Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Modem utility planning approach is based on the view that utilities can better utilize
their resource by looking into not only the supply options but also the strategies than
can influence the timing and the level of demand. The strategy of providing reliable
electricity supply at the lowest overall cost with a mix of supply-side and demand-side
resources is known as least-cost utility planning (also known as "integrated resource
planning"). [For a more detailed account of least cost planning approach, see e.g.
Krause and Eto (1988), and Moskovitz (1989)]. The present paper will, in the following
sections, limit itself to the discussion of demand-side approaches.
Demand Side Management (DSM): Overview
Table 1. Peak-Load and Total Installed Capacity Additions in the 1990s in Asia Region, MW
Peak Load Total Capacity Total Capacity
Country 1989 1989+ 2001* Added in 1989-2001
Bangladesh 1,388 1,960 3,600 1,640
Burma 528 711 1,458 747
China 78,077 116,119 318,317 202,198
Fiji 48 147 199.2 52.2
India 47,013 59,149 111,777 52,628
Indonesia 4,975 8,687 20,821.5 12,134.5
Korea (South) 13,485 21,295 52,085 30,790
Lao-PDR 159 169 425 256
Malaysia 3,347 5,226 13,758 8,532
Nepal 177 260 388 128
Papua-N.G 127 221 554 333
Philippines 3,719 5,788 13,242 7,454
Sri Lanka 625 1,216 1,606.5 390.5
Thailand 6,098 7,269 20,791 13,522
Total 159,766 228,217 559,022.2 330,805.2
+ Source: Moore and Smith (1990)
*Source: www.eia.doc.gov
Demand Side Management (DSM): Overview
Table 2 Total installed and peak load capacity in ASEAN region, 2000
Country Total installed capacity (MW) Peak load capacity (MW)
Cambodia 145 155
Brunei Darussalam 706 398
Indonesia 20,762 14944*
Laos 642 **
Malaysia - Peninsular 7,500 9,712
Malaysia - Sarawak 816 526
Malaysia- Sabah 785 391
Myanmar 1007 750#
Philippines 7000 **
Singapore 6600 4695
Thailand 22,269 14,918
Vietnam 6,253 4,800*
Source: www.aseanenergy.org
* Data are taken from graph
** Not Available
# Data for 1998-1999
DSM Programs
Demand-side management (DSM) activities "are those which involve actions on the demand-or
customer-side of the electric meter, either directly caused or indirectly stimulated by the
utility",[Gellings and Chamberlin (1988, P.2)]. Popular among the DSM activities include direct
load control, thermal storage electrification, strategic conservation, and innovative rates. Of
these five programmes, the first four are mainly technological in nature while innovative rates are
related to pricing. The technological options will be described in the remainder of this section
while the innovative rate structure will be discussed in the next section.
DSM Programs
Direct Control of Customer Load
It is related to the alteration of a customer's end-use appliance in order to change the level of
maximum demand and thus the system load. Utilities may control customer's load either through
remote controlled signals or locally at the point of use. Major types of devices used for the
purpose include time switch, thermostat, current limiter. The loads that are generally considered
for direct control are air conditioners, water-heaters, space-heaters and irrigation pumps.
Customer load control could also be achieved in response to the price signals given by the utility.
In either case (whether load is directly controlled by the utility or by the customer) it is assumed
that there exists an agreement between the utility and the customers for the load control
arrangement.
DSM Programs
Thermal Storage
This technique is useful to achieve strategic load growth through valley filling in load
profile and for load shifting. This option involves the use of an equipment that can vary
energy input while maintaining the energy delivery schedule. Water heating and space
conditioning services are the popular targets for the use of thermal storage option. In
water heating application, heat is stored during the off-peak period and is used during
the peak period. In air cooling applications, coolness storage systems are used to
reduce the peak time load caused by air conditioning units.
Electrification
(a) Building Envelope Programs: These are related to thermal performance of building. These
programs aim at reduction in energy consumption through (i) installation of natural or synthetic
insulation in buildings and (ii) reduction of air infiltration e.g. by sealing structural cracks and
joints.
