Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Mesh Networks
Queueing Theory
Network Models
Cross Layer Routing Relay Nodes
Economic Models
Information Theory
Collaborative PHY Cognitive Radio
PHY-NET gap more pronounced as wireless networks migrate from single hop/centralized control to multi-hop/decentralized control
Timely for the community to try and close the gap through collaboration and increased awareness across sub-disciplines
Physical Layer Perspective
• New generation of codes (LDPC, turbo, etc.)
• MIMO now in the technology mainstream
• Cognitive radio and dynamic spectrum emerging
• Recent progress on collaborative PHY and network
coding, particularly on the theory side
• Near-future PHY advances may have a significant
impact on network design:
– Potential for major performance gains
– Involve a new kind of radio API (abstraction)
– Need to re-evaluate conventional PHY/MAC/net layers
– Require protocol support for distributed control
Network Layer Perspective
• Wireless network research at a particularly active stage
due to:
– Increasing availability of commodity radios
– Moore’s law improvements in bit-rate
– Economic viability of new applications
• Development of future networking systems challenged by
unique wireless medium
– Still using old wired “link” model for radios
– Existing (broadcast) and future (MIMO, network coding) yet to be exploited
– Serious MAC layer issues in multi-hop networks
– Need for generic radio API’s and software control
– Performance of layered designs considered inadequate
– Decentralized control protocols yet to be defined
Ideas for Bridging the Gap
• Theory topics include:
– New tools for PHY analysis (harmonizing combinatorial network models
with continuous PHY models)
– Tractable PHY models for improved realism/net technology
– System models with source/session burstiness
– Accounting for control protocol overheads
– Improved interference models for multi-hop nets
– Integrating mobility into theoretical models
– Multi-hop network optimization
– Impact of collaborative PHY & network coding on network performance
– Delay as a key metric
Ideas for Bridging the Gap
• Technology topics include:
– Generalized PHY abstractions for use by network designers – describing
MIMO, directional antennas, interference,…
– Trade-offs between modulation, synchronization, soft error recovery, etc.
– Location as a basic PHY parameter?
– New concepts for multi-hop MAC – should this be a PHY+ issue?
– Distributed radio resource management algorithms
– Control protocol design and implementation
– Cross-layer network protocols for discovery, routing, …
– Decentralized monitoring and dissemination (..fault tolerance)
– Practical protocols for network coding and collaborative PHY
– New transport layer protocols (beyond TCP) and impact on applications
Recommendations to NSF
• Focus on “PHY-NET gap” is timely potential for large
performance gains particularly in multi-hop networks
• Collaborative team projects likely to be needed
• Educational aspects (e.g. comm theory for CS majors and
systems exposure for EE’s) should be considered
• Establish a joint conference to encourage joint PHY/net
research, improve mutual understanding
• New PHY-NET research program on major challenges:
– Unified IT/comm theory for wireless networks
– Optimization of cross-layer systems
– Decentralized control in multi-hop wireless
– “open systems” protocols for cross-layer, collaborative PHY
(….project ideas for each topic above given in earlier slides)
Participants
• Dharma Agrawal
• Michael Fang
• Mingyan Liu
• Rockey Luo
• Urbashi Mitra
• David Tse
• Jie Wu
• Edmund Yeh
• Junshan Zhang
• Kang Shin
• D. Raychaudhuri