Sie sind auf Seite 1von 29

Departemen Teknik Industri

Systemic & Integrated


Approach

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 1


Departemen Teknik Industri

Integrated Approach
Memandang Sesuatu Secara Menyeluruh
Dan Komprehensif Tidak Bersifat Parsial

Systemic Approach

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 2


Departemen Teknik Industri

Contoh
Shortest Route ?
Origin
A 90 B
84 E 84 I
66
138
C 132
90 132
348
F 60 126
156
H
132 48
126
D
48 J
G 150
Destination

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 3


Departemen Teknik Industri

Step Solved Its Closest Total Time n’th Nearest Its Min. Its Last
Nodes Conc.un Sl Involved Node Time Con’tion

1 A B 90 B 90 AB*
A D 138
A C 348

2 A C 138 C 138 AC
A D 348
B C 90+66=156
B E 90+84=174

3 A D 348
B E 90+84=174 E 174 BE*
C D 138+156=294
C F 138+90=228

4 A D 348
C D 138+156=294
C F 138+ 90=228 F 228 CF
E F 174+132=306
E I 174+84 =258
6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 4
Departemen Teknik Industri

Step Solved Its Closest Total Time n’th Nearest Its Min. Its Last
Nodes Conc.un Sl Involved Node Time Con’tion

5 A D 348
C D 138156=294
E I 174+84=258 I 258 EI*
F G 228132=360
F H 228+60=288

6 A D 348
C D 138+156=294
F G 228+132=360
F H 228+ 60=288 H 288 FH
I H 258+132=390
I J 258+126=384

7 A D 348
C D 138+156=294
F G 228+132=360
H G 288+ 48=336 G 336 HG
I J 258+126=384
6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 5
Departemen Teknik Industri

Step Solved Its Closest Total Time n’th Nearest Its Min. Its Last
Nodes Conc.un Sl Involved Node Time Con’tion

8 A D 348 D 348 AD
C D 138+156=294
G D 336+ 48=384
G J 336+150=486
H J 288+126=414
I J 258+126=384

9 G J 336+150=486
H J 288+126=414
I J 258+126=384 J 384 IJ*

Shortest Route : A B E I J ( 384)

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 6


Departemen Teknik Industri

Solusi
• Parsial
– Methoda : Logik ambil jarak terpendek pada
setiap node
– Hasil : A-B-C-F-H-G-J (494)
• Integrated
– Methoda : Dinamik programmning
– Hasil : A-B-E-I-J ( 384)

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 7


Departemen Teknik Industri

Systemic Aspect
• Structural Aspect
– Man, Machine, Material
• Functional Aspect
– Man-man, Man-Material, Man-Machine, Feed-back
• Boundary
• Environment
– Stakeholder and Societal
• Objective
– Unitary, pluralist, coercive

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 8


Departemen Teknik Industri

Component of Real System

Man

+
Natural System and/or Artificial System

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 9


Departemen Teknik Industri

Schematic Representation
Environment

Boundary

Man Machine

Input Out-put

Mat

Feed-back : Interaction

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 10


Departemen Teknik Industri

Decision Making Process

Decision Solution

Action Kriteria

Real
System
Model
Problem IE Standard

Data /Information

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 11


Departemen Teknik Industri

Characteristic of Integrated Approach

• Problem : Real
• Approach : Systemic
• Model : Valid
• Solution : Feasible
• Decision : Effective
• Action : Implemented

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 12


Departemen Teknik Industri

What IE Has To Do ?
1. Problem Identification
2. Generate Alternatives
3. Know the Standard Models
4. Decide Performance Criteria
5. Choose the Best Solution
6. Make Decision
7. Anticipate Managerial Implication
8. Action
6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 13
Departemen Teknik Industri

Model Building Process


Analyses of System
Modeler •Problem Formulation Real System
•Components Model

Model Formulation

Solution

No
Valid ?

Stop
6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 14
Departemen Teknik Industri

Analysis of System
• Formulate the Problem
• Determine Performance Criteria
• Identification of Components Model
– Decision Variable
– Constraints
– Parameter
– Logical Relationship

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 15


Departemen Teknik Industri

Don’t Confuse

Root
Symptom
Causes

Problem Alternatif
Solusi

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 16


Departemen Teknik Industri

Problem
Any unsatisfactory situation
Symptom
• Claims
• Difference: Expectation vs Reality

Root Causes

Problem
6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 17
Departemen Teknik Industri

Symptom
• Indicator of the Problem
• Problem Could Exist Although Without
Any Symptom
• Form: Claims, Differences Expectation and
Reality

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 18


Departemen Teknik Industri

Symptom

Difference

Expectation Reality
Objective Achievement

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 19


Departemen Teknik Industri

Root Causes

• Causes of the symptom


• Use systemic approach to identify

Fish Bone Diagram

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 20


Departemen Teknik Industri

Fish Bone Diagram


Material Machine Man

Indicator

Environment Boundary Method


6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 21
Departemen Teknik Industri

Performance Criteria
Efficiency

Effective + Min Cost

Objective Vs
Achievement/Actual

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 22


Departemen Teknik Industri

Performance Criteria
A. Types
1. Single Criteria
2. Multi Criteria
B. Level of Management
1. Company level
2. Business level
3. Operational level

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 23


Departemen Teknik Industri

Components Model

• Performave Criteria
• Decision Variable
• Constraints
• Parameter
• Logical Relationship

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 24


Departemen Teknik Industri

Model Formulation

Determine the relationship among


performance criteria, variables,
parameters and constraints

Objective function : V = f ( Xi, Yi, Ai )


Constraints : f ( Xi, Yi, Ai ) < Bi

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 25


Departemen Teknik Industri

Solution

• Solve the Problem


• Reflect Variable Decision
• Input For Making Decision

Feasible Best Optimal


( Simulasi ) ( Heuristic) ( Analytic)
6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 26
Departemen Teknik Industri

Validation
• Logical Validation (Verification)
Is the Model Logic and Rational ?
• Historical Validation
Is the Model Fit With the Past Performance ?
• Result Validation
Is the Model Fit With the Future Performance ?

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 27


Departemen Teknik Industri

Decision
Problem

Decision Criteria

Solution + Judgment
Scientific Art
6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 28
Departemen Teknik Industri

Action
How Decision Could Be Implemented ?

Anticipate Managerial Implication


And
Prepare Implementation Plan

Action

6. Sytemic & Integrated Approach 29

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen