Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.oilgascourse.com 1
Course Objective
1. Untuk mengetahui&memahami tentang Basic
Components pada Control System & Parameters
2. Untuk mengetahui&memahami tentang Pressure
Measurement,Temperature Measurement&Flow
Measurement
3. Untuk mengetahui&memahami tentang Control Valve
Classification
4. Untuk mengetahui&memahami tentang Flow
Characteristics&Leakage Classifications
5. Untuk mengetahui&memahami tentang Analytical
Measurement
6. Untuk mengetahui&memahami tentang Control Loop
Hardware
7. Untuk mengetahui&memahami tentang Process Safety
Control
www.oilgascourse.com 2
Instrumentation and
control
Instrumentation and control system is designed
for minimum local manning and operator
attention.
Controller
• The Brain or Heart Of the control system (the decision
maker).
• It is the hardware element with Built-in capacity for
performing the only task requiring some forms of
Intelligence.
• Typical examples:
Electronic controllers, digital computers used as controller.
www.oilgascourse.com 4
BASIC COMPONENTS OF A
CONTROL SYSTEM
Transmitter
• Secondary Element.
• Responsible of passing the information acquired by
the sensor to controller and sending the controller
decision to the final control element.
• Measurement and control signals may be
transmitted or as electrical signals.
• Typical examples:
Electrical transmitters.
www.oilgascourse.com 6
Basic Parameters
Measurement & Control of
following Parameters are
essential for Instrumentation :
• Pressure
• Temperature
• Flow
• Level
www.oilgascourse.com 7
TAPPING POINTS
GASES
STEAM
GASES
LIQUIDS
www.oilgascourse.com 8
Pressure
Pressure measurements are one of the
most common measurements required in
the boiler.
www.oilgascourse.com 10
Pressure
www.oilgascourse.com 11
Temperature Measurement
1. Temperature Gauge:
a. Mercury in Steel type
b. Bi-Metallic
c. Gas Filled
2. Temperature Sensors:
a. RTD
b. Thermocouple
www.oilgascourse.com 12
Flow Measurement
www.oilgascourse.com 13
Flow Measurement
• Installation:
• Flow sensors are installed in line of the
fluid to create DP & hook-ed up with
transmitter for measuring Differential
Pressure, which corresponds to flow:
• Q = K1* (P/T ) * DP
Where,
DP= differential pressure across the flow
element
P = Main Steam Pressure
T = Main steam temperature
K1 = Constant
Q = Compensated flow
www.oilgascourse.com 14
Drum Level
Basic Elements
Drum Level
Steam Flow
Feed Water Flow
www.oilgascourse.com 15
Transmitter
SENSING
TRANSDUCER INDICATION
ELEMENT
www.oilgascourse.com 18
Transmitter
Differential Pressure
Transmitter
www.oilgascourse.com 19
Control Valve
www.oilgascourse.com 20
Control valve in action
(EMERSON,2017)
www.oilgascourse.com 21
Sliding-Stem Control Valve
(EMERSON,2017) www.oilgascourse.com 22
Proses Variability
Process variability is a precise
measure of tightness of control
and is expressed as a
percentage of the set point.
(EMERSON,2017)
www.oilgascourse.com 23
Important Design Aspect of Valve
Deadband
Actuator/positionerdesign
Valve response time
Valve type and characterization
Valve sizing
www.oilgascourse.com 24
Deadband
The range through which an
input signal can be varied,
upon reversal of direction,
without initiating an observable
change in output signal.
(EMERSON,2017)
www.oilgascourse.com 25
Actuator/positioner design
A positioner can be thought of as a high
proportional gain device.
Additional tuning parameters, such as
derivative gain, which largely exist to
remove undesirable characteristics and
further tune the assembly to the
desired performance.
Many positioners also include an
integral capability to remove any
offsets between valve set point and
position.
www.oilgascourse.com 26
Valve response time
Valve response time is measured by a
parameter called T63.
T63 is the time measured from
initiation of the input signal change to
when the output reaches 63% of the
corresponding change.
