Climate Change & Ozone

Depletion
A REVIEW ON THE NATURE
OF THE ATMOSPHERE
 The atmosphere consists of
several layers
• A thin envelope of gases surrounding the
earth is called the atmosphere.
– The troposphere is the atmospheric layer
closest to the earth’s surface extending only
about 17 kilometers (11 miles) above sea
level at the equator and 8 kilometers (5 miles)
over the poles.
– The atmosphere’s second layer is the
stratosphere, which extends from about 17 to
about 48 kilometers (from 11 to 30 miles)
above the earth’s surface.
 The atmosphere consists of
several layers
• Ozone (O3) is concentrated in a portion of the
stratosphere called the ozone layer, found
roughly 17–30 kilometers (11–19 miles) above
sea level.
– Stratospheric ozone is produced when some of the
oxygen molecules there interact with ultraviolet (UV)
radiation emitted by the sun.
– This “global sunscreen” of ozone in the stratosphere
keeps out about 95% of the sun’s harmful UV
radiation from reaching the earth’s surface.
The earth’s atmosphere is a dynamic
system that includes 4 layers
 Atmospheric pressure (millibars)
0 200 400 600 800 1,000
120 75
Temperature
110
65
100
Thermosphere
90 55
Altitude (kilometers)

80

Altitude (miles)
70 Mesosphere 45

60
35
50
Stratosphere
40 25
30
Ozone layer 15
20
10 Troposphere 5
Pressure
(Sea 0 Pressure =
level) –80 –40 0 40 80 120 1,000 millibars
Temperature (˚C) at ground level
Fig. 15-2, p. 376
How might the earth’s climate
change in the future?
Weather and climate are not the
same
• Weather consists of short-term changes in atmospheric
variables, such as the temperature and precipitation in a
given area over a period of hours or days.
• Climate is determined by the average weather conditions of
the earth or of a particular area, especially temperature and
precipitation, over periods of at least three decades to
thousands of years.
• One or two warmer or colder years or decades can result
simply from changes in the weather; don’t necessarily tell
us that the earth’s climate is warming or cooling.
• Climate scientists look at data on normally changing
weather conditions to see if there has been a general rise
or fall in any measurements such as average temperature
or precipitation over a period of at least 30 years.
 Climate change is not new
• Over the past 3.5 billion years, the planet’s climate
has been altered by volcanic emissions, changes in
solar input, continents moving slowly atop shifting
tectonic plates, and other factors.
• Over the past 900,000 years, the atmosphere has
experienced prolonged periods of global cooling and
warming, known as glacial and interglacial periods.
• For roughly 10,000 years, we have lived in an
interglacial period characterized by a fairly stable
climate and a fairly steady average global surface
temperature.
 Climate change is not new
– For the past 1000 years, the average temperature of
the atmosphere has remained fairly stable but began
rising during the last century when people began
clearing more forests and burning more fossil fuels.
– Past temperature changes are estimated through
analysis of radioisotopes in rocks and fossils;
plankton and radioisotopes in ocean sediments; tiny
bubbles, layers of soot, and other materials trapped
in different layers of ancient air found in ice cores
from glaciers; pollen from the bottoms of lakes and
bogs; tree rings; and temperature measurements
taken regularly since 1861.
Estimated global average temperatures
and average temperature change
AVERAGE TEMPERATURE (over past 900,000 years AVERAGE TEMPERATURE (over past 130 years

TEMPERATURE CHANGE (over past 22,000 years TEMPERATURE CHANGE (over past 1,000 years

Stepped Art
Fig. 15-17, p. 389
 Human activities emit large
quantities of greenhouse gases
• A natural process called the greenhouse effect
occurs when some of the solar energy absorbed
by the earth radiates into the atmosphere as
infrared radiation (heat).
• Four greenhouse gases absorb the heat which
warms the lower atmosphere and the earth’s
surface, helping to create a livable climate.
– Water vapor (H2O).
