MWF 8:00-9:00pm E33 B4-57 Group 3 DISCOURSE It is a mode, category or expression. In grammar, we speak of discourse as direct or indirect: Direct: She said, “I’m sleepy.” Indirect: She said that she was sleepy.
Discourse is also used more to specifically
mean “discussion” as in Descartes’ Discourse or Method. DISCOURSE
refers to two ways of speaking that are
bound to physiological, political, professional, cultural or sociological communities It is also the way in which the use of language in a particular domain helps to constitute the object it refers to. RHETORIC the art of PERSUATION. It has to do with the presentation of ideas in clearer, persuasive language. The founder of rhetoric is believed to have been Corax of Syracuse. RHETORIC According to Aristotelian concept: rhetoric was an effectively organizing material for presentation of truth, for an appeal to the intellect. It was distinct from poetry, a manner of composition presenting ideas emotionally. As Isocrates once noted, “The art of making great matters small, and small things great”. RHETORIC Along with grammar and logic, rhetoric made up the TRIVIUM of academic study.
Subdivisions of rhetoric by classical students following
Aristotle‘s lead: • The“deliberative” (having to do with deliberation of public action). • The “forensic” (from forum”- having to do with legal decisions of guilt and innocence). • The “epidetic” (having to do with formal praise). RHETORIC DURING MIDDLE AGES rhetoric was continued as a MODERN EDUCATION serious study through this RETORIC place in a phase of study in courses in the trivium, and elaborate composition and persists in rhetorical systems kept alive debating and oratorical an contests. interest in the forms of expression. According to Dr. Brock, who was once invited as speaker in school in Connecticut about writing, Editing is not easy, it is not fun. It‘s hard and lonely, and the words seldom just flowed. • He said rewriting is an essence of writing and that professional writers rewrite their sentences repeatedly and then write what they have rewritten. • Professional writer must establish a daily schedule and stick to it. • Feeling depressed or unhappy won‘t affect one‘s effective editing. GOOD WRITING Good writing has an aliveness that keeps the reader reading from one paragraph to the next, and it‘s not a question of gimmick to “personalize” the author. It‘s question of using the English language in a way that will achieve the greatest strength and the least clutter. Can such principles be taught? Maybe not. But most of them can be learned. Here are some considerations for good writing:
1. Simplicity 2. Clutter 3. Style 4. The audience 5. Words 6. Usage 7. Forms 8. Unity SIMPLICITY
Is the state or quality of being simple. Something easy to
understand or explain seems simple, in contrast to something complicated. In art, Simplicity is Beauty; in writing, simplicity is good writing. We are a society strangling in unnecessary word, circular constructions, pompous frills and meaningless jargon. Viscous language of everyday commerce and enterprise like: business letter, the interoffice memo, the corporation report, the notice from the bank explaining its latest ”simplified” statement contributes to a cluttered writing. The jargons from different fields that have to be understood by a specific group of people using the language like: What member an insurance or medical plan can decipher the brochure that describes what coasts and benefits are. The pilot who announces that he is presently anticipating considerable precipitation wouldn‘t dream saying that it may rain. The sentence is too simple – there must be something wrong with it. But the secret of good writing is to strip every sentence to its cleanest components. Every word that serves no function; every long word that could be a short word; every adverb that carries the same meaning that‘s already in the verb; every passive construction that leaves the reader unsure of who is doing what- there are thousand and one adulterants that weaken the strength of a sentence. How can writers achieve the freedom from clutter? • Clear out heads with clutter. Clear thinking becomes clear writing; one can exist without the other. It‘s impossible for a muddy thinker to write good English. • Don‘t lead the reader to be an exclusive reader. The reader is someone with an attention span about of about sixty seconds- a person assailed by forces competing for the minutes that might otherwise be spent on a magazine or a book. A person snoozing in a chair holding a magazine or a book is a person who a being was given too much unnecessary trouble by the writer. • Carelessness of the writers can come in numerous forms. Perhaps a sentence is so excessively cluttered that the reader, hacking through the verbiage, simply doesn‘t know what it means. Perhaps a sentence has been so shoddily constructed the reader could read it in any several ways. Perhaps the writer has switched pronouns in mid-sentence, or has switched tense, so the reader loses track of who is talking or when the action took place. Perhaps Sentence B is not a logical sequel to Sentence A – the writer, in whose head the connection is clear, hasn‘t bothered to