Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
R R ,
N 2
1
( R)
2
N 1
i
i 1
N
1
where R
N
R
i 1
i is the sample mean of R
Understanding the component of risk and measuring It…
What happens when all outcomes are not equally
likely?
p R R ,
n 2
2
i i
i 1
n
where R p R
i 1
i i is the sample mean of R
68.26% of time, its return will lie within 5% (=12% - 7%) and 19%
(=12% + 7%)
95.44% of time, its return will lie within -2% (= 12% - 2 x 7%) and
26% (=12% + 2 x 7%)
99.74% of time, its return will lie within -9% (= 12% - 3 x 7%) and
33% (=12% + 3 x 7%)
What is the chance that its return would fall below 5%?
(100% - 68.26%) / 2 = 15.87%
Understanding Portfolio Return
Portfolio is a pool or collection of individual assets
Example; if you have put $400 in Asset-A and $600 in Asset-B, and I have
put $200 in Asset-A and $300 in Asset-B, we both are holding the same
portfolio of A, B, C: (40%, 60%, 0%)]
Portfolio return and risk are measured by its Expected Return and
Variance, as we have so far done for individual assets.
Portfolio return is
m
RP wi Ri
i 1
So, even a portfolio of small-firm stocks would not give you 17.4%
return every year; it would give “on the average” 17.4% over many
years
Expected Return +
CanNOT Get Rid Of
Systematic Portion +
Induced by Risk
Can Get Rid Of
Unsystematic Portion
By Diversification
If I hold only the shares of one computer company (Infy, TCS, or WIPPRO), I am
exposed to the risk that my company may lose market-share to the other
computer companies
If I hold shares of all industries in India, I am protected against this risk. But, I am
exposed to the risk that Indian economy may NOT do well.
If I hold shares across different countries, I am protected against this risk. But,
what if the Global Equity-Market does not do well?
Objective and types of risk drives the importance of each steps for the
execution of risk management strategies
Valuation of Assets
(Debt & Equity)
Valuation of Equity
Introduction
Valuation of an equity would depend on the required return the
investor would demand to invest in the equity.
What are the factors that determine the required rate of return on an
investment?
Risk associated with the investment. The greater the risk, greater
will be the required return.
The size of the cash flows received from it. Greater the cash flow
greater would be the valuation
The timing of the cash flows.
How do we define and measure risk of an investment and what do we
mean when we say that investment in asset A is riskier than the
investment in asset B?
What is the relationship between an asset’s risk and its required
return?
Risk associated with an asset can be of two types
Systematic risk: The risk contributed by the factors that affect all
the assets. For example decline in growth rate of the economy.
Unsystematic risk: The risk contributed by the factors that affect
only the asset under consideration. For example decline in growth
rate of the company where the investment has been made.
Equity Valuation: Role of Diversification
When an investor makes an investment he takes two kind of risk
One that is specific to the equity
Other that is related to the macro economic factor, which would affect all
equities
If two equities are co-related with each other by combining these two
equities one can reduce the risk associated with individual equities.
If we take a very large number of equities and the investors will
allocate the invest able fund across all these equities then the
portfolios will not have any equity specific risk (unsystematic risk)
The portfolio would only have systematic risk, and market would only
provide incremental return for taking the systematic risk.
This has an important implication
To a diversified investor only systematic risk matters
The investment decision would depend on individual assets contribution
to the systematic risk
Understanding Systematic Risk
There is a reward on an average for bearing incremental risk and the
reward depends only on the systematic risk of the investment
Why?
Unsystematic risk can be eliminated by diversification, hence no
reward for taking the risk. Market will not reward for taking
unnecessary risk.
Only systematic risk is relevant for determining the expected return
and the risk premium of an asset
Systematic risk is measured by the BETA of an asset - (Beta)
Beta measures the systematic risk of an asset relative to market
portfolio. By definition market portfolio has a beta of 1.0
So an asset with a beta of 0.50 has half as much systematic risk
as the market portfolio
An asset with a beta of 2.0 has twice as much systematic risk as
the market portfolio
The larger the beta, the higher the systematic risk and the greater
will be the expected return
Security A may have higher unsystematic risk than security B, if
security B has more systematic risk then the expected return on
security B would be higher than security A
Understanding the Portfolio Return and Risk
Portfolio return can be calculated by taking a weighted average of
expected return of all assets that constitute the portfolio.
