DATA OVERVIEW

Jenny Leclair
Ford Elementary
November 2019
 The purpose of this presentation is to present Ford Elementary
School’s data.

The data drill down will give teachers and school leaders an
understanding of what areas of strengths and weaknesses.

The data graphs include demographics, performance, and

comparisons to determine where improvements can be made
PURPOSE for teaching and learning.

Identify content areas and focus on where curriculum can be

improved to support students to reach higher levels of
proficiency.

The data trend will be useful for knowing how Ford Elementary
is performing compared to the county and state and make
future goals.
 GUIDING QUESTIONS

• 1. How are students at Ford Elementary performing?

• 2. In what content areas of curriculum and
instruction are weak or inconsistent?
• 3. How are the subgroups males and females
performing in the content areas?
• 3. What does the CCRPI scores say about Ford
Elementary?
• 4. How does the CCRPI score at Ford Elementary
compare to the district, and state?
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC
 FORD ELEMENTARY
STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS
2019

Student Demographics 2019

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITY

ENGLISH LEARNERS
STUDENT GROUPS

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

WHITE

MULTI-RACIAL

HISPANIC

BLACK

AMERICAN INDIAN / ALASKAN NATIVE

ASIAN / PACIFIC ISLANDER

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00%
% of students
 FORD ELEMENTARY: STUDENTS BY
RACE/ETHNICITY

Ford Elementary % of Students by race/ethnicity

100%
90%
80% 75% 74% 75%
70%
% of students

60%
50%
40%
30% 25%
20% 16% 15%
10% 10% 10%
10%
0% 0% 0%
0%
African American Hispanic White Asian
Race/Ethnicity

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018

 FORD ELEMENTARY: STUDENT
ENROLLMENT BY RACE/ETHNICITY

Ford Elementary
700 # of Students enrolled by Race/Ethnicity 644

600 573 574

# of students enrolled

500

400

300

200

100 63 63 70
43 41 48
0 0 0
0
African American Asian Hispanic White

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018

 FORD ELEMENTARY TEACHERS

Teachers by Education Level

60

50 11
11 12
40
# of teachers

24
30 24 23

20

10 19 22
17
0
2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
School Year

Total # Teachers with Bachelor's Degree Total # Teachers with Master's Degree
Total # Teachers with Specialist Degree Total # Teachers with Doctorate
 Student enrollment at Ford Elementary is increasing in
each ethnicity/race group. In the school year 2015-2016,
679 enrolled students to 762 enrolled students by the
school year 2017-2018. This increase in enrollment
shows the student body is increasing in size.

Teacher education level at Ford Elementary is high with

teachers who hold a higher degree including master’s
INITIAL degree and specialist degree In year 2015-2016, 35
teachers have their master’s degree which is the same in
OBSERVATIONS year 2017-2018.

Student ethnicity at Ford Elementary is predominately

white students.The percentage of white students for the
year 2015-2016 is 75%. The other groups comprised of
10% of African American,15% Hispanics, and 0% Asian
which was too few of students.
 CCRPI SCORE COMPARISON

College and Career Readiness Performance Indicator (CCRPI) Score

120

100 95.4
92.9
85.4 87.4
79.7
80 77.1 74.7
71.7 72.9
CCRPI Score

60

40

20

0
State Score Cobb County Ford ES
Place

2016 2017 2018

 CCRPI SCORES

CCRI Scores
2019
95
92.2

90
86.1
85
% percentage

80
77.1

75

70

65
Ford Elem State Score Cobb School District
Place
 GEORGIA TESTS- END OF GRADE SUMMARY

Ford ES Georgia Tests- EOG Summary

60.0%
51.6% 52.9%
48.6% 49.3% 50.7%
50.0% 46.3% 44.2% 45.9%
% of student learners

40.0%
31.3% 32.8%
27.0% 27.0% 28.5%
30.0% 26.4%
23.8% 22.1% 23.5%
19.5% 21.3% 20.0%
18.8% 18.7%
20.0% 15.0%
8.6% 10.0%
10.0% 7.2% 5.8% 7.1%
3.3% 4.9% 3.6% 4.3%

0.0%
English Language Arts Mathematics English Language Arts Mathematics English Language Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies
2017-18 2016-17 2015-16
Subject
# of students tested 139 in 2017-2018
# of students tested 122 in 2016-2017
# of students tested 140 in 2015-2016

