Linguistic Ettiquetteppt

Syntax
A Review of General Language Etiquette
Original Draft, Wu Hepen, Northwest Normal School

Modified: Dr. Thomas. Eaton, 2009
© BTexact Technologies 2001

Key Points Highlighted
 Syntax
 Types of Grammar
 American structuralism and its brief history
 IC Analysis
 Syntactic Categories
 Lexical Categories
 Chomsky and UG

Syntax
 Syntax: the study of the structure of

sentences and the grammatical rules
governing the way words are combined to
form sentences.

Types of Grammar
 Prescriptive Grammar
 Descriptive Grammar
 Universal Grammar

Prescriptive Grammar
Traditional Grammar and the prescriptive

approach: Grammar as ‘linguistic etiquette’,
i.e. the identification of the best/proper
structures to be used;

Descriptive Grammatical Rules
 Descriptive rules are more general and more

basic than prescriptive rules in the sense
that all sentences of a language are formed
in accordance with them, not just the subset
of sentences that count as correct or socially
acceptable.

Prescriptive Rules
 Grammar is a collection of rules concerning

what counts as socially acceptable and
unacceptable language use. These rules in
question primarily concern the proper
composition of sentences in written
language.
- Don’t start a sentence with a conjunction
- Don’t end a sentence with a preposition
- Don’t use sentence fragments
- Don’t use dangling participles
- Don’t use a plural pronoun to refer back to a singular noun;
etc.
 e.g. Over there is the guy who I went to the party with
Descriptive Grammar
 Rules of descriptive grammar have the status of

scientific observations, and they are intended as
insightful generalizations about the way that human
language is used in fact, rather than about how it
ought to be used.
- Articles precede the nouns they belong to
- Relative clauses follow the noun that they modify
- Prepositions precede their objects

Grammatical sentences
 An ungrammatical sentence is conventionally

prefixed with an asterisk (*) while the grammatical
sentences are usually not specifically marked.
- ( ) Over there is guy the who I went to party the
with
- ( )Over there is the man I went to the party with
guy
- ( )Over there is the guy who I went to the party
with
- ( )Over there is the guy with whom I went to the
party

Prescriptive vs. Descriptive
 Rules of etiquette or laws of

society
 Rules about correct or
 Rules about all sentences of
socially accepted sentences a language
 Rules explicitly taught  Rules followed effortlessly
 Based on the more favored
and consistently
 Document all variants without
variants
discrimination
- …The verb SHOULD agree - …the verb CAN agree in
in number with the logical number with EITHER the
subject expletive subject OR with the
logical subject
 There’s some boxes left on the porch
 There are some boxes left on the porch

Universal Grammar
 Grammar as a form of internal linguistic

knowledge that operates in the appropriate
production and comprehension of natural
languages.

Goals of a theory of grammar
- Universality: a theory of grammar should provide us with

the tools needed to describle the grammar of any natural
language adequately.
- Descriptive adequacy: a grammar of a given language
has descriptive adequacy if it explains observed language
data and the intuitions of native speakers about the
grammaticality of sentences of a language
- Explanatory adequacy: a theory of grammar has
explanatory adequacy if it explains how native speakers
of a language can arrive at the knowledge of that
language.
- Learnability: an adequate linguistic theory must provide
adequate grammars which are learnable by young
children in a relatively short period of time. i.e., it must
account for the uniformity and rapidity of language
acquisition, given the poverty of stimulus.

American Structuralism
 A brief history
 How is descriptive linguistics done?
 IC Analysis

American Structuralism: A brief history
 Descriptive linguistics is the study and analysis of spoken language. The

techniques of descriptive linguistics were devised by German American
anthropologist Franz Boas and American linguist and anthropologist
Edward Sapir in the early 1900s to record and analyze Native American
languages.
 Franz Boas: Handbook of American Indian Languages (1911
- He saw grammar as a description of how human speech in a
language is organized. A descriptive grammar should describe the
relationships of speech elements in words and sentences.
 Leonard Bloomfield,
- best known for his commitment to linguistics as an independent
science and his insistence on using scientific procedures.
- His major work, Language (1933) is regarded as the classic text of
structural linguistics, also called structuralism.
 Norm Chomsky
- had studied structural linguistics, was seeking a way to analyze the
syntax of English in a structural grammar.
- This effort led him to see grammar as a theory of language structure
rather than a description of actual sentences.

