100%(1)100% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (1 Abstimmung)
37 Ansichten17 Seiten
This document discusses integrity due diligence (IDD), which involves investigating third parties to understand corruption and integrity risks. IDD is important for risk management and making better investment decisions. It involves gathering public records and expert interviews to develop a risk profile of the third party. Key areas of focus include political connections, regulatory interactions, allegations of wrongdoing, and ties to criminal groups. IDD is conducted in phases and is important for compliance, combating financial crimes, and strategic decision making. While an extra step, IDD provides legal and reputational protection for companies.
This document discusses integrity due diligence (IDD), which involves investigating third parties to understand corruption and integrity risks. IDD is important for risk management and making better investment decisions. It involves gathering public records and expert interviews to develop a risk profile of the third party. Key areas of focus include political connections, regulatory interactions, allegations of wrongdoing, and ties to criminal groups. IDD is conducted in phases and is important for compliance, combating financial crimes, and strategic decision making. While an extra step, IDD provides legal and reputational protection for companies.
This document discusses integrity due diligence (IDD), which involves investigating third parties to understand corruption and integrity risks. IDD is important for risk management and making better investment decisions. It involves gathering public records and expert interviews to develop a risk profile of the third party. Key areas of focus include political connections, regulatory interactions, allegations of wrongdoing, and ties to criminal groups. IDD is conducted in phases and is important for compliance, combating financial crimes, and strategic decision making. While an extra step, IDD provides legal and reputational protection for companies.
Agenda What is IDD Why it is needed Talking points Methodology Focal points Phases of IDD The Strategic Dimension Legislation(s) Is there any choice? Conclusion Integrity Due Diligence (“IDD”) is the gathering of independent information to gain an understanding of the integrity and corruption risks associated with a third party. It provides companies with a means to both identify these risks and confirm (or otherwise) information provided to them by a third party. https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/financial-advisory/s olutions/third-party-integrity-due- diligence.html
integrity due diligence is the act of investigating the
counterparty with whom you are doing business – whether they are employees, board members, agents or representatives, customers, suppliers, JV partners or acquisition targets. http://www.garancie.com/integrity-due-diligence/what-is-inte grity-due- Why it is needed?
“The Days of thinking that suppliers who do
unethical or illegal things can’t hurt you are over. You can, and will, be held responsible for the people working for you in the supply chain, whether you like it or not.” Why it is needed? Globalization Use of technology Why it is needed?
To improve risk management in the broadest sense
and to support better decisions on new investments and partnerships in all forms, including acquisitions, joint ventures, minority investments, strategic cooperation agreements or supplier-, distributor- or local agent relationships. Talking points Case of VW and Tesco Domestic companies Methodology for IDD
Secondary records available in public domain
(includes National and International Media) Interview of experts to confirm the information
This leads to development of risk profile
Focal points Major focal points in this phase of the investigation include: The existence of any connections between the business and any political figures, as well as how the company interacts with regulators, government entities, etc. The nature and strength of any such connections and whether any of those connections have been leveraged for the benefit of the company The extent, nature and credibility of any allegations made against the company or its key principals relating to bribery, corruption, money laundering, large-scale tax evasion, fraud or asset stripping Any alleged connections between the company and organized crime or terrorist groups or broader risk of exposure to such groups Phases of IDD The Strategic Dimension
Passed due-diligence checks without concern.
Further action or investigation is required. Area failed due-diligence checks. Legislation(s) Is there any choice?
substantial legal penalties
reputational damage litigation exposure and financial losses through fraud.
Understanding the risks of doing business and
learning how to prevent or mitigate these risks — is vital to informed, effective transaction decisions. Conclusion Corporations and institutions can attain a strategic and competitive advantage by pursuing an integrated approach to integrity due diligence. By assessing the trustworthiness and reliability of customers, business partners and any third parties, organizations ensure the fulfillment of compliance requirements, whilst concurrently facilitating a concerted effort to combat money laundering, fraud and corruption.
integrity due diligence is an essential risk prevention
and risk mitigation tool which will add value to any strategic decision making process. Dr. Onkar Nath dronkar@yahoo.com
CISSP(USA), CISA(USA), CISM(USA), CloudU
CFE(USA),CNSM(India), CAIIB(India),IPIAM(USA), CCSK, IDLA(USA), ISO 27001 LA, ISO 22301 LA, BS 25999 LA, M. Sc.(Maths.), PGDCM, PGDHRD, PGDIM, PGDMM, PGDFM, MBA (HR), Ph.D.(P.U, India), Ph.D. (AMSE, France), FRAS(UK), FAMSE(France), FUWAI(India) Thank You