– Carbon dioxide (CO2).
– Methane (CH4).
– Nitrous oxide (N2O).
 Human activities emit large
quantities of greenhouse gases
• Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in the
mid-1700s, human actions—mainly the burning of fossil
fuels—have led to significant increases in the levels of
greenhouse gases in the lower atmosphere.
• The average atmospheric concentration of CO2 rose
dramatically during that time, along with the average
temperature of the atmosphere
• The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
was established in 1988 to document past climate
changes and project future changes; its network includes
more than 2,500 climate scientists and scientists in
disciplines related to climate studies from more than 130
countries
 Human activities emit large
quantities of greenhouse gases
• In 2007, the IPCC issued a report based on more
than 29,000 sets of data, finding that:
– The earth’s lower atmosphere has warmed, especially
since 1980, due mostly to increased levels of CO2 and
other greenhouse gases.
– Most of these increases are due to human activities,
especially the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation.
– These human-induced changes are beginning to
change the earth’s climate.
– If greenhouse gas concentrations continue to rise, the
earth is likely to experience rapid atmospheric warming
and climate disruption during this century.
 Comparing atmospheric concentrations of
carbon dioxide (CO2) and the atmosphere’s
average temperature, 1880–2009
 Human activities emit large
quantities of greenhouse gases
• Evidence that the IPCC and other climate scientists
used to support the major conclusions of the 2007
IPCC report:
– Between 1906 and 2005, the average global surface
temperature has risen by about 0.74 C° (1.3 F°).
Primarily since 1980.
– Average levels of CO2 in the atmosphere rose sharply
between 1960 and 2010.
– The first decade in this century (2000–2009) was the
warmest decade since, and 2010 was the warmest year
on record.
– In some parts of the world, glaciers are melting and
floating sea ice is shrinking.
 Human activities emit large
quantities of greenhouse gases
– In 2010, NASA scientists reported on a survey of the
world’s major lakes, which showed that these lakes
have warmed since 1985 at rates of 0.81–1.8 Fo per
decade.
– During the 20th century, the world’s average sea level
rose by 19 centimeters (7 inches), mostly because of
runoff from melting land-based ice and the expansion of
ocean water as its temperature increased. By
comparison, sea levels rose about 2 centimeters (3/4 of
an inch) in the 18th century and 6 centimeters (2
inches) in the 19th century.
Much of Alaska’s Muir Glacier in Glacier Bay
National Park melted between 1948 and 2004
Satellite data shows a 39% drop in the average cover
of summer arctic sea ice between 1979 and 2010
 CO2 emissions play an
important role
• Data from the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) show that
the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide
rose from a level of 285 parts per million (ppm)
around 1850 at the start of the Industrial
Revolution, to 390 ppm in 2010, a 37% increase.
• Major climate models indicate a need to prevent
CO2 levels from exceeding 450 ppm—an
estimated threshold, or irreversible tipping point,
that could set into motion large-scale climate
changes for hundreds to thousands of years.
How CO2 emissions from the burning of fossil fuels in
selected countries increased between 1965 and 2009
 What role does the sun play?
• The energy output of the sun plays the key role in the
earth’s temperature and this output has varied over
millions of years, but separate studies concluded that
most of the rise in global average atmospheric
temperatures since 1980 could not be the result of
increased solar output.
• The atmosphere is now heating from the bottom up,
which indicates that inputs at the earth’s surface play an
important role.
• Since the mid-1970s, the sun’s output has remained
about the same and thus cannot account for the rise in
temperature since 1975.
 What role do oceans play in
projected climate disruption?
• The world’s oceans help to moderate the earth’s
average surface temperature, and thus its climate,
by removing about 25–30% of the CO2 pumped into
the lower atmosphere by human activities.
• The oceans absorb heat from the lower atmosphere
and currents slowly transfer some CO2 to the deep
ocean.
