
Academic flexibility 7 Assessment Indicators

(6)
4 Assessment Indicators
Curriculum
Enrichment(6)
4 Assessment Indicators
41
Feedback System(3)
The same
instrument is used
for all cycles of AA
Department – wise
Evaluative Report
Subsequent Cycles of
Accreditation
• In the SSRs /RARs institutions opting
for subsequent cycles of accreditation
need to highlight the significant
quality sustenance and enhancement
measures undertaken during the last
four years
(narrative not exceeding 10 pages to
be annexed as “Post-accreditation
initiatives”).
Accreditation
A functional Internal Quality Assurance
Cell (IQAC) and
timely submission of Annual Quality
Assurance Reports (AQARs)
are the Minimum Institutional
Requirements (MIR) to volunteer for
subsequent cycles (second, third or
fourth) of accreditation.

POST-ACCREDITATION INITIATIVES
Many of the suggestions made by the

last NAAC peer team has been taken
up.
Especially in facilitating establishment
of strategic quality management
systems for ensuring continuous
improvement
Activate the system and raise the
institutional capabilities to higher levels
ensuring continuous quality
Accreditation
To volunteer for subsequent cycle of
accreditation, institutions should record
their intent six months before the expiry
of the accreditation status and initiate
institutional preparations for submission
of SSRs.
The institutions which record their intent
to volunteer for subsequent cycle of
accreditation and submit the SSRs within
the stipulated time may continue to use
the outcome of the previous cycle of
accreditation till the status of next cycle
TRANSPARENCY/ ACCOUNTABILITY
Annual Quality Assurance Report
(AQAR) is an important component of
SSR/RAR every year need to be
submitted to NAAC through e-mail
SSR/RAR to be put up on the
University /College Website to
ensure transparency/
accountability and stakeholders to
comments on the authenticity of
information furnished (before 5th
Month and submit to NAAC within
6 months)
Incorrect or false information will
2.3 Teaching-Learning Process
2.3.1 How does the college plan and organize the teaching, learning and
evaluation schedules? (Academic calendar, teaching plan, evaluation blue
print, etc.)
2.3.2 How does IQAC contribute to improve the teaching –learning
process?
2.3.3 How is learning made more student-centric? Give details on the
support structures and systems available for teachers to develop skills like
interactive learning, collaborative learning and independent learning
among the students?
2.3.4 How does the institution nurture critical thinking, creativity and
scientific temper among the students to transform them into life-long
learners and innovators?
2.3.5 What are the technologies and facilities available and used by the
faculty for effective teaching? Eg: Virtual laboratories, e-learning -
resources from National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning
(NPTEL) and National Mission on Education through Information and
Communication Technology (NME-ICT), open educational resources,
mobile education, etc.
2.3.6 How are the students and faculty exposed to advanced level of
knowledge and skills (blended learning, expert lectures, seminars,
workshops etc.)?
2.3.7 Detail (process and the number of students \benefitted) on the
academic, personal and psycho-social support and guidance services
(professional counseling/mentoring/academic advise) provided to
students?
2.3.8 Provide details of innovative teaching approaches/methods
adopted by the faculty during the last four years? What are the efforts
made by the institution to encourage the faulty to adopt new and
innovative approaches and the impact of such innovative practices on
student learning?
2.3.9 How are library resources used to augment the teaching-
learning process?
2.3.10 Does the institution face any challenges in completing the
curriculum within the planned time frame and calendar? If ‘yes’,
elaborate on the challenges encountered and the institutional approaches
to overcome these.
2.3.11 How does the institute monitor and evaluate the quality of
teaching learning?
Key Aspect-wise Assessment Indicators as guideline/
probes
The institution meticulously plans and organizes its teaching schedule
2.3
Teaching Student Centred methods are an integral part of the pedagogy adopted
by the faculty
-learning
Experiential learning, Participative learning, problem solving
process methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences.
(100) The institution has formal linkages with national agencies like
NMEICT to promote blended learning.
Latest technologies are used by the faculty for effective teaching. (e-
learning resources OERs, NPTEL etc.)
Learning environment is conducive for critical thinking, creativity and
scientific temper.
The Institution follows a system of mentor-mentee to meet the
academic and personal needs of students.
The Institution gives due recognition to innovative and creative
contributions of its faculty and students.
Projects / field experiences are integrated into the learning
programmes.
Feedback on the evaluation of teachers is leveraged for improvement
of the quality of teaching-learning process.

GRADING SYSTEM - UNCHANGED
The Grade (A,B,C or D) given to each of the

32 Key Aspects is converted in to equivalent
Quantities (4,3,2,1,0 etc)
Weighted Score is arrived at (e g: 10 x 3 = 30)
Weighted score of each of the key aspects
are added up to get the Criterion Total Score
Criterion score is divided by the Criterion
Weight to arrive at the Criterion Grade
Point. (next slide)
CALCULATION OF GRADE: ILLUSTRATION
Example: X1 Curricular Aspects 100 Out of 4 Score
1. Curriculum Planning &
Implementation 20 3 60
2. Curriculum Flexibility 30 3 90
3. Curriculum Enrichment 30 2 60
4. Feedback System 20 0 00
___________________________________________________________________
210
GP X1 = 60 + 90 + 60 + 00 = 210 = 2.10
100 100
Similarly, GP can be worked out for Criterion X2 to X7.