How is descriptive linguistics done?
 A corpus of data
 Segmentation
 Identification of the phonemes
 Which phonemes can combine to form morphemes
 How morphemes combine into phrases and
sentences.

IC analysis
 The basic concern of the descriptive approach is to investigate the

distribution of forms in a language. The method used is one of
substitution.
 Constituent: a grammatical unit which is part of a larger grammatical
unit
-- e.g., sentence = noun phrase + verb phrase;
noun phrase = determiner + noun; "subject", ”verb", "determiner" and
"noun" etc. are constituents
 IC analysis is designed to show how small constituents in a sentence

combine to form larger constituents.
 My || parents | bought ||| two tickets || at ||| Christmas.

More exercises on IC analysis
 Colorless green ideas sleep furiously

 John found a fly in the soup
 the young king who gave up his throne
 the man from the city in the little country from
Western Europe

Labelled Tree Diagram and
S
Bracketing
NP VP
Pron N VP PP
V NP P N
Det N
My parents bought two tickets at Christmas
[S[NP [Pron my][N parents]]VP[VP[V bought]NP[Det two][N tickets]]PP[P at] [N Christmas]]]]
 Three aspects of a speaker’s syntactic knowledge are

explicitly represented in tree diagrams:
- The linear order of the words in the sentence
- The groupings of words into syntactic categories
- The hierarchical structure of the syntactic categories
Syntactic categories
 A family of expressions that can substitute for one

another without loss of grammaticality is called a
syntactic category.
- The cat chases the mouse.
- The dog chases the mouse
- The policeman chases the mouse.
- The mother mouse chases the mouse.
 If words and phrases could not be assigned to a
small group of categories, it would be very hard to
learn or use a language.

Syntax: Lexical Categories
 Lexical Categories:
- every word is a member of a category.
- a word’s category type determines the kind of phrase it
can form
- a phrase is a word or string of words that functions as a
unit in a sentence, built around a head
- Every language has specific phrase structure rules
determining how phrases can be combined to form
sentences

 Noun (N):
- real, imaginary, abstract things
- In English, if nouns refer to countable things, the
regular plural is made by suffixing -s/-es
- In English they can be paired with articles and
demonstratives
 EX: the book, this book, that book, etc.
- In English they can be modified with descriptive words
(adjectives)

Noun Phrases (NP)
NP NP NP
Det N Det A N N
the student the controversial book it

[NP[Det the [N student]]
 Evidence that NPs are syntactic units comes from the fact they can often be replaced by
a single word such as the pronoun they or it
- The students read the controversial book.
- The students read it.
- *The students read the controversial it.

 Verb (V):
- refer to states of affairs and events
- express time, in most languages take a specific forms
corresponding to the time of the event
 EX English: walk expresses past by adding -ed
- express manner (aspect) of event, in many languages take a
specific form corresponding to the completedness of event.
 EX English: walk expresses ongoing action by adding -ing

Verbal Phrase (VP)
VP VP
V PP
V NP
P NP
Det N
Det N
trip on the bat

drop the ball [VP[V trip [PP[P on[NP[Det the[N bat]]]]
[VP [V drop NP[Det the][N ball]]]
 Evidence that VPs are syntactic units comes from the

fact they can often be replaced by the word(s) did (it).
- The catcher dropped the ball, and the pitcher did (it) too.

 Preposisions (P): Express roles

- Instrument
 EX Eng: with, He cut the bread with the knife
- Possessor
 EX Eng: of, Monday is the best day of the week.
- Spatial, directional and Temporal relations
 EX English: The food was on the table before it fell to the floor.

