• Graduated from the University of Chicago in one year • Attended Yale and earned a PhD in Psychology • Became fascinated by moral development in children • Theorized six stages of human moral development Kholbergs theory of moral development
• Studying the development of moral reasoning
• Based his theory on the findings of Piaget in studying cognitive development • Focuses on the reason behind every action • Took 5 years to published his view about moral development • Known of his HEINZ DILEMMA Levels of Moral Reasoning • Preconventional- Moral reasoning is based on the consequences/result of the act, not on the whether the act itself is good or bad. • Conventional- Moral reasoning is based on the convention or norms of society. This may include approval of others, law and other. • Post-conventional- Moral reasoning is based on enduring or consistent principles. It not just recognizing the law, but the principles behind the Preconventional Level STAGE 1 Punishment/Obedience One is motivated by fear of punishment. He will act in order to avoid punishment. STAGE 2 Mutual Benefit One is motivated to act by the benefit that one may obtain later. You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. Conventional Level STAGE 3 Social Approval One is motivated by what others expect in behavior- good boy, good girl. The person acts because he/she values how he/she will appear to others. He/she gives importance on what people will think or say. STAGE 4 Law and Order One is motivated to act in order to uphold law and order. The person will follow the law because it is law. Post-conventional STAGE 5 Social Contract Law that are wrong can be changed. One will act based on social justice and the common good. STAGE 6 Universal Principles This is associated with the development of one’s conscience. Having a set of standards that drives one to possess moral responsibility to make societal changes regardless of consequences to oneself. Examples of persons are Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King Jr. Problems with Kohlberg's Methods
• The dilemmas are artificial (i.e., they lack
ecological validity) • The sample is biased • The dilemmas are hypothetical(i.e., they are not real) • Poor research design