• The ability of the oceans to absorb CO2 decreases
as water temperatures increase, so as the oceans
warm up, some of their dissolved CO2 is released
into the lower atmosphere.
 What role do oceans play in
projected climate disruption?
• The upper portion of the oceans warmed by an
average of 0.32–0.67Cº (0.6–1.2Fº) during the
last century—an astounding increase
considering the huge volume of water involved—
most likely due to increasing atmospheric
temperatures.
• Increasing levels of CO2 in the ocean have
increased the acidity of its surface. This
threatens corals and other organisms with shells
made of calcium carbonate, which dissolves
when acidity reaches a certain level.
There is uncertainty about the effects of cloud
cover on projected atmospheric warming
• Warmer temperatures increase evaporation of
surface water and create more clouds, which
can either warm or cool the atmosphere.
• An increase in thick and continuous cumulus
clouds at low altitudes could decrease surface
warming by reflecting more sunlight back into
space.
• An increase in thin, wispy cirrus clouds at high
altitudes could increase the warming of the
lower atmosphere by preventing more heat from
escaping into space.
Section 15-5

WHAT ARE SOME POSSIBLE

EFFECTS OF A WARMER
ATMOSPHERE?
 Enhanced atmospheric warming
could have severe consequences
• During this century, we face a rapid increase in the
average temperature of the lower atmosphere.
• This is very likely to cause climate disruption, a
rapid change in the fairly mild climate that we have
had for the past 10,000 years.
• Such changes will determine where we can grow
food and how much of it we can grow; which areas
will suffer from increased drought and which will
experience increased flooding; and in what areas
people and many forms of wildlife can live.
 Enhanced atmospheric warming
could have severe consequences
• A 2003 U.S. National Academy of Sciences report
laid out a nightmarish worst-case scenario in
which human activities trigger new and abrupt
climate and ecological changes that could last for
thousands of years.
– Ecosystems collapsing.
– Floods in low-lying coastal cities.
– Forests consumed in vast wildfires.
– Grasslands, dried out from prolonged drought, turning
into dust bowls.
– Rivers and supplies of drinking and irrigation water
could dry up.
 Enhanced atmospheric warming
could have severe consequences
– Premature extinction of up to half of the world’s species.
– Prolonged droughts.
– More intense and longer-lasting heat waves.
– More destructive storms and flooding.
– Much colder weather in some parts of the world.
– Rapid spread of some infectious tropical diseases.
 Severe drought is likely to
increase
• Severe and prolonged drought affects at least 30% of
the earth’s land (excluding Antarctica).
• By 2059 up to 45% of the world’s land area could
experience extreme drought.
• Effects of increased drought could include:
– The growth of trees and other plants declines.
– Wildfires increase in frequency.
– Declining stream flows and less available surface water
– Falling water tables with more evaporation, worsened by farmers
irrigating more to make up for drier conditions.
– Shrinking lakes, reservoirs, and inland seas.
– Dwindling rivers.
– Water shortages for 1–3 billion people.
– Declining biodiversity.
 More ice and snow are likely to
melt
• Climate models predict that climate change will be the
most severe in the world’s polar regions.
• Light-colored ice and snow in these regions help to cool
the earth by reflecting incoming solar energy.
• The melting of such ice and snow exposes much darker
land and sea areas, which absorb more solar energy.
• Arctic atmospheric temperatures have risen almost twice
as fast as average temperatures in the rest of the world
during the past 50 years.
• Soot generated by North American, European, and
Asian industries is darkening arctic ice and lessening its
ability to reflect sunlight.
 More ice and snow are likely to
melt
• The overall projected long-term trend is for the
average summer ice coverage to decrease.
• During the past 25 years, many of the world’s
mountain glaciers have been melting and
shrinking at accelerating rates.
– Mountain glaciers are sources of water for drinking,
irrigation, and hydropower.
– Water, food, and power shortages could threaten
billions of people in Asia and South America as these
glaciers slowly melt over the next century or two.
