0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
26 Ansichten11 Seiten
The document discusses common issues with research design, including lack of specificity in describing investigative aspects, poorly defined research problems, lack of theoretical frameworks, failure to establish significance, weak connections between past research and the current study, provincialism restricting meaningful outcomes, unclear objectives/hypotheses, poor methodological approaches, proximity sampling based on convenience rather than purpose, and failure to clearly describe techniques/instruments used to gather reliable data. Researchers should design studies addressing these common shortcomings by providing clear, concise descriptions of all aspects of the investigation.
The document discusses common issues with research design, including lack of specificity in describing investigative aspects, poorly defined research problems, lack of theoretical frameworks, failure to establish significance, weak connections between past research and the current study, provincialism restricting meaningful outcomes, unclear objectives/hypotheses, poor methodological approaches, proximity sampling based on convenience rather than purpose, and failure to clearly describe techniques/instruments used to gather reliable data. Researchers should design studies addressing these common shortcomings by providing clear, concise descriptions of all aspects of the investigation.
The document discusses common issues with research design, including lack of specificity in describing investigative aspects, poorly defined research problems, lack of theoretical frameworks, failure to establish significance, weak connections between past research and the current study, provincialism restricting meaningful outcomes, unclear objectives/hypotheses, poor methodological approaches, proximity sampling based on convenience rather than purpose, and failure to clearly describe techniques/instruments used to gather reliable data. Researchers should design studies addressing these common shortcomings by providing clear, concise descriptions of all aspects of the investigation.
Lack of Specificity -- do not describe the investigative
aspects of your study in overly-broad generalities. Avoid using vague qualifiers, such as, extremely, very, entirely, completely, etc. It's important that you design a study that describes the process of investigation in clear and concise terms. Otherwise, the reader cannot be certain what you intend to do. Poorly Defined Research Problem • the starting point of most new research in the social sciences is to formulate a problem statement and begin the process of developing questions that address the problem. Your paper should outline and explicitly delimit the problem and state what you intend to investigate since it will determine what research design you will use [identifying the research problem always precedes choice of design. Lack of Theoretical Framework • the theoretical framework represents the conceptual foundation of your study. Therefore, your research design should include an explicit set of logically derived hypotheses, basic postulates, or assumptions that can be tested in relation to the research problem. More information about developing a theoretical framework can be found here. Significance • the research design must include a clear answer to the "So What?" question. Be sure you clearly articulate why your study is important and how it contributes to the larger body of literature about the topic being investigated. Relationship between Past Research and Your Study • do not simply offer a summary description of prior research. Your literature review should include an explicit statement linking the results of prior research to the research you are about to undertake. This can be done, for example, by identifying basic weaknesses in previous studies and how your study helps to fill this gap in knowledge. Contribution to the Field In placing your study within the context of prior research, don't just note that a gap exists; be clear in describing how your study contributes to, or possibly challenges, existing assumptions or findings. Provincialism • this refers to designing a narrowly applied scope, geographical area, sampling, or method of analysis that restricts your ability to create meaningful outcomes and, by extension, obtaining results that are relevant and possibly transferable to understanding phenomena in other settings Objectives, Hypotheses, or Questions • your research design should include one or more questions or hypotheses that you are attempting to answer about the research problem underpinning your study. They should be clearly articulated and closely tied to the overall aims of your paper. Although there is no rule regarding the number of questions or hypotheses associated with a research problem, most studies in the social sciences address between one and five key questions. Poor Methodological Approach
• the design must include a well-developed and
transparent plan for how you intend to collect or generate data and how it will be analyzed. Ensure that the method used to gather information for analysis is aligned with the topic of inquiry and the underlying research questions to be addressed. Proximity Sampling • this refers to using a sample which is based not upon the purposes of your study, but rather, is based upon the proximity of a particular group of subjects. The units of analysis, whether they be persons, places, events, or things, must not be based solely on ease of access and convenience Techniques or Instruments • be clear in describing the techniques [e.g., semi- structured interviews] or instruments [e.g., questionnaire] used to gather data. Your research design should note how the technique or instrument will provide reasonably reliable data to answer the questions associated with the research problem.
International Studies Perspectives Volume 2 Issue 2 2001 (Doi 10.1111/1528-3577.00047) John S. Odell - Case Study Methods in International Political Economy PDF