Risk of an asset can be measured by calculating the standard
deviations of returns of the asset.
Calculation of portfolio risk is more complex because of interaction
among assets
The portfolio risk is measured by summing of all the co-variances
A well diversified portfolio has only systematic risk. Therefore we
can calculate the contribution of an individual asset to the portfolio
risk by measuring the co-variances between the asset and well
diversified portfolio (market portfolio)
The Beta which measure the systematic risk of an asset is nothing
but the co-variance between the asset and a market portfolio (well
diversified portfolio)
A security would enter a portfolio only when its contribution towards
portfolio return is higher in comparison to its contribution towards
portfolio risk
Risk Premium & CAPM
A risk averse investor demands risk premium if he is taking
incremental risk
If Ri is the return from an asset i and risk-free rate is Rf then the risk
premium of the asset I is Ri – Rf
Is the risk premium (Ri – Rf) adequate for the asset i
How would we know adequacy of risk premium of an asset?
First we need to calculate the risk premium market demand for a market
portfolio, which is (Rm – Rf) where Rm is the expected return from the market
Multiply (Rm – Rf) with the quantity of risk associate with the asset I, which is
measure by Beta
Once we know the risk premium of the asset i we can easily
calculate the expected return from the asset I
The expected return from asset i is described in the form CAPM
Deriving the CAPM
Let us take an asst i
Asset i’s contribution to risk premium is Ri – Rf
Asset i’s contribution to risk is Cov(Ri, Rm)
Risk premium per unit of risk is = (Ri – Rf)/ Cov(Ri, Rm)
Let us take the market portfolio m
The risk premium in the market is Rm – Rf
The risk of the market portfolio is Cov(Rm, Rm) = σm2
Risk premium per unit of risk is = (Rm – Rf)/ σm2
In the equilibrium the risk premium per unit of risk for the asset I will
be equal to the risk premium per unit of risk for the market portfolio
Therefore (Ri – Rf)/ Cov(Ri, Rm) = (Rm – Rf)/ σm2
(Ri – Rf) = (Rm – Rf) * [Cov(Ri, Rm)/ σm2]
Ri = Rf + Cov(Ri, Rm)/ σm2] * (Rm – Rf)
Ri = Rf + βi * (Rm – Rf) where β = Cov(Ri, Rm)/ σm2]
Now we have equation which would help us in calculating the
expected return for an asset
Using CAPM
The CAPM can be used for many purpose
Pricing of risky assets
If the expected return is higher then the asset is over priced
If the expected return is lower then the asset is under priced
As a investor one is always looking for under priced asset
Term to Maturity
It is the time remaining for the bond to mature and time remaining for
which interest has to be paid as promised.
The company is going to pay Rs.1000 at the end of 10th year. The present
value of the maturity amount would be
1000 / (1+0.08)10 = 1000 / 2.1589 = Rs.463.19
The two parts can be added to get the value of the bond
Rs.536.81 + Rs.463.19 = Rs.1000
The bond is selling at its face value. Given the coupon rate is 8% and coupon
amount is Rs.80, the bond will be valued at Rs.1000
Valuing Debt: Example of Change in Interest rate
Let us a year has gone by and the interest rate has changed to 10%;
Tata Motors bond has 9 years to maturity.
The maturity amount at the end of 9 year is Rs.1000
The coupon rate is 8%, and coupon amount is Rs. 80.
