various theories which have been proposed in the attempt at explaining the nature of the human language faculty. These theories can be grouped into three broad categories which correspond roughly to historical epochs. Orientation - Period 0) non-theoretical studies - before the 19th century 1) historical linguistics - 19th century 2) structuralism - first half of 20th century 3) generative grammar - second half of 20th century History of Linguistics
• Various linguistic theories have been developed over
the past two centuries as shown above. The school of historical linguistics came to be known in the late 19th century as Neogrammarianism. • Structuralism in the 20th century was introduced by Ferninand de Saussure (1857-1913), a Swiss-French linguist whose original ideas were published in a book posthumously (Cours de linguistique générale, 1916). • Generative grammar was invented and developed by Noam Chomsky (1928- ) and has been the dominant model of formal linguistics in recent decades. History of Linguistics
• Linguistics as a science began at the beginning of the
19th century and was diachronic in its orientation. • The essential theoretical assumption of linguists at this time was that of the sound law which maintains that (phonological) change is without exception unless this is prevented by phonotactic environment. • Later analogical change can mask an earlier change and make it appear irregular by increasing its scope beyond environments in which it originally applied. History of Linguistics
• In the latter half of the 19th century linguistic
techniques reached a highwater mark and the linguists involved are known today as Neogrammarians (Junggrammatiker). • One of their main concerns was the reconstruction of the proto-language Indo- European from which nearly all languages in Europe and many in the Middle East and northern India are derived. History of Linguistics
• The advent of structuralism at the beginning of the 20th
century is associated with Ferdinand de Saussure, a French- Swiss scholar whose ideas have had a lasting effect on the linguistic thought of following generations. • Saussure stressed the interaction at any one time of elements in a language's structure and maintained that these were interrelated in a network of relations. • Diachrony is in his view just a stringing together of various synchronic slices, so that the structure of a language at one point in time is primary and historical considerations are dependent on the principles derived from viewing language synchronically. History of Linguistics
• The consideration of system structure has led
to a functional view of language change which recognises both simplification and repair along with avoidance of merger as valid types of change. History of Linguistics
• The generative approach to language change sees it
primarily as rule change which becomes part of the internalised grammar of a certain generation and remains so until replaced by another rule change. • This type of change is always binary, i.e. a rule is either present or not, and as such has been rejected by many, notably by sociolinguists, who argue that there is often a variable application of rules and that speakers can have a command of several subsystems whose use is determined by external, social factors. History of Linguistics • India • 400 BC • Panini composed his Sansrkit grammar known as the Astadhyayi ‘eight books’. History of Linguistics
• Greece 5th century BC - onwards
• Pre-Socratic philosophers and later Sophists Socrates (469-399 BC); Plato (c.427-348 BC); Aristotle (384-322 BC) The Stoics (4th century BC) History of Linguistics
Rome 1st century BC to approx. 500 AD
• Varro (116-27 BC); Donatus (mid 4th century AD); Priscian (c.500 AD) The Dark Ages 5th to 8th centuries • Boethius (480-524) Isidore of Seville (St.Isidorus) (c.560-636) Sibawaih (8th century, Persian grammarian of Arabic) History of Linguistics
The Middle Ages 10th to 14th centuries
• Ælfric the Grammarian (955-1020) [England] The First Grammatical Treatise (12th century) [Iceland] Robert Grosseteste (c.1170-1253) [England] Roger Bacon (c.1214-1292) [England] Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) [Italy] Dante Alighieri (1265-1321) [Italy] Duns Scotus (c.1266-1308) Thomas of Erfurt (14th century) [Germany] History of Linguistics • The Renaissance15th to 18th centuries Erasmus (1466-1535) [Holland] Petrus Ramus (c.1515-1572) [France] Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540-1609) [France] Franciscus Sanctius (1554-1628) [Spain] Francis Bacon (1561-1626) [England] John Locke (1632-1704) [Scotland] George Berkeley (1685-1753) [Ireland] David Hume (1711-1776) [Scotland] René Descartes (1591-1650) [France] Benedictus Spinoza (1632-1677) [Holland] Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) [Germany] Port Royal Grammar (1660) [France] History of Lingusitics • 19th century: Indo-European studies