provide the missing link. Perhaps the writer has used an important word incorrectly by not taking the trouble to look it up. The writer may think that “Sanguine” and “Sanquity” mean the same thing but the difference is a bid one. The reader can only inter ( speaking of big differences) what the writer is trying to imply ( Zinsser, W1990) • Writers must constantly ask: what am I trying to say? Surprisingly often they do not know. They must look at what they have written and ask: have I said it? Is it clear to someone encountering the subject for the first time? If it‘s not, that is because some fuzz has worked its way into the machinery. The clear writer is someone clearheaded enough to see this stuff for what it is; fuzz. • Thinking clearly is a conscious act that writers must force upon themselves, just as if they were embarking on any other project that requires logic; adding up a laundry list or doing an algebra probe. Good writing doesn‘t come naturally, though most people obviously think it does. • Writing is hard work. A clear sentence is no accident. Very few sentences come out right the first time, or even the third time. Remember this as a consolation in moments of despair. If you find writing is hard, it‘s because it is hard. It‘s one of the hardest things that people do. Persuasive Writing A persuasive or argument, style to used to convince the reader of a particular position or point of view. The author discusses his or her opinion, in which often leads to a writing that is biased. Of course, a strong argument should have a plenty of facts, data, and reasoning used to convince the reader too. The author should focus on:
• ethos (credibility)
• logos (logic of the argument)
• pathos (emotional appeal to
the reader) in order to craft an effective argument. A Persuasive Essay ends with a call to action to the reader, trying to convince them to side with author and take appropriate action.
For example, the author could discuss the
benefits of becoming an organ donor. Then, the conclusion could include a call to action, encouraging the readers to visit their states organ donor registry to sign up. Persuasive Example: The introduction to this persuasive speech discusses the importance of refraining from fads diets for more effective methods. The author provides statistics and a direct quote to support his or her ideas of what those more effective methods should be. Narrative Writing A narrative tells a story. It includes: • Characters • A plot • Setting Narratives • Dialoguecan be used in fiction or non fiction writing. • and action. Most narratives are told sequentially with beginning, middle, and end. The author may choose first person narrative to tell the story from their point of view or the point of view of one of the characters in the story. • Narratives are used in novels, short stories, personal essays, anecdotes, biographies, and oral histories Narrative Example: The following example contains an excerpt from the story. Notice dialogue, characters, and enfolding plot: As I cooked bacon and eggs over the stove, fog gathered along the window. It was a cold winter morning- one of those mornings when you decide to stay inside. I called to Roger, “ Breakfast is ready! Come get it while its hot” I heard some rummaging upstairs. Only the promise of a hearty meal could get him out of bed on a day like this. Audience Who you are writing for.
If you know who you are writing for, you can
make good decisions about what information to include, as well as your tone and language in conveying it. Audience Is a very generalized group of readers.
Keeping your audience in mind while you write can
help you make good decisions about what material to include, how to organize your ideas, and how best to support your argument. Use the following questions to help you identify your audience and what You can do to address their wants and needs: • Who is your audience? • Might you have more than one audience? If so, how many audiences do you have? List them. • Does your assignment itself give any clues about your audience? • What does your audience need? What do they want? What do they value? • What is most important to them? What are they least likely to care about? • What kind of organization would best help your audience understand and appreciate your argument? • What do you have to say (or what are you doing in your research) that might surprise your audience? • What do you want your audience to think, learn, or assume about you? • What impression do you want you‘re writing or your research to convey? Reading your own drafts Writers tend to read over their own papers pretty quickly, with the knowledge of what they are trying to argue already in their minds. Reading in this way can cause you to skip over gaps in your written argument because the gap-filler is in your head. Putting yourself in the reader’s position Instead of reading your draft as if you wrote it and know what you meant, try reading it as if you have no previous knowledge of the material. Have you explained enough? Are the connections clear? These techniques can help you read your paper in the same way your reader will and make revisions that help your reader understand your argument.