Prepositional Phrase
PP
P NP
Det N
in the park
 The substitution test confirms that PP is a unit since

it can be replaced by a single word like there.
- The team practiced in the park, and Lisa practised
there, too.
- *The team practiced in the park, and Lisa practised
there the park, too.

 Adjectjective (A):
- describe things that nouns refer to
- In English can be used in a sentence with the verb be:
 EX English: He is happy. They should be ripe.
- In English can be modified with degree adverbs:
 EX English: He is very happy. They should be completely ripe.
- In English have comparative form by adding -er:
 EX English: happi-er rip-er

Adjectival Phrases (AP)
AP
Adv A
very intelligent
[AP [Adv very] [A intelligent]]
 An adjectival phrase can be replaced by the word so.

- Linda is very intelligent, and Mark appears so too.
- * Linda is very intelligent, and Mark appears very so
too.

 Adverbs (Adv):
- Manner of action
 Ex Eng: quickly, He ran quickly.
- Attitude of speaker
 EX Eng: unfortunately, Unfortunately,he cut the bread.
- Temporal frequency
 EX Eng: soon, They’ll be here soon.
- Can be modified by “very” in English

Syntax definitions, cont.
Determiner: a closed set of morphemes that “specify”

nouns, indicating definiteness or indefiniteness.
Includes articles plus other morphemes (a, an, the
those, these, many,most, some)
Degree word: very, completely (type of adverb)

Lexical categories
Major Lexical Examples

categories Other Lexical Examples
categories
Noun (N) Pierre, butterfly Determiner The, this, these

(Det)
Auxiliary (Aux) Will, can, may
Verb (V) Arrive, discuss
Pronoun (Pro) He, she, her,
his
Adjective (A) Good, tall
Adverb (Adv) Yesterday,
silently
Preposition (P) To, in, near Conjunction And, or

(Con)

Head (of a phrase): The constituent fundamental to the

phrase, from which the phrase derives its name.
(e.g. a noun phrase is “headed” by a noun).
Each phrase (NP, VP, etc) is the projection of the
head.
NP is headed by N
VP is headed by V, etc.
Complement: The other constituents contained in the
phrase that complete its meaning is called
complements.

General Phrase Structure (XP)
XP
Spec X’
X (head) Comp
[XP [Spec] [ X’[X Comp]]]

 Key
Poin
ts
Spec=Specifier High
light
ed
Comp=Complement
X=N, V, A, P, etc.

More exercises: tree-diagram or
bracket the following the structures
 The teacher put the answers on the board

 He ran towards the red post
 Colorless green ideas sleep furiously
 John found a fly in the soup
 the young king who gave up his throne
 the man from the city in the little country from
Western Europe

Chomsky and UG
 Chomskyan revolution
 Universal Grammar (UG)
 A historical review of UG
 From PS rules to X-bar theory
 Parameters and Cross-linguistic Variation
 From Transformation to Movement
 UG and language acquisition

Chomskyan revolution
 Chomsky,
- has attracted worldwide attention with his ground-
breaking research into the nature of human language
and communication.
- has become the center of a debate that transcends
formal linguistics to embrace psychology, philosophy,
and even genetics.
- his "formulation of 'transformational grammar' has
been acclaimed as one of the major achievements of
the century.
- his work has been compared to the unraveling of the
genetic code of the DNA molecule."
- his discoveries have had an impact "on everything
from the way children are taught foreign languages to
what it means when we say that we are human."
- is also an impassioned critic of American foreign
policy, especially as it affects ordinary citizens of Third
World nations.
Central Claims
 Main features of TG Grammar

 Chomsky’s TG Grammar differs from the structural grammar in a
number of ways:
- (1) rationalism;
- (2) innateness;
- (3) deductive methodology;
- (4) formalization;
- (5) emphasis on linguistic competence;
- (6) strong generative powers;
- (7) emphasis on linguistic universals.


