Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
• Hong Kong International Theme Parks Ltd (HKTP): an entity jointly owned by
The Walt Disney Company and the Hong Kong government
• HKTP awarded Chase Manhattan Bank the mandate to lead a HK$3.3 bn bank
financing for the construction of the HK$14 bn HKTP and resort complex
• Disney chose Chase because of its global leadership in syndicated finance and
its firm commitment to underwrite the full loan amount
• Chase responsible for raising the funds regardless of how the bank market
reacted to the deal
Introduction: Case (2/2)
• Chase HQs in NY, but HK office responsible for executing the deal
• Deliver a syndication that met both the bank market’s expectations for
participation levels and credit quality , and the sponsor’s desire for a rapid
closing with a supportive bank group
• Alternatives:
– General Syndication
– 2-stage Syndication, with a sub-underwriting prior to prior to general
syndication
• Decide:
– Banks to invite
– Allocation of fees and titles
– Loan to retain on B/S
Introduction: Hong Kong (1/2)
• 150 years as a British Colony
• Economy:
– Based on services, tourism and international trade
– Few natural resources; relatively high labour costs
• Recession:
– Thai currency crisis 1997
– Unemployment rate more than doubled
– GDP fell for the first time in 20 years
– Stock market crashed
– Tentative recovery by mid-1999
– Decline in o/p remained a subject of public concern
• Business Segments:
1. Theme Parks and Resorts
2. Media Networks
3. Studio Entertainment
4. Consumer Products
5. Internet/Direct Marketing
• 7 Theme parks (+4 in the works), 27 hotels with 36,888 rooms, 2 cruise
ships, 728 Disney stores, 1 broadcast n/w, 10 TV stations, 9
international Disney channels, 42 radio stations, 1 internet portal, 5
major internet websites, interests in 9 US cable networks, and a library
containing thousands of animated and live films and TV episodes.
Introduction: The Walt Disney Company (2/2)
• Theme Parks and Resorts segment
– Company owned and operated the original Disneyland in Anaheim,
California and the Walt Disney World resort complex in Orlando,
Florida
– US and Tokyo parks successful
– Earned fees & royalties on Tokyo Disneyland(1983) and Disneyland
Paris(1992)
• Development strategy:
– Learning from our experience with Disneyland Paris [a deal that experienced
financial problems shortly after opening], the strategy for Hong Kong was to
start small and then to add capacity over time as demand grew.
– In fact, Phase I included plans to double capacity within the first ten years of
operations. The real keys to success are having the land available for growth
and the ability to finance this growth out of operating cash flow.
Introduction: Hong Kong Disneyland (2/5)
• Because most of the construction site was currently ocean, the
sponsors had to reclaim land.
• This left a shortfall of HK $2.3 billion (16% of total capital), which the HK
Govt. hoped to fill with some kind of external finance.
• Inclusion of private sector financing would not only show that the project
was viable in the eyes of the international banking community, but would
also provide independent oversight of construction as well as monitoring
of ongoing operations.
• Its fear, given the recent volatility in the Asian banking market, was
that if it waited until 2002, it might not be able to get a loan, never
mind a loan with attractive pricing.
Winning the Mandate
• Disney Deal Team for HK$3.3 bn financing:
– VP, Corporate Finance and assistant treasurer
– Director, Corporate Finance
– Manager, Corporate Finance
– Senior Analyst, Corporate Finance
– VP and Counsel
• Not the market leader in all loan types or all locations but a
formidable competitor in most markets, including Asia
• Although Disney was an important global client, the deal did not seem
that attractive to Chase initially. It had a long tenor (15 years) which banks
don’t like, it had to contend with the problems at Disneyland Paris, the
sponsors wanted to mandate as many as 3 lead arrangers which hurts its
economics, and its competitors, especially the local banks like Bank of
China and Hong Kong Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC), were likely to
bid aggressively
• And so, it decided to bid less aggressively without fear of losing. Yet to
protect its reputation, it wanted to bid aggressively enough to make the
short list for this high-profile deal. If it happened to win the mandate, it
would have to be on terms that met our earnings thresholds
Making the Short List (2/2)
• Disney Finance Team met Chase and 16 other banks in HK to review:
– Key loan terms including the pricing (an unknown)
– Amount (HK$3.3 bn)
– Maturity (15 years)
– Covenants
• Although Chase expected ultimately to bid to lose, it agreed that the deal
would be much more attractive if Disney chose to award a sole lead
arranger mandate.
• Disney shortlisted 5 banks for the mandate and asked them to submit
final proposal: Chase, HSBC, Bank of China, ABN Amro, Citi Bank, and Fuji
Bank.
Preparing the Final Proposal (1/8)
• Chase had to assess:
– Loan’s credit risk
– Decide whether to underwrite the full amount
– Commit to an underwriting fee and interest rate spread
– Develop a preliminary syndication strategy
• Its fee might be on the high end, but it didn’t feel bad about this for 2
reasons:
– It was not afraid to lose this deal on up-front pricing— it cared about deal
quality and profitability, not deal volume.
– Second, if properly marketed, borrowers viewed the up-front fees in terms of
their annual cost, not the nominal first-year cost.
Preparing the Final Proposal (5/8)
Syndication Process:
Option# 1:
• Chase would be the sole mandated lead arranger
• Would invite 4 banks to act as sub-underwriters with lead arranger titles
in exchange for commitments of HK$660 mn
• The final allocations in the general syndication for the reqd. total of $3.3
bn would be:
– Chase and the 4 lead arrangers at HK$300 mn each
– 4 arrangers at HK$250 mn each
– 4 co-arrangers at HK$150 mn each
– and 2 lead managers at HK$100 mn
• Advantages:
– Administrative simplicity: Disney to deal with only 1 lead bank
– Reduced underwriting risk for Chase
– Possibly easier syndication given the sub-underwriter support
Preparing the Final Proposal (6/8)
Syndication Process:
Option# 2:
• Chase and 2 other banks would share a joint mandate and a joint
underwriting commitment, but they would skip the sub-underwriting
phase
• The mandated banks (coordinating arrangers) would each underwrite
HK$1.1 bn of the total amount and split the underwriting fee 3 ways
• Based on its analysis for the Disney deal, they expected it would be
oversubscribed by 57%. This kind of analysis illustrated its closeness
to the market and its confidence in the deal.
Arranging the Loan (1/)
• Disney chose Chase because:
– its pricing was competitive,
– it agreed to underwrite the full amount,
– and they showed a high degree of flexibility on structuring, particularly their
willingness to permit ongoing capital expenditures without burdensome
covenants.
• Having won the sole mandate, Chase met with Disney to negotiate a
commitment letter with final terms, discuss the syndication strategy, and
map out a syndication timetable. As with any legal document, the content
of a formal commitment letter invariably required negotiation. From
experience, Chase knew its standard “market flex” provision was likely to
be one source of contention.
– Chase was the pioneer in the use of market flex terms. It makes good
business sense to include this clause, even though our competitors
sometimes use it against us in competitive mandates, because things
can change between the time you sign a deal and the time you try to
close it.
– But to date, Chase had never invoked the market flex clause in Asia.
Nor did it invoke the MAC clause, even during the Asian financial crisis
of 1997-1999, and it told this to clients.
Arranging the Loan (3/)
• After agreement on the final terms and commitment letter signed, Chase
had to select a syndication strategy.
• Disney requested that some of the short-list banks and some other strong
banks that did not participate in the bidding have senior status. Disney
also wanted to keep the final bank group down to a manageable size.
• They didn’t want the syndicate to get too big and let the
commitments get too small; they did want to give interested banks
a chance to participate