THE EFFECT OF USING MULTIMEDIA

POWERPOINT IN TEACHING WRITING

DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TOWARD EIGHTH GRADERS
OF SMPN 5 JAMBI CITY

A Thesis
WRITTEN BY:
NAFRIANTI
A1B212030
Chapter 1
Background of The Research

KTSP
Writing Skill Descriptive Text
Curriculum

The usage of
Media for Some problems in
PowerPoint
teaching teaching writing
 The question of The objective of
research research

Is there any to find out whether

significant effect in PowerPoint has
students’ writing significant effect on The limitation of
achievement in students’ research
descriptive text by achievement in
using PowerPoint at descriptive text of
the eighth grades of the eighth grades of
SMPN 5 Jambi City? SMPN 5 Jambi City.
 Hypothesis

1. Null Hypothesis (Ho)

The Significance of 2. Research Hypothesis (H1).
The definition of
Research Terms
 Chapter 2

2.1 Concept of Media

2.2 Concept of Multimedia

2.3 PowerPoint
2.4 Writing

2.5 Kinds of Text

2.6 Descriptive Text
2.7 Teaching Writing by using
Multimedia PowerPoint

2.8 Previous study

Chapter 3

Experimetal Group Group 1 Pre-test PowerPoint Post-test

Control Group Group 2 Pre-test Text Book Post-test

• Experimental research
• Quasi-experimental research
• Pre-test post-test non-equivalent control group design
 3.Population and sample
- Population
4. Technique of Data
The eighth grade students
2. Variables Collection
of SMPN 5 Jambi City
Pre-test
• Sample
Independent and
VIII G = Experimental
dependent variable
Group
Post- test
VIII H= Control group

5. Treatment 6. Instrumentation
Procedure Essay test
Validity and Reliability
Reallibility

Variables Number α Level

of Items
Content 1 .858
Organization 1 .791
Content Validity Grammar 1 .784
Vocabulary 1 .774
Mechanic 1 .813
OVERALL 5 .834
 Procedure of Data Analysis

Procedure of
Scoring
Hypotheses
Scoring system is
Testing
based on five
• Independent
elements: Content,
sample t-test
organization,
•Paired sample
grammar,
t-test
vocabulary and
mechanics.
 CHAPTER IV
FINDING AND DISCUSSION

Table 6: Descriptive Statistics of Students’ Score in Pre-test in Experimental Class and Control Class
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Pretestexperimental 36 25 65 36.39 11.506
Pretestcontrol 36 0 50 28.71 8.026
Valid N (listwise) 36

The Frequency Distribution of Students’ Score in Pre-test in Experimental Class and Control Class

Score Category Pre-test experimental class Pre-test control class

Frequency Precentage Frequency Precentage
81-100 Very good 0 0 0 0
61-80 Good 2 5.56% 0 0
41-60 Fair 10 27.77% 3 8.33%
21-41 Poor 24 66.67% 32 88.89%
0-20 Very poor 0 0 1 2.78%
 Table 8: Descriptive Statistics of Students’ Score in Post-test in Experimental Class and Control Class
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Posttestexperimental 36 25 77.50 51.39 15.892
Posttestcontrol 36 25 62.50 40.76 10.877
Valid N (listwise) 36

The Frequency Distribution of Students’ Score in Post-test in Experimental Class and Control Class

Score Category Post-test experimental class Post-test control class

Frequency Precentage Frequency Precentage
81-100 Very good 0 0 0 0
61-80 Good 12 33.33% 2 5.56%
41-60 Fair 20 55.56% 13 36.11%
21-40 Poor 4 11.11% 21 58.33%
0-20 Very poor 0 0 0 0
Paired sample T-test Conducted to Experimental Class toward Content of pre-test and post test.
Dependent Variable Test Mean T Sig.

Experimental class Pre-content 4.75 -5.857 .000

Post-content 7.08

aired sample T-test Conducted to Experimental class toward pre-organization test and post-organization t

Dependent Variable Test Mean T Sig.

Experimental Class Pre-organization 2.80 -5.301 .000
Post-organization 4.17

Paired sample T-test Conducted to Experimental class toward pre-grammar test and post-grammar test
Dependent Variable Test Mean T Sig.
Experimental class Pre-grammar 2.61 -3.618 .001

Post-grammar 3.39
Paired sample T-test Conducted to Experimental class toward pre-vocabulary test and post-vocabulary t

Dependent Variable Test Mean T Sig.

Experimental Class Pre-vocabulary 2.29 -4.782 .000

Post-vocabulary 3.17

Paired sample T-test Conducted to Control class toward pre-test and post test.

Dependent Variable Test Mean T Sig.

Experimental class Pre-mechanic 2.04 -3.497 .001

Post-mechanic 2.75
 T-test Conducted to Control Class and Experiment toward post test.
Dependent Variable Group Mean t Sig.

Post- test Experimental Class 51.39 3.310 .001

Control Class 40.76

Paired sample T-test Conducted to Experimental class toward pre-test and post test.

Dependent Variable Test Mean T Sig.

Experimental Class Pre-test score 36.39 -6.271 .000

Post-test score 51.39

 Discussion
The Mean of Pre-Test and Post-Test of the Experimental and Control Class and Their Difference

Class Pre-test Post-test Difference

36.39
Experimental 51.39 15.00
28.71
Control class 40.76 12.05
7.68
10.63
Discussion
There was significant effect of using PowerPoint on
students’ achievement in descriptive text of the eighth
graders at SMPN 5 Jambi City.

Students had motivation to write and

become active participants
 CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION

SUGGESTION