INSTITUTIONAL GRADE
IG = (100x2.5) + (350x2.8)….+ (100x2.6) = _2750_ = 2.75
1000 1000
Range of institutional Letter Performance
Cumulative Grade Descriptor
Grade Point Average
(CGPA)
3.01 - 4.00 A Very Good
(Accredited)
2.01 - 3.00 B Good
(Accredited)
1.51 - 2.00 C Satisfactory
(Accredited)
< 1.50 D Unsatisfactor
y
(Not 53
PT Report
PT Report is shared with the Head of Institution,
which is formally handed over to him at the Exit
Meeting.
However, the Grade Sheet is absolutely confidential,
which will be disclosed by NAAC Office once
approved by the Executive Committee
If aggrieved, the institution may make an appeal

to Director, NAAC, who will place it before the
Appeal Committee, whose decision, after due
consideration, will be final and binding.
Duties and Responsibilities of Higher
Education Institutions V/s NAAC
 HEIs need to submit various documents to NAAC on

receipt of track id.
 HEI to upload SSR on the institution website one
month prior to submission of the final document
(under intimation to NAAC) and retain the same till
the PTV is completed.
Public Disclosure Policy
 Accreditation Award Ceremony – Head of the
institution to receive the accreditation certificate in
person.
 Eligibility
 Fee structure
Institutions needGanesh
to Hegde,
be Asst.
careful
Adviser, NAAC
w.r.t. old and 55
revised manuals, while they are preparing the
Guidelines for SSR submission
Along with the guidelines mentioned in the

institution-specific NAAC manuals, the
institutions are expected to do the following:
Universities are required to submit 10 copies of
the SSR/RAR and colleges 5 five copies.
 The main document –SSR/RAR – of not more than
200 pages should contain focused information
as per the relevant NAAC manuals. Annexure
and supporting documents need not be enclosed
with the SSR, and may be presented to the Peer
Team during the on-site visit.
 A soft copy of the institutional SSR/RAR should
also be submitted to NAAC in the Microsoft Word
format in a CD.
Cont’d
Cont’d
 Institutions recognized under 2(f ) &
12(B) of UGC have to submit a
photocopy of the certificate of such
recognition or a photocopy of the Xth
plan developmental grants as
sanctioned by the UGC duly attested
by the Head of the institution.
 While submitting the SSR/RAR, the
institution has to indicate three
options of time slots in the order of
preference for the Peer Team Visit, the
first choice being after 60 days of
submission of the SSR/RAR to the
NAAC.
 Validity of the Self-Study Report is
Fee Structure
On the recommendations of the
Executive Committee (EC) of NAAC, the
University Grants Commission (UGC) has
approved the following fee structure:
For seeking LOI, IEQA Status, for
Affiliated and Constituent Colleges
seeking A/A for the first-time - Rs.
28090/- (each time)
For Fee structure
Please see our website
Cont’d
NAAC-UGC Assistance
Accreditation and Re-Accreditation
• For those Institutions recognized under 2(f )
& 12(B) of UGC have to submit a photocopy
of the certificate of such recognition or a
photocopy of the XIth plan developmental
grants as sanctioned by the UGC duly
attested by the Head of the institution along
with SSR/ RAR.

Guidelines for UGC Assistance
for Assessment and
Accreditation of Higher
Education Institutions (please
make sure that all the team
members will provide the bills
and necessary travel voucher,
air tickets, boarding pass to the
co-ordinator of the institution
for payment)
Other–wise you may not get the
reimbursement
From Peer team Chairperson / Member
Coordinator/Member
No Conflict of Interest Statement
(signed by the chairperson and
members – individually)
Declaration to be given by Peer
Team – Collectively
Code of Conduct to be given by
Peer Team Members – Individually
Feedback from peer team members
– Individually or Collectively
From Institution
No Conflict of Interest Statement
(signed and sealed by the Head of the
Institution)
Declaration to be given by Head of the
Institution
Institution)
Feedback from the College / Institution
Institution within a week need to be sent
to NAAC)
Code of Conduct to be given by Head of 62
ToCopy
Hard give the
of the Peer
Peer TeamTeam
Report
(signed in all pages by chairperson;
signed by all members in the last
page; signed and sealed by the Head
of the Institution in the last page)
Profile of the College / Institution
(signed by chairperson; signed by all
members of the peer team; signed
and sealed by the Head of the
Institution)
Actual Visit Schedule
(signed by chairperson and members
in all pages; signed by the Head of the
Institution in all pages)
NAAC folder
(to present the report
in the Exit Meeting)
Please Don’t open the Cover and Hand

over to the Chairperson / Member
Coordinator/Member of the Peer team
HEIS ACCREDITED BY NAAC
Accredited Re-Accredited
(1st Cycle) (2st Cycle) 3rd cycle
Number of 5751 1805 118

Colleges
Number of 196 97 20
Universities
Total 5947 1902 138
Grand Total = 7987

National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) – Dr. Ganesh A. Hegde 65

Welcome for your feedback and suggestions
Dr. Ganesh Hegde, Assistant Adviser, NAAC
ganesh179@gmail.com
Thank You
Visit: www.naac.gov.in

Dr. Ganesh Hegde Process2014

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Dr. Ganesh Hegde Process2014

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Quality issues in Higher Education

and Challenges of NAAC

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 1

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 2

To make quality the defining

Peer Team to visit date Constituting a On-site visit by the

Contd to next slide….5

Maximum 30 days Issuing a Re-

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 8

to be provided by each Dept.

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 13

1. Curriculum Planning and

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 19

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 28

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 31

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 35

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 38

I Curricular Aspects 4 7,6,6,7 (26)

Academic flexibility 7 Assessment Indicators

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 44

Many of the suggestions made by the

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 50

The Grade (A,B,C or D) given to each of the

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 52

If aggrieved, the institution may make an appeal

 HEIs need to submit various documents to NAAC on

Along with the guidelines mentioned in the

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC 59

Please Don’t open the Cover and Hand

Number of 5751 1805 118

Grand Total = 7987

Ganesh Hegde, Asst. Adviser, NAAC

Dr. Ganesh Hegde, Assistant Adviser, NAAC

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen