people by the use of technology is completely another story. They may draw inspiration from them, but they are not necessarily determined and directed by them. However, the application, use and distribution of technology require ethical standards and even legal provisions set by the local and international government. THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION OF THE CENTURY IS: What will our ethics be? Are there “win- win” ways to gain the advantages without sacrificing our humanity? Can we bio-minds teach newer kind of ethics? Is it time to regulate mass technology application? THE ETHICAL DILEMMAS AND POLICY ISSUES FOR 2015 1.REAL-TIME SATELLITE SURVEILLANCE VIDEO • Companies such as Planet Labs, Skybox Imaging (recently purchased by Google), have launched lots of satellites with the purpose of recording the status of the entire earth in real time. • In the world, we have many satellite, some smaller, and more sophisticated. They give us information and also images, which they take from the outside. • They are design for earth observation to give us information. They can inform us about the environmental meteorology and such. • It could affect society because of the lack of privacy; people might feel like they are being spied. • In terms of politics, the government could use all the satellites to solve crimes. • The government is going to control this so they could illegally been spying business rivals and countries also stealing or classified information. How do we choose what should be observed and how frequent? Should we use this information to solve criminalities? What is the possible for misuse by corporation, governments, policies departments, private citizens, or terrorists and other “bad actors”? 2. ASTRONAUT BIOETHICS (OF COLONIZING MARS) The colonization of Mars and plans for long-term space missions are already ongoing. On December 5, NASA launched the Orion spacecraft and NASA Administrator Charles Bolden declared it “DAY ONE OF THE MARS ERA”. The company MarsOne is preparing to launch a robotic mission to Mars in 2018, with succeeding humans in 2025. The 418 men and 287 women from around the world are presently competing for the four spots on the first one-way human settlement mission. But as we watch with interest as this clarifies, we might ask ourselves the following: Is it moral to expose people to unknown levels of human separation and physical danger (including exposure to radiation) for such purpose? Will these pioneers lack privacy for the rest of their lives so that we might watch what happens? Given the potential dangers of setting up a new colony strictly lacking in resources, how would sick colonists be cared for? 3. WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY We are presently involved to multiple technologies that monitor our behaviors. The development of dozens of bracelets and clip-on devices that monitor steps taken, activity levels, heart rate, etc., not to mention the advent of organic electronics that can be layered, printed, painted, or grown on human skin has led by the fitness tracking craze. Google is partnering with Novartis to create a contact lens the monitor blood sugar levels in diabetics and leads the information to healthcare providers. Wearable have the potential to teach us, protect our health, as well as violate our privacy in any amount of ways. 4. STATE-SPONSORED HACKTIVISM AND ‘SOFT WAR’ “Soft war” is a concept used to explain rights and duties of insurgents (and even terrorists) during armed struggle. Soft war incorporates tactics other than armed force to achieve political ends. Cyber war and hacktivism could be tools of soft war, through certain ways by states in inter-state conflict, as opposed to isolated individuals or groups (like “Anonymous”). We already live in a state of low-intensity cyber conflict. 5.ENHANCED PATHOGENS Gain of function research, in itself, is not detrimental: in fact, it is used to provide vital understandings into viruses and how to treat them. But when it is used to increase mammalian transmissibility and virulence, the altered viruses pose serious security and biosafety risks. 6.Non- Lethal Weapons Primarily it may seem ridiculous that kinds of weapons that have been around since WW1 and not designed to kill could be an evolving ethical or policy dilemma. Considering the recent development and production of non-lethal weapons such as laser missiles, blinding weapons, pain rays, sonic weapons, electric weapons, heat trays, disabling malodor ants, as well as the use of gases and sprays in both the military and domestic police forces. 7. Robot Swarms
Harvard University researches newly created a
group of 1000 robots, capable of communicating with each other to perform simple tasks such as ordering themselves into shapes and patterns. No human intervention is required in these “kilobots” beyond the original set of instructions and work together to complete tasks. These tiny robots are based on the group behavior of insects also can be used to perform environmental cleanups or answer to disasters where humans fear to tread. The concept of driverless cars also relies on this system, where the cars themselves would communicate with each other to obey traffic laws and transport people safely to their destinations. Should we be worried about the ethical and policy consequences of letting robots work collected without human interference? If a robot malfunctions and causes harm what will happen? Who would be blamed for such an accident? What if tiny swarms of robots could be set up to spy or sabotage? 8.ARTIFICIAL LIFE FORMS
Research on artificial life forms is a range of
synthetic biology focused on custom-building life forms to address specific purposes. Synthetic life allows scientists to study the origins of life by building it rather than breaking it down, but this technique blurs the line between life, and machines, and scientists foresee the ability to program organisms. Making artificial life forms has been deemed “playing God” because it allows individuals to create life that does not exist naturally. Gene patents have been a concern for several years now and synthetic organisms suggest a new dimension of this policy issue. While customized organisms may one day cure cancer, they may also be used as biological weapons. 9.RESILIENT SOCIAL- ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Resilient systems endure external pressures such
caused by climate change, natural disasters, and economic globalization. A resilient electrical system is able to stand extreme weather events or regain functionality quickly afterwards is an example. A resilient ecosystem can maintain a complex web of life when one or more organism is over exploited. The system is stressed by climate change. To what way is it the responsibility of the federal government to assure that civil infrastructure is resilient to environmental changes? When individuals act in their self-interest, there is the unique possibility that their individual actions fail to maintain infrastructure and processes that are essential for all of society. 10. Brain-to-brain Interfaces
It’s no Vulcan mind meld, but brain-to-
brain interfaces (BBI) have been achieved, allowing for direct communication from one brain to another without speech. The interactions can be between humans or between human and animals. The ethical issues are countless. What kind of neuro security can we put in place to protect individuals from having accidental information shared or removed from their brains (especially by hackers)? If two individuals share an idea, who is entitled to claim ownership? Who is responsible for the actions devoted by the recipient of a thought if a separate thinker is dictating the actions?