Universal Grammar
 Knowledge of Language
- Lexicon -Grammar
- Knowledge of words -Knowledge of rules
- Learned -Innate
- Language specific -Language Universal
 Universal Grammar
- The grammar which characterizes the innate
predisposition to learn language. UG is a set of
rules that all human possess by virtue of having
certain common genetic features which sitinguish
them from other species.

A historical review of UG
 50-60s
- Standard theory
- Extended Standard Theory
- Rule-based
 80s
- Government and Binding Theory
- Principle and Parameter Theory (PPT)
- Principle-guided
 90s
- Minimalism Program
- Economy-driven

Generative-Tranformational Grammar
 TG developed in the 1950s in the context of

“cognitive revolution”, which marked a shift
of focus from a concern with human
behaviour to the mental processes
underlying human behaviour.

Deep Structure and Surface Structure
PS-rules
Lexicon
Deep structure Semantic rules Semantic representation

representation
T-rules
Surface
Phonetic
Structure Phonological Rules
representation

Principle and Parameter Theory
 knowledge of language comprises a lexicon,

together with a set of innate principles (that
means, X-bar Theory, -Theory and Case
Theory, etc.) and set parameters.
 Principle and Parameter (P&P) approach
has proved fruitful for
- constraining the core of innate grammatical knowledge
(Pprinciples)
- defining the differences found between individual languages
(parameters)
- describing diachronic change (parameter resetting) and
- the investigation of first and second language acquisition
(parameter setting and resetting).
 .
Minimalism Program
 Central Claims
- Language is basically simple
- The working hypothesis is that there should not be
any redundant elements in a linguistic theory and
that the computational system of language (CHL)
operates optimally.
- CHL is so designed that its outputs are naturally
‘well-formed’ and ‘economical’.
 the minimisation of linguistic levels;
 the economy principles of derivation and
representation.

From PS-Rules to X-bar Theory
 PS-rules
- set up the general configurations of the phrasal
structures of a language
- the arragement of the elements that make up a
phrase
- Rewrite rules
 S NP VP
 NP (Det) N (PP)
 VP (Aux) V (NP)
 AP (Deg) A (PP)
 PP (Adv) P (NP)
 CP (Spec) C S
Tests of Phrase Structure
 Substitution
- The cow attacked him (the man with the gun)
- The cow attacked him (the man) with it (the gun)
- Q: Who attacked the man with a gun?
A: The cow did. (attacked the man with a gun)
What did he do?
Run up the hill and up the mountain.
*Ring up his mother and up his sister.
 Deletion
- The cow was planning to. (attack the man with the
gun)

Tests of phrase structures
 Movement
- The cow will attack whoever is in the field.
- Whoever is in the field, the cow will attack
- Who will the cow attack (the man with a gun)?
- Who will the cow attack (the man) with a gun?
- What will the cow attack the man with (the gun)?

Head (of a phrase): The constituent fundamental to the

phrase, from which the phrase derives its name.
(e.g. a noun phrase is “headed” by a noun).
Each phrase (NP, VP, etc) is the projection of the
head.
NP is headed by N
VP is headed by V, etc.
Complement: The other constituents contained in the
phrase that complete its meaning is called
complements.

Generalizing the rules
 S NP VP
 XP (Specifier) X (Complement)
- where X = {N, V, A, P, etc}
 Fundamental insight about the architecture of
sentence structrure:
- Sentences do not simply consist of word strings.
Rather, within any sentence, words are grouped
together to form phrases, which then combine
with each other to form still larger phrase.