DSM Programs
(b) Improved Air Conditioner (AC) Efficiency: Use of more efficient AC units can contribute to
reduction of customer peak demand and the utility's peak load. Considerable fuel-economy has
been reported in new generations of ACs. In the US, new models of Central AC units in the 1990s
are expected to require 16 to 33 % less energy per annum while the corresponding reductions for
room ACs would be 20 to 40% as can be seen in Table 3. [Geller (1988)].
(d) Improved Water Heating Efficiency: Water heating is one of the major users of
electricity in residential and commercial buildings in some countries. Significant efficiency
improvements are taking place in the technology of electric water heating, it is estimated that
advanced technologies for 1990's could require 6 to 38% less energy than the best model
produced in 1986 (Table 3].
DSM Programs
Lighting is the most common and, in the case of some poor countries, perhaps the most
important component of household load contributing to the system peak. Wide variety of high
efficiency lamps are now available. Promotion of high efficiency lamps would offer the potential
for substantial reduction in customer load as well as in the system peak load. For example, even if
moderately more efficient lamps that require 10% less power than the traditional fluorescent
lamps were used by households, generation capacity avoided in 1987 would be in the range of 0.
8 to 2.5% of the total capacity in ten countries of Asia as shown in Table 6.
Table 5 shows the level of electricity generation that could be technically avoided from the use of
efficient appliances in 1997 and 2011. It can be seen from the table that the total power
generation that could be technically avoided across the selected countries ranges from 8% in
Thailand to 19% in Sri Lanka in 2011.
DSM Programs
(e) Energy Efficient Appliances: These mainly include refrigerators, rice-cookers, freezer and
lighting in the context of a developing country utility. The ownership of other appliances e.g.
electric range, micro-wave ovens cloth-washers while sizable in industrialized countries is mostly
insignificant in developing countries.
There have been significant improvement in refrigerator and lighting technologies in terms of
their energy efficiencies. For example, refrigerator units available in Thailand in 1990 were
reported to have unit energy consumption of 350-1080 kWh per year MEC (1990)] as compared
to 750 kWh per year for the best model produced in the U.S. in 1986 (Geller, 1988).
The ownership of electrical appliances is growing rapidly in many developing countries, the
growth being particularly high in the urban areas. The option of promoting the use of efficient
appliances in developing countries becomes even more attractive (than in industrialized
countries) if one considers the fact that the relatively more expensive appliances e.g. refrigerators
have slower rates of retirement in these countries.
DSM Programs
Table 6: Generation avoided by different efficient end-use options in selected countries, GWh.
(f) Energy Efficient Motor Systems (EEMs): Over 40% of electricity consumption in
developing countries is estimated to be used by electric motors [USAID (1988)]. Thus, the EEMs
which are designed to optimize energy efficiency rather than material costs of motor production -
can offer significant potential for reductions in electrical load in developing countries. According
to de Almeida et al (1990), efficiency improvement with EEMs varies from 6 % for 5 hp motors to
3% for 150 hp motors. The price of EEMs is reported to be normally 15-25 % (i.e. US$ 8-12/hp)
higher than that of standard motors, the paybacks in the U.S context are normally under two
years in the case of a new application with a large number of operating hours.
Similarly, the availability of electronic adjustable speed drives (ASD) in recent years have made
the continuous variation of AC motors feasible offering a large potential for reductions in drive
power consumption. In the U.S., for example, the use of variable speed drive is estimated to save
the drive power by 20% while the combined use of ASDs with other efficient motor technologies
could increase the savings to 30% [Almeida et al. (1990)].
DSM Programs
Table 6: Percentages of Avoided Generation and Capacity Saved in 1987 with
the Use of Lamps Requiring 10% Less Power in Household Sector
Country Electricity Generation Avoided Generation Capacity Avoided
The most convenient targets for the promotion of EEMs and electronic ASDs are the industrial,
and commercial customers. The utilities could actively develop awareness among such customers
(both existing, and potential) on the benefits of these technologies.
Innovative Rates
3 INNOVATIVE RATES
Electricity demand is subject to wide variation over time. The fact that electricity cannot be
economically stored (at least in a large scale) requires utilities to have a sufficient capacity to
meet the peak demand in the system. Growth of peak demand in excess of the existing capacity
would require construction of a new power plant by the utility.
Economic efficiency requires that price of electricity at any period of the day reflect the cost of
supplying the marginal unit of electricity at that period. In other words, value (i.e. price) of
electricity should be equated with marginal cost of supply. In practice, tariffs in most developing
countries are flat in that they do not reflect the varying costs of production over different time of
a day and as such, they do not promote efficiency in the use of electricity.
Several innovative rate structures are being adopted by utilities in industrialized countries with a
view to promote efficient use and to reduce the level of peak demand. They can also be
considered by developing country utilities. Popular among the innovative rates include the
following:
•Time-of-use rates
•Interruptible rates
•Special purpose rates
Time of Use Rates
Time-of-Use (TOU) Rates
A key objective in designing TOU rates is to provide "correct" signals to the customers on the
temporal variations in electricity supply costs. Both the demand charge, and energy charge can
vary during a year. The rates could offer seasonal variations i.e. separate rate schedules for peak-,
and off-peak seasons. Even within a season or a month, rates could vary by time-of-day to reflect
the hourly variations in costs.
For designing a TOU rate that is consistent with both revenue requirement objective and the
efficient pricing objective it is important to have a good understanding of the likely price
elasticities of demand by TOU periods and/or substitution elasticities across TOU periods. Such
information, however, can be available only after the rates are implemented. Utilities could
benefit in this respect by initiating experimental TOU rates.
Time of Use Rates
The elasticities can vary widely between a customer that has a large discretionary load and one
that has very little or no such load [See e.g. Shrestha and Wan (1990)]. Only a few utilities in Asia
have implemented the TOU rates so far for at least a class of customers: These include the
utilities in South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. However, not much is known
about the effect of TOU rates in load management for these countries. In the case of Korean
Electric Power Company (KEPCO), an estimate suggests that the TOU pricing reduced the system
load in July 1982 by 986 MW which was over 10% of the peak demand (ADB, 1989).
The effectiveness of TOU rates in modifying the load pattern depends on several factors. Of
particular importance are the level of discretionary load in the use of electricity by a customer,
the constraints in shifting an activity from the peak-period of a day to off- peak periods and the
level of price incentives (or disincentive) implied by the TOU rates.
In the case of an end-use that, for some reason, cannot be shifted form peak- to other periods, it
could be necessary to set a sufficiently high demand charge during the peak period in order to
make the replacement of the existing appliance (related to the particular end use) with a more
efficient one feasible.
Interruptible Rates
Interruptible Rates
Such rates are designed to provide capacity savings to utilities. Participating customers are
offered a reduced demand charge if they allow their service to be interrupted by the utility for a
specific period of time. Participants may also be given the option to choose the frequency of
interruption, maximum duration, and the magnitude of the interruptible load.
Often, utilities also offer incentive payments to customers allowing demand interruptions. Such
incentives are designed on the basis of net cost that would be avoided by the utility from
interrupting the customer load.
Similarly incentive payments could be designed to reduce the utility's energy costs. The maximum
level of incentive per kWh of interruptible energy would be based on the marginal energy cost
avoided by the utility net of energy cost to the customers and the metering costs.
Special Purpose Rates
Utilities can also design special rates for customers who meet specific DSM requirements. In such
rates, the qualifying customers will be offered lower charges. For example, customers who install
thermal insulation in buildings in accordance with the prescribed thermal standard could be
offered a special rate incentive. Similarly, customers who install solar appliances with the
potential to reduce customer load during peak period could also be the targets for special rates.
Load Shape Objective and DSM Options
4. Load Shape Objective and DSM Options
Each DSM program can influence the load shape of the customers and hence that of the utility
system in particular ways. The expected changes in load shapes are the key basis to evaluate the
potential benefits of any DSM program. On the other hand, the choice of DSM programs could
itself depend upon the load shape objectives of the utility. There are many (in fact infinite)
combinations of load shape change possibilities. The following basic load. shape possibilities are
discussed here for illustration (see Figure 1):
a. Peak Clipping: This is a classic form of load management. It is most commonly practiced
through direct load control of customer's appliances.
b. Valley Filling: This is the second type of traditional load management. It involves building of
off-peak loads. One of the most popular ways to achieve this is the promotion of new water
heating and/or space heating loads.
