Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AGENDA
• Importance of Facility Location.
– Centroid Methods
– Economic Analysis.
– Factors Rating Analysis.
– Transportation Method (Mathematical
Programming Methods).
– Locating Service Facilities
AGENDA
• Importance of Facility Location.
• Costs include..
Land, Labor, RM, SCM
Causes that compel Location decision
• An expanding market.
Access to market/materials
Material Cost
Labor Cost and Availability
Community Taxes
Availability of public services
Availability of sites
Community amenities
• Centroid Method
• Economic Analysis
• Transportation Method
Xcg coordinate
li x i
Ycg coordinate
li y i
li li
Where:
xi = x-coordinate of location i.
yi = y-coordinate of location i.
li = quantity (load) of goods moved to/from location i.
The Center of Gravity Approach
• This approach requires that the analyst find the center of gravity of the
geographic area being considered
Xc.g.
lX
i i
325
7.9 ; Yc.g.
l Y
i i
436
10.6
l i 41 l i 41
Four Factories
Delhi (15,40) 15
Kolkata (40,30) 10
Chennai (30,5) 20
(24,24)
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Response Time 1 week-> 1 Distribution Center
Clientes
Centro
distribución
Response Time 5 days-> 2 Distribution Center
Clientes
Centro
distribución
Response Time 3 days-> 5 Distribution Center
Clientes
Centro
distribución
Response Time 1 day-> 13 Distribution Center
Clientes
Centro
distribución
Same Day Response --> 26 Distribution Centers
Customer
DC
Response time vs. Number of facilities
Response
Time
Number of Facilities
Cost vs Number of Facilities
Optimum
Number Total Costs
(Inv, Trans, Labor)
Percent Service
Cost of Operations
Level Within
Promised Time
Facilities
Inventory
Transportation
Labor
Number of Facilities
Economic Analysis
Locational Break-Even Analysis Example
e
st curv
co
nai
Annual cost (Rs)
en
Ch
t
c os
l k a ta v e
Ko cur
i
ba ve
um cur
M t
s
coMumbai Chennai
Kolkata lowest
lowest lowest
cost
cost cost
| | | | | | |
Volume
Factor-Rating Method
• Popular because a wide variety of factors can be
included in the analysis
• Six steps in the method
– Develop a list of relevant factors called critical
success factors
– Assign a weight to each factor
– Develop a scale for each factor
– Score each location for each factor
– Multiply score by weights for each factor for
each location
– Recommend the location with the highest point
score
Factor-Rating Example
Critical Scores
Success (out of 100) Weighted Scores
Factor Weight Mumbai Delhi Mumbai Delhi
Labor
availability
and attitude .25 70 60 (.25)(70) = 17.5 (.25)(60) = 15.0
People-to
car ratio .05 50 60 (.05)(50) = 2.5 (.05)(60) = 3.0
Per capita
income .10 85 80 (.10)(85) = 8.5 (.10)(80) = 8.0
Tax structure .39 75 70 (.39)(75) = 29.3 (.39)(70) = 27.3
Education
and health .21 60 70 (.21)(60) = 12.6 (.21)(70) = 14.7
Total 1.00 70.4 68.0
ree
Factor-Rating Exampleom th
f r
ny
Critical Scores pa t
Success (out of 100) om gh Scores
Weighted
Factor Weight France Denmark r C ei
France Denmark
u
o nd w
Labor y
r a
availability T fo rs
n to
and attitude .25 70 EN60 tio (.25)(70)
a c = 17.5 (.25)(60) = 15.0
People-to N M c ef a
I G l o at
car ratio .05 50
S S e a 60pri (.05)(50) = 2.5 (.05)(60) = 3.0
Per capita A o s ro
income
P ho pp 80
.10 OU 85 (.10)(85) = 8.5 (.10)(80) = 8.0
c a
Tax structure .39GR hod 75ith 70 (.39)(75) = 29.3 (.39)(70) = 27.3
Education et ns w
and health i s m tio 60
.21 70 (.21)(60) = 12.6 (.21)(70) = 14.7
t h o p
Totals n 1.00
g le 70.4 68.0
s i ib
U ss
po
TRANSPORTATION METHOD
Transportation models deals with the transportation of a
product manufactured at different plants or factories (supply
origins (O)) to a number of different warehouses (demand
destinations (D) ).