 Sea levels are rising
• A 2008 U.S. Geological Survey report
concluded that the world’s average sea
level will most likely rise 0.8–2 meters (3–
6.5 feet) by the end of this century and
probably keep rising for centuries.
• Rising sea levels are due to the expansion
of seawater as it warms, and to the
melting of land-based ice.
 Sea levels are rising
• A 1-meter (3.3-foot) rise in the world’s
average sea level by 2100 could:
– degrade or destroy at least one-third of the
world’s coastal estuaries, wetlands, and coral
reefs
– disrupt many of the world’s coastal fisheries
– cause flooding and erosion of low-lying barrier
islands and gently sloping coastlines,
especially in U.S. coastal states
If the average sea level rises by 1 meter (3.3 feet),
the areas shown in red in Florida will be flooded
 Sea levels are rising
• The projected rise in sea levels would also:
– flood agricultural lowlands and deltas in coastal areas
where much of the world’s rice is grown.
– cause saltwater contamination of freshwater coastal
aquifers and decreased supplies of groundwater
needed for irrigation and drinking water supplies.
– submerge low-lying islands around the world, flooding
out a total population greater than that of the U.S.
– displace at least 150 million people from flooded
coastal cities
– threaten trillions of dollars worth of buildings, roads,
and other forms of infrastructure
 Extreme weather is likely to
increase in some areas
• Atmospheric warming will increase the
incidence and intensity of extreme weather
events.
– Kill large numbers of people.
– Reduce crop production
– Expand deserts
• A warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture,
so other areas will experience increased
flooding from heavy and prolonged
precipitation.
 Extreme weather is likely to
increase in some areas
• In some areas, global atmospheric warming
will likely lead to colder winter weather.
• The consensus view of the effect of
atmospheric warming on tropical storms and
hurricanes is that projected atmospheric
warming is likely lead to fewer but stronger
hurricanes that could cause more damage.
 Climate disruption is a threat
change will threaten biodiversity
• Projected climate disruption is likely to upset
ecosystems and decrease biodiversity in areas of
every continent.
• Approximately 30% of the land-based plant and
animal species assessed so far could disappear if
the average global temperature change exceeds
1.5–2.5ºC (2.7–4.5ºF).
• The hardest hit will be:
– Plant and animal species in colder climates
– Species at higher elevations
– Plant and animal species with limited ranges
– Those with limited tolerance for temperature change.
 Climate disruption is a threat
change will threaten biodiversity
• The populations of plant and animal species that
thrive in warmer climates could grow.
• The ecosystems most likely to suffer disruption
and species loss from climate change are:
– Coral reefs.
– Polar seas.
– Coastal wetlands.
– High-elevation mountaintops.
– Alpine and arctic tundra.
 Climate disruption is a threat
change will threaten biodiversity
• The warmer climate would increase populations
of insects and fungi that damage trees.
• Shifts in regional climate would also threaten
many existing state and national parks, wildlife
reserves, wilderness areas, and wetlands, along
with much of the biodiversity they contain.
Agriculture could face an overall
decline
• Crop productivity is projected to increase slightly
at middle to high latitudes with moderate
atmospheric warming, but decrease if warming
goes too far (2007 IPCC report).
• Climate change models predict a decline in
agricultural productivity in tropical and subtropical
regions.
• Flooding of river deltas due to rising sea levels
could reduce crop production in these areas and
fish production in nearby coastal aquaculture
ponds.
Agriculture could face an overall
decline
• Food production could also decrease in farm
regions that are dependent on rivers fed by snow
and glacial melt, and in any arid and semiarid
areas where droughts become more prolonged.
– These disruptions could be largely unpredictable
because of the projected increase in extreme weather
as a result of a warmer atmosphere.
• By 2050, some 200–600 million of the world’s
poorest and most vulnerable people could face
starvation and malnutrition due to the effects of
projected climate disruption.
