SUMMARY OF COURT CASES

As on 25/01/2019

NAME OF COURT NO. OF CASES

SLP title UOI Vs Gurpinder Singh &

Supreme Court 03 Ors. is pending before Hon’ble
Supreme Court.
High Court Kolkata 01

High Court Chandigarh 11 *Dharampal Vs State of Punjab & ors.

High Court New Delhi 01
High Court Jammu- Srinagar 01
CAT Principal Bench 03
CAT Chandigarh Bench 05
CAT Lucknow Bench 01
Distt. Court Lalitpur 01

Distt. Court Patiala 03 *Partap Singh Vs UOI & Ors.

Industrial Tribunal cum Labour 01

Court, Chandigarh
Total 35

*Oldest Cases
SLPs in reservation in restructuring matters are pending
 Court Cases of Supreme Court

CASE CASE TITLE NEXT CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE
Sr. No NO DATE

Petitioner challenge the order

dt 18/01/2017 passed by
Hon’ble High Court Punjab
SLP and Haryana, Chandigarh in
UOI & Ors Vs
(Diary R.B. Yadav, Dy.
1 Gurpinder Singh & 29/11/18 restructuring matter. Case Yet to be listed
No. was listed on 20/09/2017. Govt. Advocate
Ors.
22349) Now the case will be heard by
the larger Bench.

Cases of High Court, Kolkata

Sr . CASE CASE TITLE NEXT CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE
No NO DATE
Petitioner had filed CWP against the
DAR action initiated by Sr.
As informed by
Divisional Security Commissioner,
RPF/UMB
CWP N. Rly. Ambala. It is learnt that CWP
U.O.I Vs JAGDISH Yet to be appeal is yet to Sh. Swapan
1 NO. of has been disposed off. But RPF
CHANDER LASKAR listed be listed. Action Banerjee
2017 Admn. of N. Railway has filed
is required to be
appeal in High Court, Kolkata.
taken by N. Rly.
CME/DMW was one of the
respondents in the case.
 High Court Punjab & Haryana, Chandigarh

Sr. CASE NO CASE TITLE NEXT DATE CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE
No
Petitioner filed CWP challenging
the orders of Hon’ble CAT
dismissing the OA filed by
CWP NO. Written Statement has
Vivek Bhatia VS applicant regarding inquiry Sh. G.S
1 23184 of UOI APT
conducted by Railway Board
been filed on 5/9/2015.
SATHI
2015 No action required.
Vigilance in the matter of
Selection for the post of AMM
held in 2005.
Since the case was in
Petitioner filed CWP assailing
favour of Admn. in
the orders of CAT rejecting their
CWP Tarsem Singh & CAT, as per version of
claim for MACP at the rate of Rs. Sh. Amit
2 No.4743 of Ors. VS UOI & APT
2400 grade pay. DMW has
Advocate no WS is
Kumar
2015 Ors. required to be. But he
granted it at the rate of Rs.2000
is being asked in
as per Rules
writing to file the WS.
Petitioner filed the CWP
challenging the orders of Hon’ble No next date is
CAT dismissing his O.A. seeking available on Since the
protection of Pay on his transfer case was in favour of
CWP no. from RCF to DMW in bottom Admn. in CAT, as per
Pritam Singh Vs Sh. Puneet
3 14826 of UOI Pending grade having element of direct version of Advocate no
Jindal
2015 recruitment. As per Railway WS is required to be.
Board’s direction pay of staff But he is being asked
cannot be protected if he/she in writing to file the
has not completed 12 months WS.
service in promotional grade.
Sr. CASE CASE NEXT DATE CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE
No NO TITLE

Petitioner filed the CWP challenging

Short reply has been
the inquiry report submitted by
filed. Controlling officer
Dharam Punjab State regarding cancellation
03.07.2018 has been asked to write
CWP no. Pal Vs of his caste certificate. He has
05.09.2018 of State Govt. to expedite Sh. Karamjit
4 16850 of State of impleaded CME because of DAR
06.03.2019 the reply. Moreover RA Verma
2013 Punjab & action was initiated
25/07/2019 is being asked to file MA
Ors. by DMW. As informed by Railway
to vacate the interim
Advocate, defence reply from Punjab
stay order
Govt. is yet to be filed.
Petitioner has filed CWP assailing
the action of RRB (J-S) for
not selecting him as JE against OBC
Pending. RA is advised
CWP no. Arun Kr. post. Petition has no
05/02/2019 to file MA to get delete
5 10425 of Yadav Vs cause of action against DMW. A Sh. G.S.Sathi
11/04/2019 the name of DMW
2016 UOI letter to RRB has been
authorities.
written to include the name of DMW
respondent in reply
being pleaded by RRB (J-S).
Sh. Partap Singh has filed a civil suit
against his termination from service.
UOI Vs In fact plaintiff used forged
Partap educational certificate while securing
CR 606 Pending. No action is Sh. Jagdish
6 Singh & 03/12/2018 job during his selection from RRB
required. Marwaha
of 2008 Others Jammu. Admn. challenged the
admission of case by Civil Court
before High Court on jurisdiction
ground
Petitioner filed the CWP assailing the
Sh. Karamjit
action of RRB.J-S for not selecting
Verma
CWP Manoj him to the post of Elect.. Fitter
A letter has been written nominated by
No.196 Kumar claiming to be under handicapped
to RCF to get deleted the RCF to contest
7. Mal Vs Pending quota. Actually indent for the post
name of DMW authorities the case on
3 of UOI & was of RCF. Hence petitioner has
2017 by filing M.A. behalf of DMW
Other no cause of action against DMW
respondents
authorities. He has wrongly
also.
impleaded DMW authorities.
Sr. CASE CASE NEXT CAUSE FOR FILING STATUS ADVOCATE
N NO TITLE DATE SUIT
o

