Woman in the colombian thought

of the 19th century

 PROBLEM STATEMENT
In what way does the female imaginary work within the poetic thought of the
poem ‘¡No Más Amor!’ in the work ‘Convulsiones’ by Luis Vargas Tejada?

hypothesis General Objectiv

The author Luis Vargas Tejada To establish the effect of

through the romantic poem neoclassical and romantic
‘¡No Más Amor! ’, from his work thinking within the female
‘Convulsiones’, gives voice to imaginary and its expression in
the woman silenced within its the poem ‘¡No Más Amor!’ by
neoclassical context. Luis Vargas Tejada.

2
 Specific objetives

1. To determine the 2. To identify the 3. To contrast the vision

influence of the woman’s imaginary of women in neoclassical
romantic and within the poem thinking with the one
neoclassical within ‘¡No Más Amor! ’. proposed in the poem
the work from a romantic
‘Convulsiones’ and perspective.
the poem ‘¡No Más
Amor!’.

3
 Theoretical framework

1. Neoclassic and romantic movement: Shimose, P. (2001). Literatura española: neoclásica y romántica.
Diccionario filosófico M.M. Rosental y P.F. Ludin. (2005). Colombia.

2. Poetry and Poetic speaker: Octavio Paz (1967). El Arco y la Lira. México. Juan Villegas Morales, (Julio de 1981).
Teoría del yo poético y poesía española.

3.Aesthetic of Reception: Wolfgang Iser, el proceso de lectura , un proceso fenomenológico

4.Female Imaginary: Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia (UNICEF). (2017). Comunicación, infancia y
adolescencia: Guías para periodistas: Perspectiva de Género. En Liliana. Hendel. Argentina. Medina Garrido, R.
M., & Dorado Lazo, A. (Marzo de 2017). Conociendo la historia del feminismo. La Pluma Violeta, Instituto
nacional de las mujeres. (2007). Glosario de Género. En Inmujeres. México

4
 Analogical Hermeneutics

Interpretation
Objetivity

Univocity Equivocity

5
 Sign or The Poem
Representamen

Object Interpretant The Female Perceptions

Imaginary in and personal
Neoclassicism and inferences
Romanticism

6
Methodology Aproach Logic Objetives Results

Type of Analitycal Explanatory Deductive 1. To determine the 1. The author uses the
research influence of the Romanticism and Neoclassicism
romantic and to expose the two reality of his
neoclassical within the context, the first one for
work ‘Convulsiones’ criticizing the society whit an
and the poem ‘¡No informative value, and the
Más Amor! ’ second one for exposing a
hidden reality with an emotional
3. To contrast the link.
vision of women in
neoclassical thinking 3. The woman portrayed in the
with that proposed in poem break with the thinking of
the poem from a inequality down between women
romantic perspective and men, which has its roots in
the Neoclassical thinking.
Method Analogic Interpretative Inductive 2. To identify the 2. It is possible to identify the
Hermeneutics woman’s imaginary female imaginary in a process of
within the poem ‘¡No transformation, and rebuilding
Más Amor! ’. her self-image according to her
perception

7
 conclusions

✣ The Neoclassicism and the Romanticism meet intertwined in Luis Vargas Tejada's work.
✣ It's possible to rebuild the history wrote by the author, and build a new one from the
things no implicit in his work, making a new vision of it.

✣ It is possible to make an intimate approximation towards the female imaginary, which

allows to see the feelings, thoughts, and history of the woman represented into the poem.

✣ There is a validation of the poetic speaker gave by Luis Vargas Tejada according to the
historical reality and the emotional consciousness through the work’s reader.

✣ The author does manage to tell us in a poetic way the reality of the women of its
time; showing himself as an ally of female emancipation.

8
Thank you!