A warmer world is likely to threaten
the health of many people
• More frequent and prolonged heat waves in
some areas will increase numbers of deaths and
illnesses, especially among older people, people
in poor health, and the urban poor who cannot
afford air conditioning.
• Hunger and malnutrition will increase in areas
where agricultural production drops.
• A warmer, CO2-rich world will favor rapidly
multiplying insects, microbes, toxic molds, and
fungi that make us sick, and plants that produce
pollens that cause allergies and asthma attacks.
A warmer world is likely to threaten
the health of many people
• Microbes that cause infectious tropical diseases
such as dengue fever and yellow fever are likely to
expand their ranges and numbers if mosquitoes
that carry them spread to warmer temperate and
higher elevation areas as they have begun to do.
• A 2009 study estimated that climate disruption
already contributes to the premature deaths of
more than 300,000 people, and that 325 million
people are now seriously affected by accelerating
climate change through natural disasters and
environmental degradation.
 The orange-colored trees are those that are
dead or dying—killed by mountain pine beetles
 Areas in blue show counties in 28 U.S. states where
one or both species of mosquitoes that transmit dengue
fever have been found as of 2005
Section 15-6

WHAT CAN WE DO TO SLOW

PROJECTED CLIMATE
CHANGE?
 What are our options?
• Calling for urgent action at the national and
international levels to curb greenhouse gas
emissions by regulating and taxing such
emissions will not work.
– Psychological research indicates that using fear and
guilt, and promoting sacrifice to change behavior
rarely works.
– People are primarily interested in the short-term, not
long-term, benefits of changing their behavior.
– For elected officials whose future depends on running
every few years, spending their efforts on long-term
problems is most often not in their best short-term.
 What are our options?
• Important short-term benefits for individuals,
corporations, schools, and universities of
working locally to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions include:
– Money saved from cutting energy use and waste;
better health because of cleaner air; more jobs in the
less polluting and more cost-competitive domestic
wind and solar industries
– Improved national and economic security due to
reduced dependence on imported oil.
 What are our options?
• Most climate scientists argue that our most urgent
priority is to do all we can to avoid any and all climate
change tipping points—thresholds beyond which natural
systems can change irreversibly.
• There are two basic approaches to dealing with the
projected harmful effects of global climate disruption.
– Mitigation is to act to slow it and avoid tipping points.
– Adaptation is to recognize that some climate change is
unavoidable and to try to reduce some of its harmful effects.
• Some say that climate change will provide economic
opportunity and that making a shift to a low-carbon
economy will lead us into a new era of economic growth
and prosperity.
Scientists have come up with this list of
possible climate change tipping points
 Preventing and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions
• Four major prevention strategies.
– Improve energy efficiency to reduce fossil fuel use,
especially the use of coal.
– Shift from nonrenewable carbon-based fossil fuels to
a mix of low-carbon renewable energy resources
based on local and regional availability.
– Stop cutting down tropical forests and plant trees to
help remove more CO2 from the atmosphere.
– Shift to more sustainable and climate-friendly
agriculture.
 Ways to slow atmospheric warming and
projected climate disruption during this century
 Preventing and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions
• Output, or cleanup, strategies focus on
dealing with CO2 after it has been produced.
– Carbon capture and storage, or CCS, involves
removing CO2 from the smokestacks of coal-
burning power and industrial plants and storing it
deep underground in abandoned coal beds and
oil and gas fields or under the sea floor.
• Stored CO2 would have to remain sealed from the
atmosphere forever because leaks could
dramatically increase atmospheric warming in a
very short time.
 Preventing and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions
• Focus on reducing and preventing greenhouse
gas emissions, as soon as possible.
• Some scientists urge us to increase efforts to
reduce emissions of other greenhouse gases.
– Methane (CH4) is 25 times more effective in warming
the atmosphere than CO2.
– Soot is accumulating on glaciers and ice fields and
contributing to the melting of this ice and to
atmospheric warming.
