Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Program
PROJECT
TITLE
STEP 1
• SDO- Navotas CI Team
Charter
• SDO Profile
• Project Rationale
• Objectives
• Respondents’ Profile
Dr. Romulo B. Rocena
Schools Division Superintendent
Consultant
Araling
Panlipunan 49.44
LOW NAT SCORES
Filipino 61.25
SCIENCE 42.67
FACTORS
AFFECTING
LEARNERS
PERFORMANCE
Mathematics 43.31
English 41.31
Project rationale
EPS Performance Commitment (IPCR)
Plan
Preparation
/M&E
Instructional 30%
Supervision
50%
Research /
Evaluation &
Teaching
Innovation
10%
Conduct of
Report
InSet
Preparation
5%
Plan Preparation /M&E
5% Research / Evaluation & Teaching Innovation
Conduct of InSet Report Preparation
Instructional Supervision
Step 1
DIVISION KPIs
Curriculum Instruction Assessment
Project ARISE:
Navotas Science aims
to raise the quality of
instruction and
teachers competence
in teaching all the
learning components
in Science
8
9
Why Science?
The K-12 curriculum
introduced the four areas Earth
Biology, Physics, Chemistry Science
and Earth Sciences which are
presented with increasing
levels of complexity from one
grade level to another in spiral K to 12
progression. Biology Chemistry
curriculum
Teachers need to possess the
competency and skills across
science topics and other
disciplines to be effective and
Physics
to enable the learners to
achieve deeper understanding
of the core concepts
Step 1
50
45
40
These scores are substantially below the DepEd
35 75% standard passing rate
30 SY 2011-2012
25 SY 2012-2013
20 SY 2013-2014
SY 2014-2015
15
10
5
40.64 45.63 43.89 42.67
0
11
Y4 NAT Result
Unfortunate event #1
Teacher factors
45% 42%
20
38% 38%
15
10
5
More than half of the teachers had no training in
specific areas of Science
0
Chem E Sci Bio Phys
Our milestone so far
Profiling of Teachers,
Conducted content-
based assessment , Identified priority
survey and FGD to improvements Prepared
generate and based on the result Implementation Plan
validate data of RCA
classroom observation
...the department
heads and the
principals
FGD with the department heads
Chemistry 11 8
Physics 11 5
Earth Science 9 3
Biology 11 0
Teach-All 4 1
Total 46 17
Result of Grade 10 Science Teachers’ Content-Based
Assessment during the Content-Based Training
Pre-Test
(Before
30 42.60 49.27 30.00 32.23 44.08
the
Training)
Post Test
(After the 30 55.20 56.30 42.60 44.07 55.00
Training)
PROBLEM STATEMENT
• TNA
Checklist Generated Result
• Guidelines • TNA
• Content-
EPS K to 12
Based
School Head (Science Assessment
Science Subjects) • Accomplished Grade 10
Department • Teachers Teachers’
Instructional Science
Head Profile Observation
Supervision Teachers
• CB-Past Checklist
• TOC
• Content-
Based Test
Provision
Classroo
Plannin of Monitoring
m Post-
Conference Technical and
g Observati
Assistanc Evaluation
on
e
EPS Office of the CID-Chief Office of the ASDS Office of the SDS
STAR STAR STAR
T START
T T
Signs accomplished
Supervisory plan
Classroom Observation
proper
Pain Points
Observes teacher whoever is
available. No specific teacher to
observe.
Monitors the
conduct of
mentoring
Pain Points
No agreed mentoring schedule
• Focused Problem
Statement
• Objective Statement
Focused Problem Statement
4. Classroom Observation Controllable • A deployment strategy that all EPS will visit at least
24 teachers in a month.
is only 8.7% vis a vis a • Result of observation must be evaluated by the CID
target of 25% in Chief/ASDS
Instructional Supervision for • Require the School heads and the department
a year. heads to submit the TOC to the office of the CID
chief for further evaluation
• Follow-up observation must be conducted at least a
week after the provision of technical assistance
PROCESS STEPS
Monitoring
Competency Classroom Post- Technical
Assessment Planning Observation Conference Assistance
and
Evaluation
PRINCIPAL &
DEPARTMENT HEAD EPS
STAR STAR
T T
Cluster teachers
according to their Proceeds to planning on the
conduct of IS
needs/quadrant
Submits result of
analysis to the EPS
Office of the CID-
EPS Chief
Office of the ASDS Office of the SDS
STAR STAR STAR
T T T
Checks the Schedule of Provides the EPS with Provides the EPS
Monitoring and Supervision with the CG/TG/LMs
SF 7 and checks
and accomplish the IS Log and the profiles of Presents Lesson
availability of teacher teacher to be Plan to the EPS
book
in the attendance log observed
book
Proceed to the school as
scheduled
Updates the EPS on Executes the
Updates the EPS on profiles of teacher to lesson
Proceed to the Principals profiles of teacher to be observed in
Office be observed relation to classroom
performance and
observations made.
Check SF 7 for teachers’ Joins the EPS for
schedule and attendance log classroom observation
book to determine if the proper Joins the EPS for
teacher to be observed is
classroom
present
observation proper
Proceed to the classroom
with the Principal/HT/MT
Classroom Observation
proper
PRINCIPAL and
EPS DEPARTMENT HEAD TEACHER
STAR STAR STAR
T T T
• Implementation Plan
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Resources
Activity Output Responsibility Due Date
/Budget
Content-based training Training design and CI Team April 11-15, MOOE
and development of IMS IMs 2016
Recruitment/Selection/H RQA/ Ranking of PSB January- May MOOE
iring of teacher Science teachers by 2017
applicants major area
Caravan of Model Lesson Plan EPS/CID Chief August-March
Demonstration Teaching 2017
Teacher Induction Attendance Sheet CI Team August 2017 MOOE
Program ASDS, HRMO,
AO
Roll out of Instructional TOC, Observation Log CI Team July 2016-
Supervision Book, 24 teachers March 2017
observed per month
Monitoring and Monitoring System CID Chief,
Evaluation ASDS
WHERE ARE WE NOW?
Principal/ Department
PROBLEM EPS School Heads Heads
• 6 out of 6 schools have •
OBJECTIVE submitted proposals for
Mobilized to submit
programs and projects
content-based training.
• To raise the • 5 out of 6 schools have
focused on specific
learning areas.
proficiency of subscribed to LEEP • Crafted instructional
• Initiated content-based
(Learning Effectively supervision plans
training and
all Earth development of IMS
thru Enhanced aligned with Division
Pedagogies) sponsored
Science • Rolled out instructional
by Knowledge Channel
programs.
supervision schemes • Reinforced classroom
Teachers in • Rolled out caravan of
• Embarked on school- management practices
based programs • Enhance preparation of
Grade 10 in the demonstration teaching
focusing on Daily Lesson Log, Daily
for teachers
content-based Teacher Quality Lesson Plans, Teaching
• Intensified monitoring
Circles Guides and Curriculum
and evaluation activities
test to 75% Enhanced Guides
mentoring •
MPS by the program
Benchmarking and
sharing of best practices
end of August, Learners (Three identified schools)
Enhancement
2016 Program