The coupon is paid at the end of the year
The company is going to pay 9 coupons which can be treated as annuity and the
present value of the annuity would be
(R80 / 0.1) * [1 - 1 / (1+0.1)9] = 800 * [1 – 1 / 2.3579] = 800 * 0.57590 = Rs.460.72
The company is going to pay Rs.1000 at the end of 9th year. The present value of the
maturity amount would be
1000 / (1+0.1)9 = 1000 / 2.3579 = Rs.424.10
The two parts can be added to get the value of the bond
Rs.460.72 + Rs.424.10 = Rs.884.82
The bond would sell at Rs.885 after one year when the interest rate is 10%
Given the going interest rate is 10%, the YTM has to be 10%. The investor would
only get YTM of 10% on 8% coupon rate bond only if the investor get the bond at
discount
Loss in interest rate of 2% will compensated by the difference in value at maturity
and market price
Rs.1000 – Rs. 884.82 = Rs.115.18 is nothing but the present value of difference in
coupon value at 8% and 10% coupon rate which is value of annuity of Rs.20 for 9
years discounted at 10%.
(R20 / 0.1) * [1 - 1 / (1+0.1)9] = 200 * [1 – 1 / 2.3579] = 200 * 0.57590 = Rs.115.18
Valuing Debt: Example of Change in Interest rate
Let us a year has gone by and the interest rate has changed to 6%;
Tata Motors bond has 9 years to maturity.
The maturity amount at the end of 9 year is Rs.1000
The coupon rate is 8%, and coupon amount is Rs. 80.
The coupon is paid at the end of the year
The company is going to pay 9 coupons which can be treated as annuity and the present
value of the annuity would be
(R80 / 0.06) * [1 - 1 / (1+0.06)9] = 1333.333 * [1 – 1 / 1.6895] = 1333.333 * 0.40810
= Rs.544.14
The company is going to pay Rs.1000 at the end of 9th year. The present value of the
maturity amount would be
1000 / (1+0.06)9 = 1000 / 1.6895 = Rs.591.89
The two parts can be added to get the value of the bond
Rs.544.14 + Rs.591.89 = Rs.1,136.03
The bond would sell at Rs.1,136 after one year when the interest rate is 6%
Given the going interest rate is 6%, the YTM has to be 6%. The investor would only
get YTM of 6% on 8% coupon rate bond only if the investor get the bond at premium
Gain in interest rate of 2% will compensated by the difference in value at maturity
and market price
Rs.1136.03 – Rs. 1000 = Rs.136.03 is nothing but the present value of difference in
coupon value at 8% and 6% coupon rate which is value of annuity of Rs.20 for 9
years discounted at 10%.
(R20 / 0.06) * [1 - 1 / (1+0.06)9] = 333.33 * [1 – 1 / 1.6895] = 333.33 * 0.40810 =
Rs.136.03
Valuing Debt: Generalizing
Based on the learning from the examples we can generalize the formula for
valuing the bond
V = [C/r] * [1 – 1/(1+r)t] + [F/(1+r)t, where
V is the price of the bond
C is the coupon amount
r is the yield required from the bond
F is the face value or the amount received at the maturity
t is the time term left to maturity
Inverse Floater
In the case of an inverse floater the coupon varies inversely with the
benchmark.
For instance the rate on an inverse floater may be specified as 10% -
LIBOR.
In this case as LIBOR rises, the coupon will decrease, whereas as LIBOR
falls, the coupon will increase.
In case of inverse floater a a floor has to be specified for the coupon
because if the in the absence of a floor the coupon can become
negative
Callable Bonds
In the case of callable bonds the issuer has the right to call back the
bond before the maturity of the bond by paying the face value.
When the yield is falling the issuer would be better of calling back the
bond if he has the option
On the other hand the buyer would like to hold on to the bond because
he is getting higher yield, and he has a re-investment risk
The call option always works in favor of the issuer
Freely callable bonds can be called at any time and hence offer the
lender no protection. On the other hand deferred callable bonds can
be called after some pre-specified time
In some cases some premium is paid (one years coupon) at the time
of calling the bond, which is called the call premium
Putt-able Bonds
In the case of putt-able bonds the subscriber has the right to return the
bond before the maturity and collect the face value.
