Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Slope =
Nonlinear Resistors
• Silicon Carbide based
• Sic 80%
• Clay
• Feldspar
• MnO2
• CuO
• (Sodium Silicate ?)
• 0.3 to 0.45
9. ‘Most Modern‘ Surge Arrester
Sb 2 O 3
V= KI
Bi 2 O 3 SiC NLRs …. 0.25 to 0.4
CO 2 O 3 balance n = 1/ 4 to 0.25
Zr2 O 3
MOV NLRs … 1/40 – 1/50
Al 2 O 3 ....
1
V2 I 2 I 2 V2
V1 I1 I1 V1
V I
If 2 2, 2 2 4 to 2 2.5
V1 I1
n = 1/ = 40 to 50 for SiC NLRs
2 40 to 250
for MOV
S u rg e A rre s te r
S e r ie s G a p s N o n L in e a r R e s is t o r s
Yes
Increase Number of Is Energy Greater
Columns Than Arrester
Capability?
No
New Solution No
Required?
Tabulate Arrester Protective Levels
Yes
Determine Minimum Insulation Withstand
Requirements
Tabulate Results
FINAL HVDC insulation coordination design
The objectives of the final insulation coordination process can be summarized as
follows:
• Verification of the adequacy of the design.
• Elimination of excessive conservatism.
• Optimization of the design considering the cost of arresters.
• Determination of data for final arrester and equipment insulation specification
The steps involved in the methodology as shown in the flow chart are as follows:
• Step 1: Verify maximum continuous operating voltages (MCOV)
• Step 2: Validate or re-establish limiting cases and limiting case data.
• Step 3: Determine minimum insulation requiremtns.
• Step 4: Adjust BIL levels as required.
• Step 5: Where feasible, optimize the selection of protective devices (arresters) and
insulation withstand requirements by considering the cost of insulation versus the
cost of protection.
Flow Chart of Final insulation coordination process
Yes
Change Adjust V10
Required?
No
Adjust Protective
Level Adjust BIL Level as Required
No
Yes
Optimization Stop
Feasible?
End