Soil Compaction: Principles of Geotechnical Engineering Eighth Edition

Principles of Geotechnical Engineering
Eighth Edition
Chapter 6
Soil Compaction
1 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, Eighth Edition Das/Sobhan
Student Objectives and Outline
 6.2 – Learn about compaction

 6.3 – Learn about the standard Proctor test to obtain the
maximum dry unit weight
 6.4 – Understand what factors affect the degree of
compaction achieved by a soil
 6.5 – Learn about the modified Proctor test and why it
represents field conditions better than the standard test

Student Objectives and Outline (cont.)
 6.6 – Learn about some correlations involving compaction

 6.7 – Understand the structure of compacted clay soil
 6.8 – Know how compaction affects cohesive soil
properties
 6.9 – Learn about compaction in the field
 6.10 – Understand specifications for field compaction and
the ways that contractors try to meet them economically

Student Objectives and Outline (cont.)
 6.11 – Learn about the sand cone, rubber balloon, and

nuclear methods of determining unit weight of compaction
 6.12 – Learn about compaction of organic materials
 6.13 – Understand that some soils have better
compaction characteristics than others
 6.14 – Learn about some special methods of compaction

6.2 Compaction-General Principles
 Compaction is the densification of soil by removal of air

 Compaction:
 Increases the strength of soils
 Decreases the amount of settlement of structures
 Increases the stability of the slopes of embankments
 Vibration and rollers may be used to compact soil

Compaction-General Principles (cont.)
 Compaction may be measured in terms of dry unit weight

 Water acts as a softening agent during compaction
 The dry unit weight at 𝑤 = 𝑤1 is:
𝛾𝑑 𝑤=𝑤1 = 𝛾𝑑 𝑤=0 + Δ𝛾𝑑
 The dry unit weight increases initially as water is added

Compaction-General Principles (cont.)
 After a certain point

(𝑤 = 𝑤2 ), the dry unit
weight decreases as the
moisture content increases
 The moisture content at
maximum dry weight is the
optimum moisture content

6.3 Standard Proctor Test
 In the Proctor test, soil is

mixed with varying
amounts of water
 The soil is then compacted
within a mold by 25 blows
with a standard sized
hammer

Standard Proctor Test (cont.)
 The dry unit weight may be

calculated as follows:
𝛾
𝛾𝑑 =
𝑤 %
1+
100
 The dry unit weight may
then be plotted against the
moisture content

Standard Proctor Test (cont.)
 The theoretical maximum dry unit weight is given by:

𝛾𝑤
𝛾𝑧𝑎𝑣 =
1
𝑤+
𝐺𝑠
 𝛾𝑧𝑎𝑣 is the zero-air-void unit weight (which should be the
maximum dry unit weight), and 𝐺𝑠 is the specific gravity
of soil solids

6.4 Factors Affecting Compaction
 The soil type affects the

maximum dry unit weight
and optimum moisture
content
 Some soils, like sand,
exhibit compaction curves
other than a single-peaked
bell shape

Factors Affecting Compaction (cont.)

Factors Affecting Compaction (cont.)
 As the compaction effort

increases, the maximum
dry unit weight increases
 Additionally, the optimum
moisture content is
decreased
 Degree of compaction is
not directly proportional to
compaction effort

6.5 Modified Proctor Test
 The modified Proctor test is designed to better represent

field conditions, and uses a heavier hammer with a larger
drop, but the same mold
 This increases the compaction effort, which in turn
increases the measured maximum dry unit weight

6.6 Empirical Relationships
 Gurtug and Sridharan proposed the following correlations

based on the plastic limit of cohesive soils:
𝑤𝑜𝑝𝑡 % = 1.95 − 0.38 log 𝐸 𝑃𝐿
𝛾𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑘𝑁Τ𝑚3 = 22.68𝑒 −0.0183𝑤𝑜𝑝𝑡 (%)
 𝑃𝐿 is the plastic limit (in %), and 𝐸 is the compaction
energy (2700 𝑘𝑁/𝑚3 for the modified Proctor test)
 Similar relationships exist in terms of the plasticity index
and the liquid limit

6.7 Structure of Compacted Clay Soil
 At a given moisture
content, increased
compactive effort gives the
particles a more parallel
orientation

6.8 Effect of Compaction on

Cohesive Soil Properties
 Compaction changes the

structure of cohesive soils
 Hydraulic conductivity
measures how easily water
flows through the soil
 It is higher on the dry side
of the optimum moisture
content, due to large pores

Effect of Compaction on Cohesive Soil

Properties (cont.)
 At low pressures, soil is

more compressible when
compacted on the wet side
of the optimum moisture
 At higher pressures, the
same soil will be more
compressible if compacted
on the dry side instead

Effect of Compaction on Cohesive Soil

Properties (cont.)
 Some clays expand with

addition of moisture and
shrink when drying
 This can cause stresses on
the foundations of
structures

6.9 Field Compaction
 Most field compaction is done with rollers, including:

 Smooth-wheel rollers
 Pneumatic rubber-tired rollers
 Sheepsfoot rollers
 Vibratory rollers
 Handheld vibrating plates may be used for compaction
over a small area

Smooth-wheeled rollers
 Smooth-wheeled rollers are

useful for proof rolling
subgrades and finishing
operation of fills with sandy
and clayey soils
 Contact pressures can be
up to 310-380 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2

Pneumatic rubber-tired rollers
 Pneumatic rollers are also

useful for compacting
sandy and clayey soils
 Contact pressures range
from 600-700 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2

