Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PRESIDENT:
Salva Kiir Mayardit
Taiwan flag was
officially adopted on
October 28, 1928.
aborigines,
Hakka,
Hok-lo; and
Mainlanders
History:
Principle of self-determination
Modern international law pronounces the idea that, people have a right,
which is above the territorial right of a state, to found a government that
can truly represent all the people in the said region and not to be subject
to oppression as a result of racial, religious, ethnic and other differences.
So when a certain number of people, or the minority groups within an
existing state are oppressed, they have the right to demand
independence and self-determination. That is, a state's territorial right
cannot override the principle of self-determination.
Moreover, this rule was adopted during the feudal era when a lord
treated his people on his land as his own possession at his disposal. In
modern societies, the will of the people on the land in dispute has
become decisive in the judicature of the International Court of Justice.
Ergo, she should not be all the disposal of any alien power; the will of
the people should decide the future of the land, not vice versa.
THIRD CLAIM
- Japan gave up its claims on Taiwan and the Pescadores. However, there
were no remarks saying that Taiwan would be given to China (According
to Article 21, what China would gain was stipulated in Articles 10 and
14). After signing this treaty, Japan no longer has any right to
give Taiwan away because according to international law it did not
own Taiwan anymore.
FOURTH CLAIM
China suggests that 157 countries recognize that Taiwan is part of China. In
fact, these countries use words such as "understand" or "notice" instead of
"endorse" of "confer" referring to the "One China" policy
- But only nations may file a legal action with the ICJ. If
Taiwan is blocked from filing themselves, asking the ICJ to
issue an advisory opinion should be feasible through their
allies…
Article 96 of ICJ Statute:
“a. The General Assembly or the Security Council may request the
International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on any legal
question.
b. Other organs of the United Nations and specialized agencies,
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx so authorized by the General Assembly, may also
request advisory opinions of the Court on legal questions arising
within the scope of their activities.”
The General Assembly has exercised this power on a
number of occasions
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/03/01/opinion/01iht-edhwang.t.htm
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
factbook/geos/tw.html
http://taup.yam.org.tw/1t1c/tp1tce11.html
www.taiwanadvice.com/examlegal.pdf
http://www.icj-cij.org/
maps.google.com
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0107996.html?pageno=1#ixzz1UhwDPdL6
www.iss.co.za/af/profiles/Sudan/darfur/cpaprov.htm
http://www.islamonline.net/english/news/2008-09/14/03.shtml. Retrieved 2008-10-02
http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/exeres/6670DB89-C6FF-45D4-8936-FF3F228FD961.htm
http://www.undp.org.ge/index.php?sec_id=33&lang_id=ENG
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gg.html