Applicant has challenged the FIR

Girish lodged by N. Rly/ RPF, alleging
CR-M 03/7/2018 his involvement in mass agitation Case is to be
Chander Vs
04/10/2018 comprising DMW Staff held on mainly contested Sh. Karamjit
8 no.33710 State of
12/02/2019 Verma
of 2017 Punjab and 03/03/2014 at Railway Fatak by RPF.
22/07/2019 near DMW workshop.
Others

Petitioner filed the CWP for

Sh. Sathi has
payment of his fee bills. It is
been apprised of
pertinent to mention here that
17/9/2018 the position. His
DMW has paid him the maximum
CWP 16/11/2018 main grouse is
Gulwant of legal fee bill.
28/01/2019 with N. Railway. Sh. Karamjit
9 No.14360 Singh Sathi
11/02/2019 He has been Verma
of 2018 Vs UOI 20/03/2019 advised to delete
24/05/2019 the name of DMW
in the array of
parties.
Land Loser

CWP no.
UOI vs Rana
10 338 of Singh
27/05/2019 Puneet Jindal
2019

Land Loser

CWP no.
UOI vs Daler
11 197 of Singh
27/05/2019 Puneet Jindal
2019
 Cases of High Court of New Delhi

Sr No CASE NO CASE TITLE NEXT CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE
DATE

UOI has filed the CWP

against the impugned orders
dated 13.1.2014 passed by
CAT, Principal Bench in RA
Pending.
Union of India No. 334/2012 in O.A.
CWP NO. 18/09/2018 No action is
1 Vs Abdul 428/2011 whereby the SH. J.K Singh
4272/2014 22/04/2019 required.
Saydeed Tribunal directed for grant of
arrear of pay w.e.f.
01.11.2003 to 26.11.2009.
This the case of error in
promotion

Cases of High Court of Jammu - Srinagar

Sr No CASE NO CASE TITLE NEXT DATE CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE

Petitioner has filed the CWP

pleading that despite
applying as OBC candidate Pending.
his qualifying for the RRB is
examination, for the post of being asked
JE/Mech and JE/Elect. His to get the
SWP no. name did not figure in the name of
Mohsin Bashir Not Listed Shabir Ahmed
1 716 of final select list. The main DMW
Vs UOI yet Naik
2016 cause of action is with RRB authority
and letter dated 21/4/2016 deleted from
has been sent to RRB for the array of
filing reply on behalf of all parties by
respondents. Reply has filing M.A.
been filed by RRB on behalf
of respondents.
 Case of
Central Administrative Tribunal/ New Delhi

Sr. No CASE NO CASE TITLE NEXT DATE CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE

Applicant, while employed as

Pharmacist, was dismissed
under DAR action.
Subsequently he was ordered to
Shishu be reinstated in service by the
23/7/2018
O.A Paul Verma Revising Authority. Although he Sh.
17/8/12018 WS has
1 No.100/337 Vs has reported for duty but he has Shailender
25/09/2018 been filed
7/2016 UOI and not joined duty on account of Tiwary
14/02/2019
Ors non – appearing in medical
examination. The O.A. is against
the dismissal orders under
D&AR. Comments have been
sent to RA for preparing reply.
Applicant has filed the OA
assailing the action of
Reply to be
administration for not granting
filed.
Shishu Subsistence Allowance and
Comments
Paul Verma 10/07/2018 Child Care Allowance for the
are being Sh.
O.A. no. Vs 24/08/2018 period 2014-15 and another
2 prepared Shailender
4538/2017 UOI and 04/10/2018 claim of Subsistence Allowance
by D&AR Tiwary
Ors after issuance of revisional
and Bill
order dt. 31/10/15 changing the
Section.
dies - non period i.e. 05/10/13
to 17/10/14 to be paid minimum
subsistence allowance.
Applicant has filed the OA
praying for deciding his revision
Shishu
petition Sh.
O.A. no. Paul Verma
27/02/2019 Shailender
3 3929 of Vs
15/05/2019 Tiwary
2018 UOI and
Ors
 Cases of
Central Administrative Tribunal/ Chandigarh Bench