General Phrase Structure –X’
category
XP  According to this
viewpoint, all phrases
have the tri-level
Spec X’ structures as shown in
the tree diagram, in
which the head and its
X (head) Comp
complement form an X’-
[XP [Spec] [ X’[X Comp]]]
level constituent and
the specifier is attached
Spec=Specifier at the higher XP level.
Comp=Complement  The existence of X’
X=N, V, A, P, etc. categories can be
X’’ = XP X’=X’ X0 = X
verified with the help of
the same sort of tests
© BTexact Technologies 2001 for phrase structure
S
S
NP VP
NP VP
Pron N’ V’ PP
Pron N VP PP
N V NP P’
V NP P N
Det N’ NP
Det N
N P N’


Adjuncts
NP
 Can be loosely defined Spec N’

as an extension of a
category Adjunct N’
- a big red car of his Adjunct N’
XP N Comp
Spec X’ a big red car of his
Adjunct X’
X’ Adjunct
X Comp

S
NP VP
Det N’ Aux V’
N N’ V’ PP
N V NP P’
Det N’ P N
`N
The fourth-year undergrads will leave the university in June.

More exercises: tree diagram the following
with tri-structure and explain the ill-
formedness of the starred sentences
 Mary’s solution to the problem

 *Mary’s the solution to the problem
 Mary’s latest solution to the problem
 the student of archeology from Canada
 the students from Canada and (from) the U.S
 *the student of archeology and from Canada
 *the student from Canada of archeology
 The man found a fly in the soup
 The lady found the man in blue jacket
NP
NP
Pron N’ Pron N’
A N’
N PP
P’ N PP
P’
P NP
P NP
Det N’
Det N
N N
Mary’s solution to the problem Mary’s latest solution to the problem
 The ill-formedness of the NP *Mary’s the solution to the

problem lies in the observation that both Mary’s and the
are candidate specifiers of solution but they can’t occupy
the [Spec] position of NP simultaneously.

NP

Det N’
N’ PP
N PP P’
P’ P NP
P NP N’
N’ N
the student of archeology from Canada
 the ungrammaticality of the NP *the student from Canada

of archeology lies in the fact that candidate compliment of
archeology can’t be adjacent to the head N and can’t
occupy the [Comp] position because of another PP from
Canada, which is more eligible as an adjunct.

NP
NP
Det N’
Det N’
N’ PP
N’ PP
P’
P’ Con P’
P NP
P NP P NP
NP Con NP
N’ Det N’ N’ Det N’
N N N N
the student from Canada and from the U.S the student from Canada and the U.S
 Note: the ungrammaticality of the NP *the student from canada and of

archeology can be verified by the observation the grammatical status of the
two PPs are different: while the PP of archeology is a candidate compliment
for the NP the student, the PP from Canada is more eligible for an Adjunct.
These two PPs functioning differently can’t be joined as a larger PP by the
conjunction word and.

S
S
NP VP
NP VP
Det N’ V’
Det N’ V’
V NP
V’ PP Det N’
V NP P’ N PP
P’`
Det N’ P NP
P NP
N Det N’
Det N’
N
N
The man found a fly in the soup The lady found fly in the plate
 These two sentences otherwise identical differ in

underlying structure in that the two PPs functions
differently, one as an adjunct of VP and the other as
a complement of NP, as illustrated in the tree
diagram.

Parameters and Cross-linguistic
variation
Principles: those aspects of syntactic
structures which are invariant across
languages
XP is the maximal projection of the head X.
Parameters: those aspects of structure which
vary from one language to another
head-first: English-type language
Kazu ate sushi, to Tokyo
head-last: Japanese-type language
Kazu sushi ate; Tokyo to.
 A head-first language applies the
headfirst rule to all of its phrases: NPs,
VPs, PPs. Everything.
Japanese English
XP
XP
Spec X’ Spec X’
Adjunct X’ Adjunct X’
X’ Adjunct X’ Adjunct
Comp X X Comp

IP
NP I’
N VP I
V’
CP V
C’
IP C V
NP I’
N’ VP I
V’
N’ V
Mary-ga Tom-ga hon-o yon da to omottei ru

Mary-S Tom-S book-DO read Past that think Present
Mary thinks that John read the book.

From transformation rules to
Movement
 Transformation rules: part of TG grammar,

functions to convert a surface structure to
deep structure
- I can solve this problem.
- This problem, I can solve. (Move)
- The dog chases the mouse.
- The mouse is chased by the dot (Move and Insert)
 Move alpha: Move any category anywhere.

