Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CASE DIGEST
Antonio v. Reyes G.R. No.
155800 March 10, 2006
Petitioner and respondent met in August 1989
when petitioner was 26 years old and respondent
was 36 years of age.
Barely a
year after
their first
meeting,
they got
married.
In 1993, Leo filed to annul the marriage due to Marie’s
Psychological Incapacity.
Leo claimed that Marie persistently lied about herself, the people around her,
her occupation, income, educational attainment and other events or things. She
would claim that she is a psychologist but she is not. She would claim she is a
singer with the company Blackgold and that she is the latter’s number 1 money
maker but she’s not. She’d also spend lavishly as opposed to her monthly
income. She fabricates things and people only to serve her make believe world.
Leo presented an expert that proved Marie’s psychological incapacity.
Marie denied all Leo’s allegations and also
presented an expert to prove her case.
The RTC ruled against Marie and annulled the marriage.
The Matrimonial Tribunal of the church also annulled the
marriage and was affirmed by the Vatican’s Roman Rata.
The Court of Appeals reversed
the decision, hence the appeal.
Issue
Whether Antonio can impose
Article 36 of the Family Code as
basis for declaring their marriage
null and void.
Ruling
Psychological incapacity pertains to the inability to
understand the obligations of marriage as opposed
to a mere inability to comply with them. The
petitioner, aside from his own testimony presented
a psychiatrist and clinical psychologist who attested
that constant lying and extreme jealousy of Reyes
is abnormal and pathological and corroborated his
allegations on his wife’s behavior, which amounts
to psychological incapacity.
• The factual findings of the trial court are deemed
binding on the SC, owing to the great weight accorded
to the opinion of the primary trier of facts. As such, it
must be considered that respondent had consistently
lied about many material aspects as to her character
and personality. Her fantastic ability to invent and
fabricate stories and personalities enabled her to live
in a world of make-believe. This made her
psychologically incapacitated as it rendered her
incapable of giving meaning and significance to her
marriage.
The root causes of Reyes’ psychological incapacity
have been medically or clinically identified that was
sufficiently proven by experts. The gravity of
respondent’s psychological incapacity was considered
so grave that a restrictive clause was appended to the
sentence of nullity prohibited by the National Appellate
Matrimonial Tribunal from contracting marriage
without their consent. It would be difficult for an
inveterate pathological liar to commit the basic tenets
of relationship between spouses based on love, trust
and respect. Furthermore, Reyes’ case is incurable
considering that petitioner tried to reconcile with her
but her behavior remain unchanged.
Hence, the court conclude that
petitioner has established his cause
of action for declaration of nullity
under Article 36 of the Family
Code. Petition is GRANTED
Questions: