THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE FISHBOWL TO ENHANCE

SPEAKING VIEWED FROM THE STUDENTS’ SELF-

ESTEEM
An Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Blitar
in the Academic Year 2018/2019

ULFAH ALIFAH YULIARSO

150221605568
THE PREVIOUS STUDY

Rahma, Dewanti Mulki. (2014). The Fishbowl Method to Improve

The Students’ Speaking Skill. An Experimental Study in Ninth
Grade Students of SMPN 2 Ambarawa in the Academic Year of
2014/2015. English Department of Education Faculty State
Islamic Studies Institute (STAIN) Salatiga.
THE TERMS CLARIFICATION

FISHBOWL
Silberman (1996:110) defines that Fishbowl is a discussion format that some students
make discussion circle and other students make listener circle in around of discussion group.

METHOD
Brown (2000:16) defines that method is a generalized set of classroom specifications for
accomplishing linguistic objectives. Method tends to be concerned primary with teacher and students
roles and behaviors and secondarily with such features as linguistic and subject-matter objectives,
sequencing, and materials.
SPEAKING
Tarigan (1990:3-4) defines that speaking is a language skill that is developed in child life,
which is produced by listening skill, and at that period speaking skill is learned.
 1 The students’ inability to speak in English
is caused by a number of factors.

2 Most of the students never practice to

speak English with their friends formally
or informally.
3 Most of the students feel afraid of making

THE mistakes in front of the class.

BACKGROUND 4 Most of the students have low self-esteem.

Most of the students seem do not have the

5
ideas in their mind if the are asked to
practice their speaking

6 fishbowl is one of potential activities

that students can aim to arrive at a
conclusion, share ideas about an event, or
4 find solution in this activity.
 THE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The Setting of The Research

At SMAN 1 Blitar in the Academic Year of 2018/2019

The Research Design

An Experimental Research is the traditional approach to conducting quantitative research. It
is used to establish possible cause and effect between dependent and independent variable
(Cresswell, 2008: 298-299).

The Sample
The experimental group, XI Science 4 which consist of 32 students (24 girls and 8 boys)
The control group, XI Science 5 which consist of 32 students (22 girls and 10 boys)
 THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS & THE OBJECTIVES

1. Is The Fishbowl more effective 1. To know the effectiveness of

than Guided Speaking to enhance
speaking at the eleventh grade
students of SMAN 1 Blitar in the
academic year of 2018/2019?
The Fishbowl than The Guided
Speaking to enhance speaking at
the eleventh grade students of
SMAN 1 Blitar in the academic
year of 2018/2019.
 HYPHOTHESIS VERIFICATION
THE NULL HYPOTHESIS (H₀)
There is no difference in the effectiveness
between the fishbowl and the guided speaking
to enhance speaking at the eleventh grade
students of SMAN 1 Blitar in the academic
year of 2018/2019.
THE ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS (H₀)
There is difference in the effectiveness
between the fishbowl and the guided speaking
to enhance speaking at the eleventh grade
students of SMAN 1 Blitar in the academic
year of 2018/2019.
H₀ will be rejected if the level of
significance < 5%

H₁will not be rejected if if the level of

significance > 5%
 Technique of Collecting The Data

THE INSTRUMENT

ORAL PRESENTATION QUESTIONNAIRES

(speaking achievement) (students self-esteem)

- The item is topic discussion The writer provides 50 questions

- Grammar, pronunciation, vocabulary,
fluency and comprehension
- Speaking rubric
 Technique of Collecting The Data

QUESTIONNAIRES
(students self-esteem)

- Rosenberg self-esteem scale

- The writer provides 50 questions 1st class: fish bowl (experimental group)
- Measure validity & reliability High
- Assess the students’ self-esteem Low
- It will be classified into the 2nd class: guided speaking (control group)
students high self-esteem and the High
students low self-esteem in Low
learning speakin (Each class is
divided into two groups)
 Technique of Analyzing The Data
Use Analysis of Variance
(ANOVA)
1st class: fish bowl (A1)
High (B1) (A1 B1)
Low (B2) (A1 B2)
It is divided into 8 group 2nd class: guided speaking (A2)
High (B1) (A2 B1)
Low (B2) (A2 B2)

Counting the mean scores

Counting with analysis of

variance formula
THE BENEFIT OF THE STUDY
FOR THE RESEARCHER
This research can contribute the
researcher to help to find out the best
method for teaching speaking.
FOR THE TEACHER
This research not only can give
additional contribution to English
teachers to develop language teaching
method, but also the teachers are able
to improve the quality of teaching
learning process.
13
Thank You!
Any Questions?