Dr. K.GANESAN ASSITANT PROFESSOR(SR) VITSOL INTRODUCTION
• In ancient communities the guilty intention
was not a necessary element of crime. • So there was no Law of crimes, it is only about wrongs. • Further there was no such classification of wrongs as torts and crime. ANCIENT HINDU CRIMINAL LAW • This above view of ancient penal Law, though true in case of all systems of the world, but it is not correct in case of ancient Hindu Criminal Law. • In the Hindu Law importance is given for punishments of crimes rather compensation for wrongs. • But in certain circumstances wrong-doer had to compensate the victim. • In western criminal jurisprudence the right to punish the offender lay in the hands of individual. • This right was transferred only during middle ages from individual to the society and later to the state. • But in ancient Hindu Law it was the duty of the king to punish the offender. MOHAMMEDAN CRIMINAL LAW Mohammedan criminal law came in to existence after the conquest of muslim. This law was based on Quron and Hadis. It was developed through Jima and Kiyas. Crimes were classified into two classes:- 1. Crimes against God. ( Ex-drunkenness) 2. Crimes against man. (Ex-murder) • The offences against God were considered as public wrongs and could therefore, be punished by community or society. • The offences against man were private wrongs and therefore could be punished by individuals. • This is because in most of the cases crime was a wrong done to the individual and not to the state. So prosecution lay in the hands of the individual. • The rules of evidence were also defective and against the rules of natural justice. ENGLISH CRIMINAL LAW • When East India Company took over the administration of Indian Dominion, at that time Mohammedan Criminal law was in force. • In the beginning they adopted the policy of maintaining status quo. • Then efforts were made to remove defects. • The first attempt was by Warren Hastings to eradicate punishment of mutilation for dacoity. • Some important criminal reforms were made by Lord Cornwalis by making murder has a public wrong. • Efforts were made to rationalize the punishment by making it proportionate with the crime . • But the changes introduced in mohammedan criminal law were not uniformly applicable to all presidencies. • Later on it was realized that no satisfactory improvement was possible by piece meal legislation and a penal code was thought necessary. • The 1st Law Commission was appointed in 1834 with Lord Macauley as its chairman. • Sarvshri Macleod, Anderson and Millet were the other members of the Commission. • The commission prepared a draft Penal Code of India which was submitted to the Governor General of India in Council on 14-10- 1837. • It was presented to the Legislative Council in 1856. • The Bill was passed on 06-10-1860 and received the accent of the Governor General on the same date and thus become the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and came in to operation on 01-01-1862