When the yield is rising the subscriber would be better of surrendering the
bond if he has the option
On the other hand the issuer would like the lender to hold on to the bond
because the issuer would have to pay higher yield, and he has a re-
issuance risk
The put option always works in favor of the lender
Freely putt-able bonds can be returned at any time and hence offer
the issuer no protection. On the other hand deferred putt-able bonds
can be returned after some pre-specified time
In some cases some premium is paid (one years coupon) at the time
of returning the bond, which is called the put premium
Convertible and Exchangeable Bonds
A convertible bond is right for the bond holder to convert the bond into
common stocks of the issuing corporation.
The conversion ratio (# of common stock per bond) is
predetermined.
The conversion can be made after the a pre-specified time or over
a pre-specified period.
The stated conversion ratio may also decline over time depending
on the provision
The conversion ratio generally adjusted proportionately for stock
splits and stock dividends.
Exchangeable bonds are a category of convertible bond, that grants
the holder a privilege to gets the shares of a different company.
Exchangeable bonds may be issued by firms which own blocks of
shares of another company and intend to sell them eventually by
doing in a exchangeable bond way is to defer the selling decision
because
The expectation that the price of the exchangeable stock will
rise
Tax benefit involved
Cost of Capital
Understanding Cost of Capital
Firms need capital for creating assets that would generate return for
the owners of firm
The capital is provided by organizations that have surplus capital
Capital can have two types of claim
Debt
Equity
The SBU demand a return to provide capital
The expected return demanded by the SBU is the cost of capital for the
firm, the DBU
The expected return would be a function of types of capital
The firm’s overall cost of capital will reflect the required return on the
firms composition of types of capital
Overall cost of capital will be a mixture of the returns required by the
creditors (debt capital provider) and the returns required by the
shareholders (equity capital provider)
The cost of capital is related to the expected return required by the
provider of both of capital
A firm’s cost of capital is nothing but the weighted average cost of debt
and equity
Required Return vis-à-vis Cost of Capital
What is required rate of return?
Required rate of return is the rate of return above which the investor
would be better of
For example
If the required rate of return on a investment is 10%, the investor would be
better of if the return is more than 10%
On the other hand the investor would not invest if the rate of return is below
10%
In this specific example the cost of capital for the investment would be 10%
The required return would be a function of the risk associated with the
project
Let us evaluate a risk-free project
How would we determine the required rate of return for the risk-free project?
Required return for a risk free project is nothing but the return an investor gets
when the investor invest in risk free instrument, which is nothing but return
available on government bonds
Let us evaluate a risky project
Required return would be higher for a risky project and will depend on the risk-
free rate and the risk premium demanded by the investor
The cost of capital associated with an investment depends on the risk of the
investment
Cost of capital primarily depends on the use of funds
Understanding Cost of Equity
Cost of equity of firm is the expected return form the
firm’s equity
How would we know the firm’s cost of equity?
This is a difficult question
Why?
There is no way of directly measuring the expected return of the
investor in the firm’s equity.
Therefore the cost of equity of firm need to be estimated.
We will discuss four approaches for estimating the cost
of equity
The dividend growth model approach
The security market line (SML) approach
Bond yield plus risk premium approach
Earning-Price ratio approach
The Dividend Growth Model Approach
Let us assume that;
A firm is currently paying D0 dividend
The dividend is expected to grow at a constant rate g
The required return on equity is RE
From our valuation of equity classed we know that:
P0 = D0x(1+g) / RE – g = D1 / RE – g
By rearranging we will get RE = [D1 / P0] + g
Given that RE is the required rate of return on firm’s equity, it would be
the cost of equity capital for the firm
To estimate the RE we need to know P0, D1, and g
It would be easy to get P0 and D1 for listed firm, but estimating the g
would a challenge
Pros & Cons of the Dividend Growth Model
Approach
It is a simple model
There are some practical difficulties we would face when
we are calculating the cost of equity for firms
Who does not pay any dividends
Even if companies pay dividends there is no guaranty that it would
grow at a constant rate
Importantly the estimated cost of equity is very sensitive to the
estimated growth rate
Conceptually this approach excludes risk associated with
the firms business
Investors expected return would increase if the risky-ness of
investment increases
However, there is no direct adjustment for the risky-ness of an
investment in this model
There is no allowance for the degree of uncertainty associate with
the estimated growth rate of the dividend payout
The SML Approach
From our valuation of equity classed we know that
Ri = Rf + βi * (Rm – Rf)
Where;
Ri is the expected return from the firm i (which is nothing but the cost
of equity for firm i)
Rf is the risk free rate of return
βi is mthe risk associate with the firm I
Rm is the market return from equity investment
To use the SML approach for estimating the cost of equity we would
require
The available risk-free rate, which can be easily found by
considering 1 year return from investment in government security
Estimate for the market return, which can be calculated by
considering the return from the investment in the equity index fund
(in case of India it can be return from NIFFTY or SENSEX)
Estimate of the risk associated with the company, which can be
estimated from the historical data of the firms equity
Pros & Cons of the SML Approach
What are the advantages?
