Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Submitted By::
Tanushree Dwivedi 177
Tanvi Manek 178
Tanvir Raza 179
U Suman Sastry 180
Ved Prakash 181
Vishal Goel 182
Comparison of the manufacturing structures and strategies of DJC’S Kawasaki plant and ACC’S Sunnyvale
plant
Through the following bullet points we will try to highlight the major differences between the manufacturing
structure of DJC’S Kawasaki plant and ACC’S Sunnyvale plant
Kawasaki : Planned from Initiation. Sunnyvale: Capacity and technology was added as and when required.
Kawasaki had a dedicated production unit for each of the four types of connectors developed, thus in
effect having 4 production areas. In comparison, at Sunnyvale, the whole production area was used to develop
all products.
In terms of packaging, the Sunnyvale plant was quite flexible whereas at Kawasaki, packaging was standard,
and was different from the industry standard.
Sunnyvale plant maintained a finished goods inventory of 38 days, whereas Kawasaki maintained a finished
goods inventory of 56 days.
In Kawasaki, the production schedule was fixed and would not change under any circumstance or for any
special order from customers. This gave them an upper edge, in terms of controlling costs. Whereas, in
Sunnyvale, although policy stated that the production schedule for any given day was to be decided upon 30
days in advance, actually the schedule was changed quite frequently to meet customer demands. Thus ,
while the buzz word for the Kawasaki plant was cost cutting, for the Sunnyvale plant it was flexibility.
In terms of products, the Kawasaki plant stressed on continuous and reliable operations and low raw materials
cost. This was because, in Japan, the cost of raw materials was twice as high as in the United States. So while
the Kawasaki people studied and adapted designs from American companies, they did away with most of the
extras that they felt did not add any value for their customers. Thus, despite high difference in raw material
prices, Kawasaki cost per units were only slightly higher than Sunnyvale’s cost per unit connector.
In terms of process, for Kawasaki, the idea was to concentrate on automation.
At Kawasaki, technology used was old and reliable upgraded in-house, as compared with Sunnyvale, where
in the growth years heavy investment had been made into buying new technology as per requirements
Impact of manufacturing strategy of each plant on its ability to achieve different competitive objectives, such as
low cost, high reliability, flexibility and product innovation
They should drop that IN-HOUSE technology development strategy at least for the first few years till the time
they acquire substantial market share in the US and have sales to achieve break even for that.
They have improve their flexibility as 15% of ACC’s production is from customization and the rest is from
four types of products that means 85%, which if divided equally among them is 21.25% of production .
Therefore one looking to compete with ACC in the US cannot ignore this sector.
As one knows how fast electronic industry is growing and everyday or every weekend one can see a new
product in the market so to cater to fast changing environment they should also look for new technologies and
improve them with time too, which they have been ignoring.
If Sunnyvale plant doubles its production run length then it will be very difficult for them to schedule this much
complex production considering they at present are making more than 4500 different connectors. Moreover, it
WIP inventory will increase and finished goods inventory will increase, which will further aggravate the
situation.
DJC is a very serious threat to ACC as by their current at Kawasaki is able to compete them in international arena
when they are working on raw material which is double of the cost of raw material at which ACC is working.
Changes recommend in the operations of ACC’s Sunnyvale plant
They need to change their plant layout and have a separate cellular layout for the mass production of all four
types of connectors which would be working 24*7 considering the demand and have a separate layout for
customization.
They need to have a particular standard for packaging i.e. they are currently packaging at 10 piece plastic bag
to 1500 pieces of loaded reel, which would decrease the worker needed to handle packaging.
They need to automate their process by which they can decrease their man power from 396.