Main early figures
• Sir William Jones (1746-1794) [England] • Franz Bopp (1791-1867) [Germany] • August Schlegel (1767-1845) [Germany] • Jakob Grimm (1785-1863) [Germany] • Friedrich Schlegel (1772-1829) [Germany] • August Pott (1802-1887) [Germany] • Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767-1835) [Germany] • August Schleicher (1821-1868) [Germany] • Rasmus Rask (1787-1832) [Denmark] • Johannes Schmidt (1843-1901) [Germany] • August Leskien (1840-1916) [Germany] History of Lingusitics Main later figures • Karl Verner (1846-1896) [Denmark] • Hermann Paul (1846-1921) [Germany] • Karl Brugmann (1849-1919) [Germany] • Baudouin de Courtenay (1845-1929) [Russia] • Hermann Osthoff (1847-1909) [Germany] • Nikolai Kruszewski (1851-1887) [Poland] • Eduard Sievers (1850-1932) [Germany] • Hugo Schuchardt (1842-1927) [Germany] 20th century Structuralism: • Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) [Switzerland] • Edward Sapir (1884-1939) [United States] • Leonard Bloomfield (1887-1949) [United States] • Nikolai Trubetzkoy (1890-1938) [Russia] Generative grammar • Roman Jakobson (1896-1982) [Russia/United States] • Halle, Morris [United States] • Noam Chomsky (1928- ) [United States] Linguistics Historical linguistics • Historical linguistics, also called diachronic linguistics, is the scientific study of language change over time. • Principal concerns of historical linguistics include: to describe and account for observed changes in particular languages. What is meant by modern linguistics? • Linguistics as a study endeavors to describe and explain the human faculty of language. • The 1960s saw the rise of many new fields in linguistics, such as Noam Chomsky's generative grammar, William Labov's sociolinguistics, Michael Halliday's systemic functional linguistics and also modern psycholinguistics. Traditional grammar • A traditional grammar is a framework for the description of the structure of a language. • Traditional grammars are commonly used in language education. They may be contrasted with theories of grammar in theoretical linguistics, which grew out of traditional descriptions of grammar. Definition of Language • SPEECH is so familiar a feature of daily life that we rarely pause to define it. It seems as natural to man as walking, and only less so than breathing. To put it concisely, walking is an inherent, biological function of man. • Not so language. • It is of course true that in a certain sense the individual is predestined to talk, but that is due entirely to the circumstance that he is born not merely in nature, but in the lap of a society that is certain, reasonably certain, to lead him to its traditions. Definition of Language • Speech is a human activity that varies without assignable limit as we pass from social group to social group, because it is a purely historical heritage of the group, the product of long-continued social usage. • It varies as all creative effort varies—not as consciously, perhaps, but none the less as truly as do the religions, the beliefs, the customs, and the arts of different peoples. • Walking is an organic, an instinctive, function (not, of course, itself an instinct); speech is a non-instinctive, acquired, “cultural” function. Definition of Language • Language is a purely human and noninstinctive method of communicating ideas, emotions, and desires by means of a system of voluntarily produced symbols. • These symbols are, in the first instance, auditory and they are produced by the so- called “organs of speech.” Definition of Language • We must not be misled by the mere term. • There are, properly speaking, no organs of speech; there are only organs that are incidentally useful in the production of speech sounds. • The lungs, the larynx, the palate, the nose, the tongue, the teeth, and the lips, are all so utilized, but they are no more to be thought of as primary organs of speech than are the fingers to be considered as essentially organs of piano-playing or the knees as organs of prayer. • Speech is not a simple activity that is carried on by one or more organs biologically adapted to the purpose. • It is an extremely complex and ever-shifting network of adjustments—in the brain, in the nervous system, and in the articulating and auditory organs—tending towards the desired end of communication. Study Questions 1. Based on your readings how would you define language
[Faux titre no. 353] Pint, Kris_ Gemerchak, Christopher M._ Barthes, Roland - The perverse art of reading _ on the phantasmatic semiology in Roland Barthes' Cours au Collège de France (2010, Rodopi).pdf