Sr CASE NO CASE TITLE NEXT CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE
No DATE
Applicant has field suit for
appointment under Companionate
24/09/201
Ground and settlement dues after
8
O.A no. Mandip the death of his father where as
02/11/201 Sh. G.S.
1 60/247 of Singh Vs the applicant was not dependent to Reply filed
8 Sathi
2018 UOI & ors. the deceased employee as his
07/02/19
mother got divorced from the
14/05/19
employee and got herself married
again.
WS yet to
26/10/18 be filed.
O.A.No.0 Aplicant is SSE in Civil Engg. filed
Manoj Kr. Vs 24/12/18 Comments Sh. Karamjit
2 60/875/20 the O.A. challenging D&A action
UOI & Ors. 01/04/19 are being Verma
18 taken for indulgence in theft case
19/07/19 asked from
DA
M.A. no. Applicant filed execution petition
1530/201 pleading for implementation of
8 Jarnail Singh 26/11/201 order of 27/04/2017. Sh. Jagdish
3 Pending
O.A. No. Vs UOI 8 Marwaha
1122/201
3

O.A. no. Applicant has challenged the order

Mehar Singh 07/01/201 RA is being
4 1321/201 of DA regarding fixation of Pending
Vs UOI 8 nominated
8 Companionate allowance.

Applicant is seeking benefit of

Niranjan RA is being
O.A. no. 13/05/201 complimentary passes after
5 Singh Vs Pending nominated
289/2019 9 retirement praying for adding of his
UOI
earlier service.
 Cases of
Central Administrative Tribunal/ Lucknow

Sr No CASE NO CASE NEXT DATE CAUSE FOR FILING STATUS ADVOCATE

TITLE SUIT
Applicant filed OA Written
challenging his termination statement
as Substitute TADK. has been
Pankaj Applicant was filed in
Mishra unauthorized absent from Sh. Sidharth
O.A No. 30/07/2018 Dec.2014.
1 Vs duty and could not Verma, CAT,
543/2013 09/10/2018 Case has
UOI & become eligible for LKO
been partly
Others screening. argued. No
action is
required

Cases of
District Court, Lalitpur

Sr No CASE NO CASE NEXT DATE CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE
TITLE
Defendant was selected as
trainee MCT on Case has
31/07/1989. As per the been
bond he was bound to argued as
serve the plaintiff for 5 intimated
Distt. Court UOI Vs
years. He left DMW. Suit by Sh. Raj
1 Lalitpur of Umar Dass APT
for recovery of Rs. 9874 advocate Kumar Jain
2010
plus interest was filed in and the
Patiala court. Decree was defendant
pronounced. Now could not
execution proceedings be traced.
have been filed at Lalitpur.
 Cases of
District Court, Patiala

Sr. CASE NO CASE TITLE NEXT DATE CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE
No

He has filed a civil suit Hon’ble High

against his termination from Court stayed
Distt.
Partap Singh Adjourned service. In fact plaintiff the
Court, Sh.
1 Vs UOI sine die used forged educational proceeding at
Patiala of T.M.SAYAL
certificate while securing job .Distt. Court.
2008
during his selection from No action is
RRB Jammu. required.
Petitioner is the daughter of
the died employee of DMW.
She has filed suit against
Distt. judgement dated Reply has
Raheem
Court, CS 31/07/2018 28/01/2009 of Civil Court , been filed. No Sh.
2 Khanum Vs
1510 of 29/11/2018 Patiala which declared her action is T.M.SAYAL
UOI
2015 mother as legal wife of required.
deceased employee.
Settlement dues were paid
by DMW to widow.

Distt.
Court, UOI vs Azhar Sh. Dinesh
3 Recovery Suit Pending
Patiala of Rashid Sharma
2017
 Cases of
Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Chandigarh

Sr No CASE NO CASE NEXT CAUSE FOR FILING SUIT STATUS ADVOCATE

TITLE DATE
New Pension Scheme was
adopted in Railways w.e.f
01/01/2004. Some group ‘D’
staff (Safai Wala) who were
Sukhwant appointed after 01/01/2004 Written
Singh & 19/09/2018 against land loser quota filed an statement Sh. Rohit
1 28 of 2017
ors. V/S 19/11/2018 application seeking to treat has been Sharma
DMW them under Railway Pension filed.
Rules 1993 on the plea that
process of recruitment was
initiated before 01/01/2004.

The case has been forwarded

by Mo Labour after non
conciliation of the claim of Sh.
Jagdev Singh before ALC,
Jalandhar . Applicant was
Jagdev
removed from service upon his Sh. Kumar
2 Singh vs 03/04/2019 Pending
conviction by court of law Niskhep
UOI