Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Types of protocols
Protocols
1.Short /Flare
1.Long Follicular 2.Microflare
2.Long Luteal
-Minidose protocol
-Stop protocol
3.Long Follicular
Depot
4. Long Luteal
Depot
5. Ultra long
Long Follicular Protocol
Gnrh Agonist daily Gonadotropins
28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
1st month 2nd month 3rd month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Till Hcg criteria is reached
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
OPU
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
• DISADVANTAGES
PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS
Brief initial agonist phase-
FLARE mimics follicular
phase FSH surge
Later- suppression of
premature LH surge
Short/Flare Protocol
Gnrh Agonist Daily Gonadotropins
OPU
Reduces excessive
suppression
Reduced amount of
GnRH-a
Less amount of Gn
Reduced flexibility
DISADVANTAGES
Micro-dose Flare Protocol
MICRODOSE GnRH-a FLARE PROTOCOL
• OCPs 14-21days
OPU
OPU
There is moderate quality evidence that the use of GnRH antagonist compared with
long-cour se GnRH agonist protocols is associated with a substantial reduction in
OHSS without reducing the likelihood of achieving live birth
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001750.
Long agonist versus Antagonist in POR
Study typ protocol Result
e
Prapas, 2013 RCT 362 pts por CPR similar.
1) 162pts-Long agonist More cancellations
2) 168 pts- antagonist but not significant in
Antagonist
Sunkara et al RCT 110 PTS No of oocytes
2014 1) LONG- Naferelin 400 mcg 200 retrieved -long >
mcgfrom 21 day short agonist regimen
Gnd-450 iu after 2 wks , long agonist =
2)Flare- Nafarelin 200mcg from day 2 antagonist regimens .
f/b gnd-450 iu Dur. of stimulation
3)Cetrorelix 0.25 mg fixed protocol and total gnd dose
-long agonist>short
agonist and
antagonist regimens.
The ongoing PR was
8.1% with long and
short agonist
regimens and 16.2%
with the antagonist
regimen
Long versus short protocol
37 RCTs, 3872 women
Included 37 RCTs (3872 women), one ongoing trial, and one trial awaiting
classification.
These trials made nine different comparisons between protocols. Twenty of the RCTs
compared long protocols and short protocols.
Only 19/37 RCTs reported live birth or ongoing pregnancy.
There was no evidence of a difference in live birth and ongoing pregnancy rates
between the two protocols (odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94
to 1.81; 12 RCTs, n = 976 women, I² = 15%, low quality evidence)
Siristatidis CS, Gibreel A, Basios G, Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD006919.
CLINICAL PREGNANCY RATE
CONTD...
There was evidence of an increase in clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18 to
1.92; 20 RCTs, n = 1643 women, I² = 27%, moderate quality evidence) in the long
protocol group when compared with the short protocol group (Analysis 1.2; Figure 6).
The subgroup of studies including poor responders only also showed a difference in
clinical pregnancy rates (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.39 to 7.02; four RCTs, n = 232 women, I² =
0%, moderate quality evidence), favouring the long protocol
• No. Of oocytes retreived- Significant difference in
favor of long protocol(six studies, but lot of
heterogenity)
• Number of ampoules of gonadotrophins- significant
differance in favor of long protocol
• Cycle cancellation rate- No difference
SHORT VERSUS ANTAGONIST
CYCLE
Merviel et al. Reproductive Health (2015) 12:52
• 48 POR patients
48 POR patients
24 patients 24 patients
Micro flare Gnrh antagonist
Leupride acetate Fixed protocol
40 mcg bd Cetrorelix 0.25 mg
Study Typ Protocol Result
e
Demirol RCT 90 PTS No of oocytes retreive were mord
2010 1) Microflare in flare protocol.Implantation rate
2) Antagonist greater in microflare.cpr and
fertilization rate were similar
The duration of stimulation (WMD: 0.52 days, 95% CI: 1.48 to þ0.44; fixed effects model)
and the number of ampoules of gonadotropins required (WMD: þ4.11 ampoules, 95% CI:
28.82 to þ37.03) were not significantly different between women down-regulated with a
short agonist protocol and those treated by an antagonist protocol.
However, significantly less COCs were retrieved (WMD: 1.07 COCs, 95% CI: 1.78 to 0.36)
in women who received GnRH antagonists compared with those who received GnRH
agonists.
How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review
and meta-analysis Dimitra Kyrou, M.D., Efstratios M. Kolibianakis, M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D., Christos A. Venetis, M.D.,
M.Sc., Evangelos G. Papanikolaou, M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D., John Bontis, M.D., Ph.D., and Basil C. Tarlatzis, M.D., Ph.D.2009
Gnrh flare vs Antagonist protocol
There was no evidence of a difference in the number of live birth and ongoing
pregnancies when GnRHa was stopped compared with when it was continued
(OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.33; three RCTs, n = 290 women, I² = 0%, low quality
evidence)
Normo-
PCOS POR Endometriosis
responders
• Antagonist • Microflare • Depot • Antagonist
protocol • Short protocol • Long agonist
• Antagonist • Ultralong
protocol
• Mild
stimulation
• Long agonist
Conclusion
• Hyper-responders-
Antagonist protocol of choice
(Al- Inany cochranne study 2016)
• Endometriosis, aenomyosis
Ultralong , Long depot
(Alberqueue cochrane review 2015)
Normoresponders
Antagonist= Long agonist> Short agonist protocol
Sirsitadis cochrane review, Al Inany review
Poor Ovarian responders
Inconclusive evidence
Pandian cochrane study 2010,
• Leuprolide has a half life of 90 minutes
whereas nafarelin's half life is 3-4 hours,
triptorelin's half life is 4,2 hours. Leuprolide is
50-80 times, nafarelin 200 times, triptorelin
36-144 times more powerful than the natural
GnRH (2,3).