his Wealth of Nation and ended when W. Stanley Jevons, Carl Menger and Leon Walras published works on neoclassical theories Two revolutions were significance to the classical thought (1) Scientific revolution and (2) Industrial revolution Scientific Revolution • In 1687 Isaac Newton (1642 –1727) greatly advanced Kepler’s earlier scientific laws of motion and Galileo’s mathematical laws of movement of bodies on earth. • The revolution had three major merit 1. Scientists relied heavily on experimental evidence 2. Newton popularized the already existing idea that the universe is governed by natural laws 3. Newton system was static view of the universe • This had impact the classical thought where the restrictive controls of mercantilism were no longer necessary. • Created a mechanism that worked harmoniously and automatically without interference. • Natural laws would guide the economic system and the action of people • Society would be best served if people were free to follow the natural law of self interest Industrial Revolution • In 1776 England as the most industrially efficient and powerful country in the world, benefited form free international trade • As the entrepreneurs become stronger, they no longer had to rely on government subsidy, monopoly privileges and tariff protection • Free, mobile, low paid and hardworking labor force also emerged Major Tenets
1. Minimal government involvement
• Free competitive market would guide production, exchange and distribution • Self adjusting and tending toward full employment 2. Self-interested economic behavior • Self-interest where producers and merchants provided goods and services to make profits, workers for wages and consumers purchase products to satisfy their wants 3. Harmony of interests • By pursuing their own individual interests, people served the best interests of society 4. Importance of all economic resources & activities • Classical pointed out resources (land, labor, capital and entrepreneurial ability) and economic activities (agriculture, commerce, production and international trade) contribute to the nation’s wealth 5. Economic laws • Focus on explicit economic theories, law of comparative advantage, law of diminishing return and others Whom Did Benefit?
Served all society because its theories
promoted capital accumulation and economic growth
Ultimately benefited owners of businesses
Which Became Lasting?
Laid the foundation of modern economics as
a social science such as; – Law of diminishing return – Law of comparative advantage – Consumer sovereignty – Importance of capital accumulation – Importance of market mechanism Sir Dudley North (1641 – 1691)
Called as the world’s first free trader
Trade is a mutual advantage Wealth should not be measured by a country’s stock of precious metals Argued for laissez-faire Disagreed with the mercantilist concept that war and conquest enrich a country Richard Cantillon (1680 – 1743)
Born in Ireland but spent life in Paris
In 1734, he was robbed and murdered Published his only book, Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en General in French, 1755 Predated physiocrats:- 1. First used the term entrepreneur 2. Writing before Quesnay published Tableau Economique Cantillon’s Contribution Attempted to reduce economics to a few elementary principles. Emphasis on monetary concerns. Concept of equilibrium across markets. Mechanical linkages across economic elements, driven by individuals pursuing self-interest. Motivated by Newton’s writings on mechanics in physics. Modern method. Land is Source of Wealth
Cantillon was aware that a country’s total
production depends on both land and labor. But the availability of labor depends on the availability of land and therefore, cannot be considered an independent source of a nation’s wealth. Without adequate land, the labor force will either starve to death or be forced to migrate. Therefore, a nation’s prosperity depends only on its endowment of land. This idea was further developed by the Physiocrats. Macroeconomic Theory Cantillon constructed a macroeconomic theory:- • By imagining an economy with two sectors— agriculture and manufacturing • Three social classes—landowners, entrepreneurs and hired workers Describing how the output of each sector ends up distributed among the three social classes as their consumption and among the two sectors as their raw materials. Cantillon’s analysis amounts to the circular flow of income model that almost every economics textbook of today starts out with. The notion that income equals expenditure or that each person earns what others must have spent is clear in Cantillon’s description. Monetary Theory In Cantillon’s monetary theory, the purchasing power of money (that is, the value of money) does not change when the quantity of money changes. In Cantillon’s time, money consisted of gold and silver coins. This is called commodity money. Since gold is a commodity like any other commodity, its value is measured by the amount of land embodied in the production of a unit of gold As long as the way gold is produced does not change, its value in terms of land cannot change and therefore its purchasing power (measured in terms of the amount of any good that a gold coin can buy) cannot change. Eventually the economy would reach the limit of what it was able to produce. When that point is reached, the increased spending by those who have the newly mined gold would simply drive up prices This would reduce exports and increase imports. The resulting trade deficit would be accompanied by an outflow of gold to foreign countries. In the long run, the additional gold that was discovered would simply flow out of the country and the value or purchasing power of gold (that is, money) would return to its original level. This result is a version of the price specie-flow mechanism that David Hume (1711-1776) later became famous for. David Hume (1711-1776) Hume entered the University of Edinburgh at 12 and left at 15 Refused a chair in philosophy because his skeptical spirit and unorthodox thinking Hume accepted John Locke’s quantity theory of money (the price level is determined by the quantity of money available, given the velocity and quantity of output) Hume condemned on John Law’s disastrous schemes: in the long run money does not raise output and increase the number of jobs, it only raises prices and in the same proportion as the increase in the quantity of money. Price Specie-Flow Mechanism Mercantilists failed to state whether the monetary stimulus applied in the short run or the long run and Hume made it clear that that effect existed only in the short run and was completely absent in the long run Hume also criticized the mercantilist view that an increase in the quantity of money reduced interest rates saying that the effect evaporates in the long run. Hume’s doctrine that changes in the quantity of money affect nominal variables but not real variables is known as monetary neutrality. Hume addressed the issue of money by likening money to grease that makes a wheel turn smoother Hume also gave a clear description of the specie flow mechanism. Cantillon had explained this much earlier, but Cantillon’s book was published after Hume had published his analysis.