Movement
 Head movement
- The movement of a word from the head position
of one phrase to the head position of another
phrase
 The president was lying
 Was the president – lying?
 Wh- movement
- The movement of an operator expression into the
specifier position within CP
 You can speak what languages
 What languages can you speak __?

Movement
CP
C’  The voters would

choose who
C IP
 Who would the voters
NP I’ __ choose __
I VP
V’
V NP

Movements are structurally dependent
 The man who kicked him escaped the

scene.
 Did the man who kicked him __ escape the
scene?
 * Did the man who ___ kick him escaped the
scene?

Movement are constrained
 The senator knew the voters would choose who

 The senator knew who the voters would choose__
 *The senator knew who would the voters choose__
 The man might wonder the detectives found whose
shoes at which house
 *Whose shoes might the man wonder which house
the detectives found__ at__?
 *Which house might the man wonder whose shoe the
detectives found __at__ ?
- NP and an embedded S containing a wh-phrase
appear to create islands.

UG and Language Acquisition
 Logical Problem: is our knowledge of grammar given,

or learned? Nature vs. nurture
 Learning the grammar = setting the parameters. Our
competence in syntax is given in part by UG, in part
by parameters defined by UG. The parameters are
set in the process of language acquisition on the
basis of exposure to a particular language
- switchbox
- Traffic rules

Parameters
[+] [value] Language A
Principle
[-] [value] Language B

The notion of modularity
•Language module •Central Processes
•UG •Grammar •Memory

•Belief
•Pragmatics
•Language •Langauge
•Learning •Real-word Knowledge
•Parser
•principles •Problem-solving abilities
•Perceptual module
•vision, hearing, etc.

UG and L2 acquisition
UG Other mental faculties
direct access no access
L1 L2
indirect access

Linguistic Ettiquetteppt

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Linguistic Ettiquetteppt

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Syntax

A Review of General Language Etiquette

Original Draft, Wu Hepen, Northwest Normal School

© BTexact Technologies 2001

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 Syntax: the study of the structure of

© BTexact Technologies 2001

© BTexact Technologies 2001

Traditional Grammar and the prescriptive

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 Descriptive rules are more general and more

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 Grammar is a collection of rules concerning

 Rules of descriptive grammar have the status of

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 An ungrammatical sentence is conventionally

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 Rules of etiquette or laws of

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 Grammar as a form of internal linguistic

© BTexact Technologies 2001

- Universality: a theory of grammar should provide us with

© BTexact Technologies 2001

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 Descriptive linguistics is the study and analysis of spoken language. The

© BTexact Technologies 2001

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 The basic concern of the descriptive approach is to investigate the

 IC analysis is designed to show how small constituents in a sentence

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 Colorless green ideas sleep furiously

© BTexact Technologies 2001

My parents bought two tickets at Christmas

[S[NP [Pron my][N parents]]VP[VP[V bought]NP[Det two][N tickets]]PP[P at] [N Christmas]]]]

 Three aspects of a speaker’s syntactic knowledge are

 A family of expressions that can substitute for one

© BTexact Technologies 2001

© BTexact Technologies 2001

© BTexact Technologies 2001

the student the controversial book it

© BTexact Technologies 2001

© BTexact Technologies 2001

trip on the bat

 Evidence that VPs are syntactic units comes from the

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 Preposisions (P): Express roles

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 The substitution test confirms that PP is a unit since

© BTexact Technologies 2001

© BTexact Technologies 2001

 An adjectival phrase can be replaced by the word so.

© BTexact Technologies 2001

© BTexact Technologies 2001

Determiner: a closed set of morphemes that “specify”

© BTexact Technologies 2001

Major Lexical Examples

Noun (N) Pierre, butterfly Determiner The, this, these

Preposition (P) To, in, near Conjunction And, or

© BTexact Technologies 2001

Head (of a phrase): The constituent fundamental to the

© BTexact Technologies 2001

[XP [Spec] [ X’[X Comp]]]

© BTexact Technologies 2001