The objective is to satisfy the destination requirements within
the plant’s capacity constraints at the minimum
transportation cost. Transportation models thus typically arise
in situations involving physical movement of goods from
plants to warehouses, warehouses to wholesalers,
wholesalers to retailers and retailers to customers. Solution of
the transportation models requires the determination of how
many units should be transported from each supply origin to
each demand destination, in order to satisfy all the
destination demands while minimising the total associated
cost of transportation
Consider a soft drink manufacturing
firm, which has m plants located in m
different cities. The total production is to
be supplied to the retail shops in ‘n’
different cities. We want to determine
the transportation schedule that
minimizes the total cost of transporting
soft drinks from various plants to various
retail shops. This situation can be
formulated as a linear programming
problem.
Let us consider the m-plant locations
(origins) as O1, O2… Om and the n-
retail markets (destination) as D1, D2…
Dn respectively.
n Available
igi
D D1 D2 D3 D4………………..Dn at Oj
n
O
O1 a1
O2 a2
O3 a3
…
… ---
---
… am
Om
Amt reqd
at Dj b1 b2 b3 b4 ……………..bn
Let the cost of
transporting one unit of
soft drink from ith origin
to jth destination be Cij,
i= 1, 2 ….m, j=1, 2….n.
De
sti Amount
na
tio
Or
n Available
igi
D D1 D2 D3 D4………………..Dn at Oj
n
O
O2 a2
C21 C22 C23 C24………………..C2n
Amt reqd
at Dj b1 b2 b3 b4 ……………..bn
If Xij ≥ 0 be the amount
of soft drink to be
transported from ith
origin to jth destination
De TRANSPORTATION METHOD
sti Amount
na
tio
Or
n Available
igi
D
at Oj
n
D1 D2 D3 D4………………..Dn
O
O2 a2
C21 C22 C23 C24 …………… C2n
(x21) (x22) (x23) (x24)………………(x2n)
n Available
igi
D
at Oj
n
D1 D2 D3 D4………………..Dn
O
O2 a2
C21 C22 C23 C24 …………… C2n
(x21) (x22) (x23) (x24)………………(x2n)
n Available
igi
D
at Oj
n
D1 D2 D3 D4………………..Dn
O
O2 a2
C21 C22 C23 C24 …………… C2n
(x21) (x22) (x23) (x24)………………(x2n)
n Available
igi
D D1 D2 D3 D4………………..Dn at Oj
n
O
O2 a2
C21 C22 C23 C24 …………… C2n
(x21) (x22) (x23) (x24)………………(x2n)
n Available
igi
D D1 D2 D3 D4………………..Dn at Oj
n
O
O2 a2
C21 C22 C23 C24 …………… C2n
(x21) (x22) (x23) (x24)………………(x2n)
n Available
igi
D D1 D2 D3 D4………………..Dn at Oj
n
O
O2 a2
C21 C22 C23 C24 …………… C2n
(x21) (x22) (x23) (x24)………………(x2n)
n Available
igi
D D1 D2 D3 D4………………..Dn at Oj
n
O
O2 a2
C21 C22 C23 C24 …………… C2n
(x21) (x22) (x23) (x24)………………(x2n)
• Optimal Solution :
• A feasible solution (not basically basic) is said to be optimal if it minimises
the total transportation cost.
AGENDA
Importance of Facility Location.
• Market affects the number of sites to be built and the size and
characteristics of the sites.
Fire Safety
DESIGN…….Systems…….. Electricity
Lighting
Water, Sanitation etc
……Handling Systems
Objective of Facility Planning..GPI
TECHNOLOGY GOVT
C
U
S Optimize relationship
T within the organisation
O
M
E Suppliers
R Vendors ENVIRONMENT
S
Otimize relationship
With outside factors
To satisfy
customers
MAIN FEATURES of FACILITIES…GPI
• Flexibility …….Handle variety of reqts w/o alteration