Testing by Microcontroller Bowen, B.E., & Agnew, D.M. Research Title
This study shows the consequences between
the microcomputer instruction and lecture- discussion in teaching college students. Hence, there is a limited research about the effects of microcomputers on learning in the cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains. Statement of the Problem
The problem statements have the same way of
thinking with the title and seemed to be instructional content. The challenge was doubted visible to the average reader. And it required several readings to begin or create something that is meant to last for a long time. It was bounded to the researcher’s capabilities and that provides something useful. Objectives of the Study
The author’s objectives were required to
explain or justify one’s action. And they chose to acquire them by testing null hypotheses. These hypotheses were able to be tested and perform duties and services to help explain the problem. Methodology
The treatment act according to the post-
test only control group design. Consequently, the study was taking part of reproducing something. Replications were conducted during a State University course. A two stage proceeding assignment was used in assigning groups and treatments Review of Related Literature
The author cited no clear review of
literature. However, several appropriate source of information were able to use for practical purpose in the introduction section. Summary and Conclusion Summary There was no summary given. Conclusions Conclusions and implications were formulated with the knowledge that subjects for this study used micro technology extensively during a computer applications course. In this investigation, final examination scores were independent of the method of testing. Hypothesis of the Study Hypothesis one: A one way analysis of covariance revealed that the two groups were not worth considering different in terms of their scores on the 35 item final examination. Hypothesis two: The mean attitudinal scores of the two groups were positive in both replications, and there was no significant difference in the two groups’ attitudes about computers. Hypothesis three: There was a sufficient difference in minutes required to complete the exam in replication one; however, there was no significant difference in replication two. Recommendations
The recommendations were limited to a call for
additional research in the area. For the most part, it was well written and well organized. There was a definite need for a short review of literature to develop the situation. The article did get a little complicated in the reporting of data due to the complicated statistical procedures used. Overall, it was a very interesting, significant contribution to the field of research.