0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
19 Ansichten19 Seiten
1) The document discusses a passage from 1 Corinthians about a man having a sexual relationship with his father's wife. This was seen as a problem even by pagan standards of the time.
2) Scholars debated the details but agreed the man should be expelled from the fellowship and association with the church to protect others from his influence.
3) One scholar notes the passage is rarely applied today and expelling someone could be seen as unloving, though it was intended to protect the church community.
Originalbeschreibung:
Problems in the society discussed in the 1st Corinthians Chapter 5-6
1) The document discusses a passage from 1 Corinthians about a man having a sexual relationship with his father's wife. This was seen as a problem even by pagan standards of the time.
2) Scholars debated the details but agreed the man should be expelled from the fellowship and association with the church to protect others from his influence.
3) One scholar notes the passage is rarely applied today and expelling someone could be seen as unloving, though it was intended to protect the church community.
1) The document discusses a passage from 1 Corinthians about a man having a sexual relationship with his father's wife. This was seen as a problem even by pagan standards of the time.
2) Scholars debated the details but agreed the man should be expelled from the fellowship and association with the church to protect others from his influence.
3) One scholar notes the passage is rarely applied today and expelling someone could be seen as unloving, though it was intended to protect the church community.
Deguit, Uenice Adreana Gadingan, Danica Magsayo, Jay Rald Moreno, Kristel Kay Suasin, Angelyn PROBLEM SEXUAL IMMORALITY Chapter 5:1-2
“It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality
among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father’s wife. And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have been filled with grief and have put out of your fellowship the man who did this?” ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM SEXUAL IMMORAL • The term sexually immoral is the ancient Greek word porneia. • Originally, porneia just referred to going to prostitutes; but before New Testament times, the Jewish community used the word to refer to any kind of extramarital sex, including homosexuality. This is its sense in the New Testament (Guzik, 2015). • Porneia so often appears first in New Testament "sin lists" but not because the first Christians had a lot of "hang ups" about sex. Instead, it is because the area of sex was one of the most dramatic places where the ethics of Greek culture clashed with the ethics of Jesus. Sexual immorality was an accepted fact of life for the common person in Greek culture, but it was not to be so among the followers of Jesus (Guzik, 2015). • That a man has his father's wife: Apparently, someone was having an on-going sexual relationship (either as married or living together) with his stepmother (his father's wife). The woman involved must not be a Christian, for she isn't even addressed. • c. And such sexual immorality as is not even named among the Gentiles: Paul understood that this kind of incestuous relationship would be considered taboo even among the pagans of their culture, yet the Corinthian Christians seem accepting of this behavior. A SCHOLAR’S OPINION • According to Dr. Peter Orr it is very obvious that the Corinthian church was tolerating a case of blatant sexual immorality in their midst. Not only should a church not overlook any kind of sexual immorality, this type of immorality was even frowned upon by the surrounding culture: a man was sleeping with his father’s wife • Scholars debate many of the details of this passage, but the basic idea is clear: they were to exclude this man from their fellowship (5:2; 13) meaning the congregation were not to associate with him or even to eat with him (5:11). In spiritual terms, this exclusion would involve the man being ‘handed over to Satan’ for the ‘destruction of his flesh’ so that his spirit might be saved on the day of the Lord (5:5). This action would ensure that the church ‘cleansed’ itself from ‘old leaven’ (5:7) that was in danger of infecting the entire fellowship (5:6). Just as Paul had already passed judgment on this man (5:3), the Corinthians were to judge him and others like him (5:12) by expelling them from their midst (5:13). LAPSES OF THIS PASSAGE
• According to Dr. Peter Orr the application of this
passage in 21st Century churches remains rare. What Paul envisages appears to be unloving and ineffective. • Also There is no suggestion in this passage that the action will definitely lead to this person’s ultimate salvation. However, what is definitely effective is the protection of the rest of the church from this person’s influence RONALD CHARLES
• Paul cannot accept the laxity of the community in
dealing with the issue at hand. In fact, he focuses his rebuke on the community rather than on the one who has committed what Paul considers to be an odious act. CHAPTER 5:9-11 “I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people - not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, and idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat.” SCHOLAR’S OPINION TEN LIES ABOUT GOD: AND HOW YOU MIGHT ALREADY BE DECEIVED BY ERWIN LUTZER • According to this book. That passage from Corinthians 5:9 is rather irrational. SOURCES
• Guzik, David (2015, December 22). Enduring Word: 1 Corinthians 5 –
Confronting Immorality in the Church. • Lutzer, Erwin. Ten Lies About God: And How You Might Already Be Deceived. • Orr, Dr. Peter (2000 July). THANK YOU!