on
• To explain the method, only walls A and B are considered in the calculation; hence wind blowing
from either north or south direction is critical and evaluated. In the east-west direction the
cavity and corridor walls provide the resistance to wind loading. In an actual design, the
designer must of course check that the structure is safe for wind blowing east-west and vice
versa.
• In the calculation below, it has further been assumed that the walls act as independent
cantilevers; and hence moments or forces are apportioned according to their stiffness.
Wind loads
These are calculated according to CP 3, Chapter V: Part 2. We have
VS = V S1 S2 S3
S1= S3 = 1 ; Using ground roughness category 3, Class B, with height of the building=21.0m, from
Table 3, CP3, Chapter V: Part 2 S2 = 0.91
Therefore design wind speed VS = 50 x 1x 0.91 x 1 = 45.5 m/sec.
And dynamic wind pressure q = 0.613 x (45.5)2 = 1269.0 N/m2
From clause 7.3, CP3,Chapter v: Part 2,Total wind force F= Cf q Ae (Cf = 1.1,Table 10)
Ae = Effective surface area
•6th floor
Cf q Ae × h/2 = 1.1×(1269/103) × 21 × 3 × 3/2 = 131.9 kN m
•5th floor
1.1×(1269/103) × 21 × 6 × 3 = 527.6 kN m
•4th floor
• (1.1×1269×21/103)× 9× 9/2 = 1187.20 kN m
•3rd floor
29.313 × (12×12/2) = 2110.54 kN m
•2nd floor
29.313×(15×15/2) = 3297.70 kN m
•1st floor
29.313×(18×18/2)=4748.71kNm
•ground floor
1.1×(1269/103)× 21 × 21× 21/2 = 6463.2 kN m
In the calculation the factor S2 has been kept constant (Fig. 3), which means the design will be a bit
conservative. However, the reader/researcher can vary the S2 factor as given in Fig. 3 taken from
Table 3 (CP:3) which means the wind speed will be variable depending on the height of the building.
Fig. 3:The variation of the factor S2 and the wind velocity along the height of the building.
(Assumptions made in the design shown in full lines.)
Assumed section of wall resisting the wind moment
The flange which acts together with the web of I-section is the lesser of
12 times thickness of flange + thickness of web
centre line to centre line of walls
one-third of span ( 1.41 m) taken it as 1.34 m
(a) Wall A
For wall A (Fig. 4), neglecting the outer skin of the cavity wall flange, the second moment of area is
•IA = 2* {( 0.1025)3 x 1.34/12} + {0.1025 x1.34 x (2.07)2} + {(4.045)2 x 0.1025 /12 }
= 1.169 x 0.565 = 1.734 m4
Leeward side
Dead + wind = 1.4Gk+1.4Wk
Stress ={ ( 28 x 103 )/(102.5 x 103) } + (1.4 x 0.01) = 0.287 N/mm2
No tension develops,hense safe
For the ground floor
• There is no need to check at any other level, since shear is not a problem for this type of
structure.
• The BS 5628 recommends gA as the design vertical load per unit area of wall cross-section due to
vertical load calculated from the appropriate loading condition specified in clause 22. The critical
condition of shear will be with no imposed load just after and during the construction.
5. Calculation of eccentricity
•The worst combination of loading for obtaining the value of e at top of the wall is shown in Fig. 6.
Axial load
P =(0.9×78.54+1.6×7.29) (Gk and Qk from Table 2)
•=(70.69+11.66)=82.35kN/m
First floor load
P1=(1.4×6.48+1.6×2.025) (see Table 12.2)
•=12.31kN/m
Fig. 12.6 Load combination for calculating the eccentricity.
Eccentricity
(BM coefficient for four-sided simply supported panel is 0.104; table 3.1, BS:8110)
BM/leaf = 964.6/2 = 482.3 Nm per m
( Since both leaves are of same stiffness)
e centre = (482.3 x 103/94.66 x 103) = 5.1 mm
P + P1 = 94.66 Kn/m
Resultant = ecc = (2.22/2) + 5.1 = 6.21 mm = 0.06 t
• b) Wind blowing west-east direction
The panel B is not only subjected to dead and imposed loads, but also subjected to wind loading from
west to east direction. Then
The bending moment induced due to wind loading acts against those due to the vertical load).
• Since resultant eccentricity of case (b) is greater than case (a), case (b) eccentricity is considered
in the design.
• b) Wind blowing west-east direction
The panel B is not only subjected to dead and imposed loads, but also subjected to wind loading from
west to east direction. Then
The bending moment induced due to wind loading acts against those due to the vertical load).
• Since resultant eccentricity of case (b) is greater than case (a), case (b) eccentricity is considered
in the design.
Calculation of characteristic compressive stress fk for wall B (inner leaf)
Design of the outer leaf of the cavity wall B in GF
Load combination:Windward side
The design is similar to the inner leaf and will not be considered any further. The slight tension
which is developing is of no consequence, since 6 to 10% of the dead and imposed load will be
transferred to the outer leaf even in cases where the slab is supported on the inner skin. The
staircase and lift well will also provide the stability against the wind which has been neglected.
However, any facing brick having water absorption between 7 and 12% in 1:¼:3 mortar may be
used, provided that it satisfies the lateral load design. The grade of mortar is kept the same as
for the inner leaf.
Idealized structure for vertical load design
Idealized structure for wind load design
Thank You !