DESIGN A PREDICTIVE DIAGNOSIS

SYSTEM FOR SEISURE AND

SCHIZOPHRENIA
USING EEG SIGNALS

Ramjan Ali
180302018
 Introduction
The goal of the predictive system is to help in
diagnosis of the patients who are suffering
from Neurological disorder by analyzing EEG
signals using machine learning algorithms and
try to improve the efficiency and accuracy.
 Electroencephalogram(EEG)
• Brain which is the most complex of all the
other organs of our body is made up of about
100 billion neurons. These neurons generates
electrical potentials called the EEG signals.
 Literature Review

• An algorithm based on Discrete Wavelet Transform

(DWT) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier
is used to detect the epileptic signal from the EEG
signal.[1]

• The Artificial neural networks is used to classify the

diagnosis of seizure patients. Twenty-Two channeled
are used.The accuracy is in training data set is
82.051% and in the validation data set is 83.333%.[2]
 Literature Review

• Artificial neural Network is used to design a system

to detect Parkinson disease. They used the
speech/voice signals of healthy person and patient
suffering from Parkinson disease. They achieved
overall 85.29% accuracy in Parkinson disease
detection[3].

• K-Nearest Neighbours to detect Parkinson from

speech/voice signal. They achieved 80% accuracy
with K-Nearest Neighbours.[4]
 Literature Review

• An automated system for detection of

Parkinson disease based on voice analysis.
They use SVM as a classifier. They achieved an
accuracy of 90.5% in recognition of
Parkinson[5].
 Problem Defination
• It is very important to design a reliable and
efficient predictive diagnosis system with high
accuracy.

• Till now the diagnostic system is design for

only few numbers of neurological disorders.
 Proposed System
• Design a predictive diagnostic system for
Epileptic seizures and Schizophrenia with high
accuracy.

• The system will be configured with healthy

persons' EEG signals and patients’ EEG signals
Implementation Steps
 Algorithm
Input: EEG signals
Output: Diagnosed Disease/Disorder

• Step1. Read EEG signals.

• Step2. Data Preprocessing.
2.1 Null value filling.
2.2 Scaling the data values.
• Step3. DWT of EEG Signals.
3.1 Feature extraction.
• Step4. Train the classifiers.
• Step5. Test the classifiers.
 EEG-SSV-EP

• EEG signals with 256 channels captured from

11 subjects.
• 256channel HydroCel Geodesic Sensor Net
(HCGSN) is used for recording the signals.
• Sampling rate is 250 per second.
 CHB-MIT Scalp EEG Database
• This database, collected at the Children’s
Hospital Boston.
• Databases were collected from 22 subjects (5
males, ages 3–22; and 17 females, ages 1.5–
19).
• Dataset have 24 channels
• All signals were sampled at 256 samples per
second.
 button-tone-sz
• 64 channels are used for capturing the signals.
• Contains 81 subjects.
• 35 subjects are control subjects
• 46 subjects are patients.
 Conclusion
• The system is based on pattern recognition of
EEG signals.
• Artificial Neural Network is going to be used as
learning classifiers.
THANK YOU
 References
• [1] Kumar, A., & Kolekar, M. H. (2014, November). Machine learning approach for epileptic
seizure detection using wavelet analysis of EEG signals. In Medical Imaging, m-Health and
Emerging Communication Systems (MedCom), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 412-
416). IEEE.).
• [2] Khemphila, A., & Boonjing, V. (2012). Parkinsons disease classification using neural
network and feature selection. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 64,
15-18.
• [3] Sharma, A., & Giri, R. N. (2014). Automatic recognition of Parkinson’s Disease via artificial
neural network and support vector machine. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng, 4(3), 35-41.
• [4] Logothetis, N. K., & Pfeuffer, J. (2004). On the nature of the BOLD fMRI contrast
mechanism. Magnetic resonance imaging, 22(10), 1517-1531.
• [5] Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of
structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(3), 186. [14] Das, R.
(2010). A comparison of multiple classification methods for diagnosis of Parkinson disease.
Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1568-1572.