Load Shape Objective and DSM Options
c. Load Shifting: It is the third classic type of load management and involves shifting load from
peak to off-peak periods. Typical applications here include the use of storage water heating,
storage space heating, and coolness storage.
e. Strategic Load Growth: It involves a general increase in load and not limited only to load
growth during off-peak periods. Expansion of rural electrification program is one popular
example here.
f. Flexible Load Shape: Considering system reliability as a variable in utility planning, changes in
reliability and load shapes could be affected through different DSM programs. Variations in
interruptible load is one of the options here.
Load Shape Objective and DSM Options
Peak Strategic
Clipping Conservation
Strategic Load
Valley Growth
Filling
It should be noted that for an effective implementation of DSM programs, the utilities need to
devise appropriate incentive schemes which could include a favorable rate structure and/or other
kinds of incentives.
Formulation of incentives schemes for a DSM Program requires d thorough analysis of potential
benefits and costs related to the program. Incentive payments require careful estimation since
payments in excess of program savings could eventually result in an increased cost to
nonparticipant customers of the utility.
There are also equity issues to be considered in defining who should qualify for the incentives.
For example if an incentive program is to be applicable only to those customers who participate
in the program after the program has been launched, then customers who have, for some reason,
met the requirements since an earlier date would appear to have been unfairly discriminated.
Issues on Demand Side Management Incentives
Implementation of some incentive programs can also face the problem of enforcing the
requirements associated with the programs. It is necessary that costs of enforcement be taken
into account while assessing the desirability of a particular program. In general, other things
remaining the same, a program with higher cost of enforcement and monitoring should be less
preferable to one that is easier and less expensive to enforce.
Even if a DSM program is found to be attractive, a developing country may face the problem of
financing it if the program involves a substantial level of utility investment e.g. if the option
involves a huge amount of utility subsidy in the replacement of inefficient electrical appliances. To
a large extent, the policy of international financing sources on investment in DSM project
Evaluation of DSM Programs
After a DSM program is identified, the evaluation of the program basically involves the following
three steps:
i. Market share analysis (It analyzes the potential participation level in the program).
ii. Load-shape impact analysis (It involves statistical analysis of customer load shape
changes which will be the basis for the derivation of the system wide load shape
changes).
iii. Net benefit of the program (For a program to be cost effective, the program's cost
should be less than or equal to avoided costs. Economic analysis of a program are
conducted from different perspectives e.g. Participant's perspective, nonparticipant's
perspective, utility's perspective, and societal perspective [For details, see e.g. Krause
and Ito (1988)]).
Selection of DSM programs for implementation should compare among other things, the relative
benefits (or the economic savings) of the various alternatives, the relative ease of
implementation (e.g. enforcement and monitoring of conditions attached to incentive programs).
Final Remarks
Electric utilities are mostly in public sector domain in developing countries. Many of these utilities
depend heavily on either the allocation of government funds or on foreign capital for their
capacity expansions. Since utilities compete with the rest of public sectors in the economy for
government budget allocation and for capital investment from abroad, it is to the interest of the
utilities and the economy on the whole that the utilities optimize their resource use considering
both the supply-side and the demand-side options. Utilities need to be innovative to exploit the
potential benefits of demand side management options. They need to conduct serious studies to
identify the set of economically viable DSM programs. Some DSM programs may require changes
in government policies. When this becomes necessary, the utilities should actively seek
appropriate changes in government policies in order to develop a more efficient system of
electricity supply and use in the economy.
In order to be able to benefit from demand-side management, it is essential that utilities select
the optimum set of DSM programs. Such a selection requires sound understanding of customer
load characteristics of major end-uses, ownerships of major appliances and their energy
efficiency on the part of utility planners. At present, such data-base does not exist with most
developing country utilities. Serious efforts are warranted in this direction for the utilities to be
able to exploit the potential benefits of demand-side management.
Exercises
1. Discuss the various possible load shape objectives of an electric utility. Give some examples
of the corresponding demand-side management programs.
2. Define the rebound effect associated with end-use energy efficiency improvement programs.
What are its implications for electricity planning? State what information you would need in
order to determine the rebound effect. Explain how would you take the rebound effect into
account in a generation expansion planning exercise.