Sheepsfoot rollers
 Sheepsfoot rollers have

small projections, which
make them more effective
at compacting clayey soils
 Contact pressures range
from 1400-7000 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2

Vibratory rollers
 Vibratory rollers help

compact granular soils
 Vibrators may be attached
to other types of rollers
 Weights are rotated off-
center to produce vibration

Field Compaction
 Soil is spread in layers

 Water is sprayed on each
layer, which is then
compacted by a roller
 The amount of moisture
and the number of roller
passes affects the final dry
unit weight

6.10 Specifications for Field Compaction
 The relative compaction, 𝑅, is defined as:

𝛾𝑑 𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑
𝑅 % = × 100
𝛾𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥−𝑙𝑎𝑏
 In terms of the relative density, 𝐷𝑟 :
𝑅0
𝑅=
1 − 𝐷𝑟 1 − 𝑅0
 Where:
𝛾𝑑 𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑅0 =
𝛾𝑑 𝑚𝑎𝑥

Specifications for Field Compaction (cont.)
 In order to achieve the

desired dry unit weight, the
moisture content must fall
between 𝑤1 and 𝑤2
 There is a moisture
content, 𝑤3 , that will allow
the desired dry unit weight
with minimum effort

6.11 Determination of Field Unit Weight of

Compaction
 The field unit weight of compaction may be measured by:

 The sand cone method
 The rubber balloon method
 The nuclear method

The Sand Cone Method
 A small hole is excavated

in the compacted area
 The hole is filled with sand
using the jar to determine
the volume of the hole
 The dry unit weight then
calculated

The Rubber Balloon Method
 This procedure is similar to

the sand cone method
 However, the volume is
measured using a rubber
balloon filled with water
from a calibrated vessel

The Nuclear Method
 Nuclear density meters use

radioactive isotope sources
 Dense soil absorbs more
gamma radiation than
loose soil
 The meters operate either
in drilled holes or from the
soil surface

6.12 Compaction of Organic Soil and

Waste Materials
 The presence of organic

materials in a soil reduces
its strength
 The maximum dry unit
weight of compaction
decreases with increasing
organic content

Compaction of Organic Soil and

Waste Materials (cont.)
 The optimum moisture

content increases with an
increase in organic content
 Soils with more than about
10% organic material are
undesirable for compaction

6.13 Evaluation of Soils as

Compaction Material

6.14 Special Compaction Techniques
 Special compaction techniques are used for deep

compaction of in-place soils
 These include:
 Vibroflotation
 Dynamic compaction
 Blasting

Vibroflotation
 The Vibroflot unit contains

an eccentric weight and
vibrates horizontally
 It has openings at the top
and bottom for water jets
 The unit compacts a
cylinder of about 2m radius
each time it is lowered

Dynamic Compaction
 In dynamic compaction, a
heavy weight (80 to 360
kN) is dropped repeatedly
on the soil from a height of
7.5 to 30.5 m

Blasting
 Blasting involves detonating explosive charges at a depth

below the surface in saturated soil
 Three to five detonations are usually necessary
 Compaction over an area up to 18 m may be achieved
 The charges are usually placed at a depth of two-thirds
the thickness of the soil layer to be compacted

Summary
 The Proctor test is used to determine the maximum dry

unit weight of compaction and optimum moisture content
 The energy of compaction of the test affects these values
 Empirical relationships exist to estimate the maximum dry
unit weight and optimum moisture content of a soil
 Smooth-wheel, sheepsfoot, and vibratory rollers are
generally used for field compaction, while vibroflotation,
dynamic compaction, and blasting are special techniques

Soil Compaction: Principles of Geotechnical Engineering Eighth Edition

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Soil Compaction: Principles of Geotechnical Engineering Eighth Edition

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Principles of Geotechnical Engineering

1 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Student Objectives and Outline

 6.2 – Learn about compaction

2 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Student Objectives and Outline (cont.)

 6.6 – Learn about some correlations involving compaction

3 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Student Objectives and Outline (cont.)

 6.11 – Learn about the sand cone, rubber balloon, and

4 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

6.2 Compaction-General Principles

 Compaction is the densification of soil by removal of air

5 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Compaction-General Principles (cont.)

 Compaction may be measured in terms of dry unit weight

6 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Compaction-General Principles (cont.)

 After a certain point

7 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

6.3 Standard Proctor Test

 In the Proctor test, soil is

8 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Standard Proctor Test (cont.)

 The dry unit weight may be

9 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Standard Proctor Test (cont.)

 The theoretical maximum dry unit weight is given by:

10 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

6.4 Factors Affecting Compaction

 The soil type affects the

11 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Factors Affecting Compaction (cont.)

12 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Factors Affecting Compaction (cont.)

 As the compaction effort

13 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

6.5 Modified Proctor Test

 The modified Proctor test is designed to better represent

14 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

6.6 Empirical Relationships

 Gurtug and Sridharan proposed the following correlations

15 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

6.7 Structure of Compacted Clay Soil

16 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

6.8 Effect of Compaction on

 Compaction changes the

17 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Effect of Compaction on Cohesive Soil

 At low pressures, soil is

18 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Effect of Compaction on Cohesive Soil

 Some clays expand with

19 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

6.9 Field Compaction

 Most field compaction is done with rollers, including:

20 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

 Smooth-wheeled rollers are

21 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

Pneumatic rubber-tired rollers

 Pneumatic rollers are also

22 © 2014 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

 Sheepsfoot rollers have