Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CONCRETE WITH
BANANA TRUNK ASH
(musa acuminta)
AS PARTIAL REPLACEMENT
FOR CEMENT
Malayan
Colleges
Laguna
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Background of the study Comes from the word “concretus”
First used by the Egyptians
Further developed by the Romans
Concrete
Most commonly used in construction
Serves as binder in the concrete
Introduced in Philippines by
Cement Agustinian Recolects
• What are the flexural strengths (MPa) of concrete using 2%, 3.5%, and 5%
banana trunk ash-cement ratio using ASTM C293?
Cost Effective
Environmental Friendly
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF RELATED
LITERATURE
Agricultural waste
Morphology
Banana
Production
Properties
Related study
AW as Partial Replacement
substitute
Some agricultural wastes are used as a
for Aggregates
20%
Banana
52%
28%
According to the Philippine Statistics
Authority, the production of banana
increased by 2.1% percent from 10 million
metric tons in 2017 to 2.14 million metric
Cavendish Saba Latundan and the rest
tons as of 2018.
Morphology of Banana
Plant
Properties of Banana ash
“Strength performance of banana fiber ah as
cementitious material with different
temperature”
Related Studies
Wahab, M. L. H. B. (2015)
500oC for 2 hours
1%, 2%, and 3% of banana trunk ash by weight
2% performed the best with a compressive strength of 9.149MPa
followed with 1% having 8.709MPa and lastly 3% with 8.349MPa
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY
Methodology
MATERIALS
COST ANALYSIS
DATA ANALYSIS
TESTS
Materials
Percent Curing CST FST
samples) samples)
3.5% 28 3 ment 3
11.6 MPa
7.8 MPa
8.1 MPa
TRIAL 1
9.8 MPa
10.8 MPa
8.8 MPa
7.9 MPa
TRIAL 2
10.4 MPa
10.4 MPa
8.7 MPa
10.4 MPa
MPa
7.7 MPa
8.7
TRIAL 3
MPa
9.6 MPa
7.7
9.6 MPa
0%
2%
5%
Legend
3.5%
14
12
10
Results of CST
8
Trial 1
Trial 2
6 Trial 3
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
2.9 MPa
0.76 MPa
2.44 MPa
TRIAL 1
1.95 MPa
3.64 MPa
0.93 MPa
3.20 MPa
TRIAL 2
2.17 MPa
4.50 MPa
MPa
0.78 MPa
10.4
2.43
8.7 MPaMPa
TRIAL 3
1.89MPa
7.7 MPa
0%
2%
5%
Legend
3.5%
5
4.5
3.5
Results of FST
Trial 1
2.5
Trial 2
Trial 3
2
1.5
0.5
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
DIFFERENCE IN
COMPARISONS Rp DIFFERENCE
MEANS
0 vs 5 0.7417 1 Significant
SOURCE OF
SS df MS F P-value Fcrit
VARIATION
Statistical Analysis
Total 14.4666 11
C SS df MS F P-value Fcrit
Total 27.7567 11
100
90
80
Cost Analysis
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 2 3.5 5
• The concrete samples with BTA replacements did not meet the strength of the
control samples with respect to the compressive strength of the concrete,
• The concrete sample with BTA replacement of 5% has the nearest compressive
strength value compared to the control samples.
• The concrete sample with a BTA replacement of 3.5% has the highest optimal
flexural strength based on the results because the highest value obtained by
3.5% exceeded the lowest value of the controlled sample.