Beginning Learners Developing Learners Proficient Learners Distinguished Learners

 Ford ES EOG by Subgroup/ Male and Female
Student Performance 2015-2016
70.0%

60.0% 58.4%
57.1% 57.1%

49.4%
50.0% 47.6%
45.5% 46.0%

39.7%

EOG BY SUB
40.0%

% of students
36.5% 36.5%
33.8%

GROUP MALE 30.0% 28.6%

31.7%

AND FEMALES 22.1% 22.1%

2016-2017 20.0% 18.2% 18.2% 19.0%

17.5%
19.0%
17.5%

11.7% 11.7%
9.5%
10.0% 7.8% 7.8% 7.9%
6.3% 6.3%
5.2%
2.6%
1.6%
0.0%
English Mathematics Science Social Studies English Mathematics Science Social Studies
Language Arts Language Arts
Male Female
Subject Area
# of Males tested 77
# of Females tested 63

Series1 Series2 Series3 Series4

 Ford ES EOG by Subgroup Male/Female
Student Performance 2016-2017
60.0%

52.4%
50.8%
50.0% 47.6%
44.1%

EOG BY SUB 40.0%

33.9%

GROUP

% of students
32.2%

30.0% 28.6%

MALES/FEMALES 27.0%

2016-2017 20.0%
20.6%
16.9%
15.9%
13.6%

10.0%
4.8% 5.1%
3.2% 3.4%

0.0%
English Language Arts Mathematics English Language Arts Mathematics
Male Female
Subject
# of student males 63
# of student females 59

Series1 Series2 Series3 Series4

 Ford ES EOG by Subgroup Male/Female
Student Peformance 2017-2018
60.0%

51.7%
50.0%
46.2%

42.3% 41.7%
40.0%
36.7%

% of students
EOG BY 30.0%
26.9%
28.3%

SUBGROUP
25.6%

MALE/FEMALE
20.5% 20.0%
19.2%
20.0%
16.7%

2017-2018 12.8%

10.0%
6.4%
5.0%

0.0%
0.0%
English Language Arts Mathematics English Language Arts Mathematics
Male Female
Subject
# of student males tested 78
# of student females tested 60

Beginning Learners Developing Learners Proficient Learners Distinguished Learners

 OBSERVATIONS

• Based on the CCRPI comparison by state and county, Ford Elementary scored
better than the state and county with 87.4 % in 2016, 95.4% in 2017, and
92.9% in 2018.
• The End of Grade Summary for Ford Elementary show an upward trend in
Math students who are proficient with 44.2% in 2016, 45.9% in 2017, and
49.3% in 2018.
• Male and Female students at Ford Elementary perform differently. In 2015-
2016, male students have a higher percentage of proficiency with 57.1% in
mathematics and 39.4% for female students. This is a 18% difference.
 OBSERVATIONS

• In the 2015-2016 school year, males at Ford Elementary have a higher

proficiency rate in Language Arts at 49.4% than females at 47.6% in English
Language Arts. Males scored a 1.8% more than females.
• In 2016-2017 school year, males at Ford scored a proficiency rate of 52.4% in
English Language Arts and females students proficiency is at 50.8% in English
Language Arts. Males scored a 1.6% higher than females.
• In 2017-2018 school year, male students scored higher with 46.2 % in Math
compared to female student proficiency at 41.7% in Math. Males scored a 4.5%
more than females.
 INFERENCES

• When looking at data, Ford Elementary has a history of being a high quality, well educated
teachers, and high CCRPI student scores above the state and district for the past three school
years. This puts Ford at one of the top performing schools in Cobb.
• The drill down data, shows that trends exist when looking at the performance of subgroups by
male and female. Male students outperform students in areas of proficiency in math and
language arts. The proficiency gap can be due to more male students than female students.
• Also the trends of male and female groups can be due to male students performing better on
testing than female students. Instructional strategies could also vary from females to males.
Male students generally perform better in tasks that are objective and females on subjective
tasks.
• The data team at Ford Elementary can use this presentation to guide discussion questions
1. Are teachers aware of the slight achievement gap among gender groups? Does this change
how we teach males and females?
2. What can teachers do to challenge student to raise the percentage of distinguished learners?