The SML approach has two distinctive advantages
It explicitly quantifies risk associate with the investment
It can be estimated for the firms that do not pay any dividends
What are the disadvantages?
The SML approach has two distinctive disadvantages
It is quite difficult to estimate the risk associate with the firm and the
market return
We would be using few estimates to estimate cost of equity.
Therefore if our estimates are poor then the cost of equity will be
inaccurate
The dividend growth as well as the SML approach uses
the past data to predict the future
Economic conditions can change quickly and the past may not be
the best guide to the future
The cost of equity can be sensitive to change is economic
conditions
Bond Yield Plus Risk Premium & Earning-Price
Ratio Approach
Bond Yield Plus Risk Premium Approach
In case of this approach
The cost of equity = Yield on long term yield bonds + Risk-premium
The logic of this approach is simple
The firm which is risky will have higher cost of equity
The cost of equity is linked to cost of debt
However, this approach is silence on how one should calculate the
risk premium, the calculation is subjective approach by analysts
Let us assume that the riskless rate is 8%, and the market risk
premium is 10%. If the firm is an all-equity firm with a beta of 1.2
The cost of equity = WACC = 21.6%
If the firm has to evaluate new projects using this cost of capital, it would
accept project that would provide return in excess of 21.6%.
If the risk of the new project is lower then the risk premium required
for the same project would be lower than 10%, hence the cost of
capital would be less than 21.6%.
Use of same cost of capital could reject project that are relatively safe
Therefore, if the new project risk is different from the risk of the existing
business then using the same cost of capital to would result in sub-
optimal investment decision
Divisional and Project Costs of Capital
The same type of error can arise if a company has multiple lines of business.
Assume a corporation has two business divisions
A grocery retail business
An electronics manufacturing operation
The first has relatively low risk
The second has relatively high risk
The corporation’s cost of capital is a mixture of the costs of capitals of two distinct
business
It is natural to say that both of these divisions would be competing for capital
The retail business wants to expand to new cities
Manufacturing unit wants to set up a new plant
What happen if we use WACC as a tool to allocate capital?
The manufacturing division would get more capital
The cost of capital is same for both the division
It would provide more return in comparison to retail business because
the business has more risk
The less risky retail division may have great profit potential, but it would not get
capital for expansion
Therefore WACC may not be suitable criterion for evaluating project with different
levels of risk.
Ideally the cost of capital needs to estimated for not only for new projects but also for
the different divisions with in an existing business conglomerate
This can be done by following the same method we have discussed before with
minor modifications
Illustration - 21
A company has 2MM shares outstanding
The stock price is Rs.40
The debt is quoted at 90% of face value and the face value of debt is
10 MM
The YTM for the debt is 10%
The risk-free rate is 5%
The market risk premium is 10% and the beta is .75
The tax rate is 30%
RE = 5 + .75 x 10 = 12.5% and RD = 10%
The value of equity is 2 x 40 = 40MM
Value of debt is 0.90 x 10 = 9MM
Total value V = 49MM
WACC = 40/49 x 12.5 + 9/49 * 10 x (1-0.3) = 11.49%
Thank You