 Preventing and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions
• Geo-engineering or trying to manipulate natural
conditions to counter an enhanced greenhouse
effect.
– Injecting sulfate particles into the stratosphere to
reflect some of the incoming sunlight into space and
cool the troposphere.
– Placing a series of giant mirrors in orbit above the
earth for the same purpose.
• One major problem with most of these fixes is
that they require huge investments of energy
and materials, and there is no guarantee that
they will work.
 Preventing and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions
• If we rely on these systems and continue
emitting greenhouse gases, and if the systems
then fail, atmospheric temperatures will likely
soar at a rapid rate, greatly speeding up the
processes of climate disruption.
 Governments can help to reduce
the threat of climate disruption
• Governments can use six major methods to
promote the solutions.
– Strictly regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane
(CH4).
– Phase out the most inefficient polluting coal-burning
power plants and replace them with more efficient,
cleaner natural gas and renewable energy such as wind
power.
– Tax each unit of CO2 or CH4 emitted or burned by fossil
fuel use, and offsetting these tax increases by reducing
taxes on income, wages, and profits.
– Use a cap-and-trade system.
Governments can help to reduce
the threat of climate disruption
– Replace government subsidies and tax breaks for the fossil
fuels industry and industrialized food production with energy
efficiency technologies, low-carbon renewable energy
sources, and more sustainable agriculture.
– Focus research and development efforts on innovations that
lower the cost of clean energy alternatives, so that they can
compete more favorably with fossil fuels.
– Finance and monitor efforts to reduce deforestation—which
accounts for 12% to 17% of global greenhouse gas
emissions—and to promote global tree-planting efforts.
– Encourage more-developed countries to help fund the
transfer of the latest energy-efficiency and cleaner energy
technologies to less-developed countries so that they can
bypass older, energy wasting and polluting technologies.
 Governments can help to reduce
the threat of climate disruption
• Many say that the most critical goal for governments is
to find ways to put a price on carbon emissions.
• The resulting higher costs for fossil fuels may spur
innovation in finding ways to reduce carbon emissions,
improve energy efficiency, and phase in a mix of
cleaner, low-carbon renewable energy alternatives.
• Establishing laws and regulations that raise the price
of fossil fuels is politically difficult because of the
immense political and economic power of the fossil
fuel industries.
 Governments can help to reduce
the threat of climate disruption
• In December 1997, delegates from 161 nations met in
Kyoto, Japan, to negotiate a treaty to slow global warming
and its projected climate disruption.
– The Kyoto Protocol went into effect in 2005 with 187 of the
world’s 194 countries (not including the U.S.) ratifying the
agreement by late 2009.
– Requires the 36 participating more-developed countries to
cut their emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O to certain levels by
2012, when the treaty expires.
– Less-developed countries were excluded from this
requirement, because such reductions would curb their
economic growth.
– Negotiations have failed to extend the original agreement
after 2012.
Government interventions have
advantages and disadvantages
 Some countries, states and
localities are leading the way
• Costa Rica aims to be the first country to
become carbon neutral by cutting its net carbon
emissions to zero by 2030.
• China has one of the world’s most intensive
energy efficiency programs.
• By 2010, at least 30 U.S. states had set goals
for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
• Since 1990, local governments in more than 650
cities around the world (including more than 450
U.S. cities) have established programs to reduce
their greenhouse gas emissions.
 Some companies are reducing
their carbon footprints
• Leaders of some of the most prominent U.S.
companies, including Alcoa, DuPont, Ford Motor
Company, General Electric, Johnson & Johnson,
PepsiCo, and Shell Oil, have joined with leading
environmental organizations to form the U.S.
Climate Action Partnership.
– Called on the government to enact strong national
climate change legislation.
– Profit opportunity in developing or using energy-
efficient and cleaner-energy technologies, such as
fuel-efficient cars, wind turbines, and solar cells.
 Individual choices make a
difference
• Each of us plays a part in the projected
acceleration of atmospheric warming and
climate disruption during this century.
