Curriculum Evaluation

through
Learning Assessment
Assessment Tools to
Measure Authentic
Learning Performance
and Products (KPUP)
Prepared by:
DIANA ROSE P. CABILIN
Performance Assessment Tools
Checklist
Rating Scale
Rubrics for Portfolio
Checklist
- a tool that consists of a list of qualities that are
expected to be observed as present or absent. The
presence is to be marked (/) and the absence is
marked (X)
Rating Scale
- a tool that uses a scale in a number line as a basis to
estimate the numerical value of a performance or a
product. The value is easier to score if the points are in
whole numbers. The most popular rating scale is
called LIKERT SCALE.
Rating Scale
Rubrics for Portfolio
- a portfolio is a compilation of the experiences as
authentic learning outcomes presented with
evidence and reflections. To assess the total learning
experiences as presented in a wholistic package, an
assessment tool called a RUBRIC is utilized.
Holistic Rubric
3 The waitperson greets patrons promptly, and is courteous and friendly, but not
overly so. He/she takes the order accurately and serves the food while it is still
hot. He/she is attentive to the patron’s needs and calculates the bill correctly.

2 The waitperson is not quite as prompt or courteous. He/she may be unfriendly or

overly so. He/she may forget minor parts of the patron’s order or serve the food
slightly cool. He/she neglects the patrons or miscalculates the bill.

1 The waitperson is not prompt. He/she is rude or unconcerned with patron’s

needs. He/she gets the order wrong or makes the patrons wait . Many mistakes
are made in the bill.
Analytic-Trait Rubric
Greeting Attentiveness Service Billing
10% 15% 60% 15%

3 The waitperson greets The waitperson is attentive to The waitperson takes the The waitperson
patrons promptly. patron’s needs. order accurately and serves calculates the bill
food promptly. accurately.

The waitperson lets The waitperson is somewhat The waitperson makes a The waitperson makes a
2 patrons sit for a few attentive to patron’s needs. minor mistake in the order minor mistake in the
minutes before greeting. or does not serve food bill.
promptly.

The waitperson lets The waitperson totally ignores The waitperson gets the The waitperson
1 patrons sit for several the needs and requests of order wrong or serves the completely
minutes before greeting patrons. food cold or both. miscalculates the bill.
them.
Levels of Assessment for the Levels of Learning Outcomes
Percentage
Levels of Learning What to Test/Assess? Type of Assessment Value in
Outcomes/Assessment Assessment
Level 1 – Knowledge Who, What, When, How, Why Pencil & 15%
Paper/Nonpaper and
pencil
Level 2 – Process Skills Constructed meaning from Knowledge Pencil & 25%
Paper/Nonpaper and
Pencil
Level 3 – Explanations, Interpretations, Pencil & Paper 30%
Understanding Applications, Empathy, Perspective and
Self Knowledge. Big ideas, Principles and
Generalizations
Level 4 – Transfer of understanding to life Checklist/Rating 30%
Products/Performance situations as Products, or Performance Scale
Total 100%
Placing Value to the Assessment Results from KPUP
Levels of Proficiency Composite Score In
Description Summative (Grade) in %

Beginning 74 and Below

Developing 75-79
Approaching Proficiency 80-84
Proficient 85-89
Advanced 90 and Above
Placing Value to the Assessment Results in the New
Grading System (DepEd Order 8, s. 2015)
Subjects
Grade Level Components
Lang., AP, EsP Science/Math MAPEH/EPP/TLE

Grade 1 to 10 Written Work 30% 40% 20%

Performance 50% 40% 60%
Task
Quarterly 20% 20% 20%
Exam
TOTAL 100% 100% 100%
 List of Summative Assessment Tools
Learning Area Written Work (WW) Performance Tasks (PT)

SCIENCE A. Unit/Chapter Tests A. Products

B. Written output 1. Investigatory Projects
1. Concept maps 2. Models and Diagrams construction
2. Data recording and analyses 3. Prototype building
3. Laboratory reports and documentations 4. Research papers
4. Reaction/ reflection papers B. Performance-based tasks
5. Surveys 1. Debates
2. Designing and implementation of action plans
3. Designing various models
4. Doing scientific investigations
5. Issue-awareness campaigns
6. Laboratory activity
7. Multimedia presentations
8. Simulation
9. Skills demonstration
10. Verification experiments
 Transmutation Table
Initial Grade Transmuted Grade Initial Grade Transmuted Grade
100 100
98.40 - 99.99 99 66.40 – 67.99 79
96.80 - 98.39 98 64.80 – 66.39 78
95.20 - 96.79 97 63.20 – 64.79 77
93.60 - 95.19 96 61.60 – 63.19 76
92.00 - 93.59 95 60.00 – 61.59 75
90.40 – 91.99 94 56.00 – 59.99 74
88.80 – 90.39 93 52.00 – 55.99 73
87.20 – 88.79 92 48.00 – 51.99 72
85.60 – 87.19 91 44.00 – 47.99 71
84.00 – 85.59 90 40.00 – 43.99 70
82.40 – 83.99 89 36.00 – 39.99 69
80.80 – 82.39 88 32.00 – 35.99 68
79.20 – 80.79 87 28.00 – 31.99 67
77.60 – 79.19 86 24.00 – 27.99 66
76.00 – 77.59 85 20.00 – 23.99 65
74.40 – 75.99 84 16.00 – 19.99 64
72.80 – 74.39 83 12.00 – 15.99 63
71.20 – 72.79 82 8.00 – 11.99 62
69.60 – 71.19 81 4.00 – 7.99 61
68.00 – 69.59 80 0 – 3.99 60
Reporting Summative Grade by Quarter and
Summative Grade at the End of the Year
Grading Scale (based Descriptor
on Transmuted Values)
90-100 Outstanding
85-89 Very Satisfactory
80-84 Satisfactory
75-79 Fairly Satisfactory
Below 75 Did not meet Expectations