Whenever we use energy generated by
fossil fuels, for example, we add a certain
amount of CO2 to the atmosphere. Each
use of energy adds to an individual’s
carbon footprint, the amount of carbon
dioxide generated by one’s lifestyle.
You can reduce your annual
emissions of CO2
 We can prepare for climate
change
• The world needs to make a 50–85% cut in
emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050 to
stabilize concentrations of these gases in the
atmosphere which would help prevent the planet
from heating up by more than 2ºC (3.6ºF) and to
head off rapid changes in the world’s climate
and the projected harmful effects that would
result.
• Also should begin to prepare for the likely
harmful effects of projected climate disruption.
 A no-regrets strategy
• What if it turns out that the climate models
are wrong and atmospheric warming is not
a serious threat?
– Should we abandon the search for preventive
solutions?
• No, we should begin implementing changes now
as a no-regrets strategy.
• Changes should be implemented because they will
lead to very important environmental, health, and
economic benefits.
Section 15-7

HOW HAVE WE DEPLETED

OZONE IN THE STRATOSPHERE
AND WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT
IT?
 Our use of certain chemicals
threatens the ozone layer
• A layer of ozone in the lower stratosphere keeps
about 95% of the sun’s harmful ultraviolet (UV-A and
UV-B) radiation from reaching the earth’s surface.
• Measurements show considerable seasonal
depletion (thinning) of ozone concentrations in the
stratosphere above Antarctica and the Arctic and a
lower overall ozone thinning everywhere except over
the tropics.
• Ozone depletion in the stratosphere poses a serious
threat to humans, other animals, and some primary
producers (mostly plants) that use sunlight to
support the earth’s food webs.
A massive ozone thinning over Antarctica
during several months in 2009
 Our use of certain chemicals
threatens the ozone layer
• Problem began with the discovery of the
first chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) in 1930 and
later Freon.
– Popular non-toxic, inexpensive coolants in air
conditioners and refrigerators, propellants in
aerosol spray cans, cleaners for electronic
parts such as computer chips, fumigants for
granaries and ship cargo holds, and gases
used to make insulation and packaging.
– CFCs are persistent chemicals that destroy
the ozone layer.
 Why should we worry about
ozone depletion?
• More biologically damaging UV-A and UV-
B radiation will reach the earth’s surface.
• Causes problems with human health, crop
yields, forest productivity, climate change,
wildlife populations, air pollution, and
degradation of outdoor materials.
Decreased levels of ozone in the stratosphere can
have a number of harmful effects
You can reduce your exposure
to harmful UV radiation
 We can reverse stratospheric
ozone depletion
• The problem of ozone depletion has been
tackled quite impressively.
• In 2008, the area of ozone thinning was still near
its record high of 29 million square kilometers
(11 million square miles), set in 2006.
• Models indicate that even with immediate and
sustained action.
– About 60 years for the earth’s ozone layer to recover
the levels of ozone it had in 1980.
– About 100 years for recovery to pre-1950 levels.
 We can reverse stratospheric
ozone depletion
• In 1987, representatives of 36 nations met in
Montreal, Canada, and developed the Montreal
Protocol to cut emissions of CFCs.
• In 1992, adopted the Copenhagen Protocol, an
amendment that accelerated the phase-out of
key ozone-depleting chemicals signed by 195
countries.
• The ozone protocols set an important precedent
by using prevention to solve a serious
environmental problem.
 Three big ideas
• All countries need to step up efforts to control and
prevent outdoor and indoor air pollution.
• Reducing the projected harmful effects of rapid climate
disruption during this century requires emergency action
to increase energy efficiency, sharply reduce
greenhouse gas emissions, rely more on renewable
energy resources, and slow population growth.
• We need to continue phasing out the use of chemicals
that have reduced ozone levels in the stratosphere and
allowed more harmful ultraviolet radiation to reach the
earth’s surface.