It includes both the valve assembly
dead time, which is a static time, and
the dynamic time of the valve
assembly.
www.oilgascourse.com 27
Valve type and characterization
(EMERSON,2017) www.oilgascourse.com 28
Control Valve Flow
Characteristics
www.oilgascourse.com 29
Performanc
e test
(EMERSON,2017) www.oilgascourse.com 30
Performance test (2)
Itis critical to measure dynamic
performance of a valve under flowing
conditions so the change in process
variable can be compared to the change
in valve assembly input signal.
For Valve A, the process variable
responds well to input signals as low as
0.5.
Valve B requires input signal changes as
great as 5% before it begins responding
faithfully to each of the input signal
steps.
Valve C is considerably worse, requiring 31
www.oilgascourse.com
Valve sizing
Oversizing the valve hurts process
variability in two ways.
First, the oversized valve puts too much
gain in the valve, leaving less flexibility
in adjusting the controller.
The second way oversized valves hurt
process variability is that an oversized
valve is likely to operate more
frequently at lower valve openings
where seal friction can be greater.
www.oilgascourse.com 32
Control Valve Standards
American Petroleum Institute (API)
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME)
European Committee for Standardization
(CEN)
Fluid Controls Institute (FCI)
Instrument Society of America (ISA)
International Electrotechnical Commission
(IEC)
Manufacturers Standardization Society (MSS)
NACE International
www.oilgascourse.com 33
IEC Standard
60534-1, Part 1: Control valve terminology
and general
considerations
60534-2-1, Part 2: Flow capacity - Section
One: Sizing equations for
incompressible fluid flow under installed
conditions
60534-2-3, Part 2-3: Flow capacity - Section
Three: Test procedures
60534-2-4, Part 2-4: Flow capacity- Section
Four: Inherent flow characteristics and
rangeability
60534-4, Part 4: Inspection and routine testing
60534-5, Part 5: Marking
www.oilgascourse.com 34
IEC Standard (2)
60534-6-2, Part 6-2: Mounting details for
attachment of positioners to control valve
actuators - Section 2:Positioner mounting on
rotary actuators
60534-7, Part 7: Control valve data sheet
60534-8-1, Part 8-1: Noise considerations -
Section One: Laboratory measurement of noise
generated by aerodynamic flow through control
valves
60534-8-2, Part 8-2: Noise considerations -
Section Two: Laboratory measurement of noise
generated by hydrodynamic flow through control
valves
60534-8-3, Part 8-3: Noise considerations -
Section Three: Control valve www.oilgascourse.com
aerodynamic noise35
Control Valve Leakage Classifications
• Class I:
Identical to Class II, III, and IV in construction and design
intent, but no actual shop test is made.
• Class II:
Intended for double-port or balanced singe-port valves with a
metal piston ring seal and metal-to-metal seats. Air or water
at 45 to 60 psig is the test fluid. Allowable leakage is 0.5% of
the rated full open capacity.
• Class III:
Intended for the same types of valves as in Class II.
Allowable leakage is limited to 0.1% of rated valve capacity.
• Class IV:
Intended for single-port and balanced single-port valves with
extra-tight piston seals and metal-to-metal seats. Leakage
rate is limited to 0.01% of rated valve capacity.
www.oilgascourse.com 36
Control Valve Leakage Classifications
• Class V:
Intended for the same types of valves as
Class IV.
The test fluid is water at 100 psig or
operating pressure. Leakage allowed is
limited to 5 X 10 ml per minute per inch of
orifice diameter per psi differential.
• Class VI:
Intended for resilient-seating valves.
The test fluid is air or nitrogen. Pressure is
the lesser of 50 psig or operating pressure.
The leakage limit depends on valve size and
ranges from 0.15 to 6.75 ml per minute for
valve sizes 1 through 8 inches.
www.oilgascourse.com 37
Safety Instrumented
System
SIS is considered separate than the
basic process control system (BPCS) in
that the SIS is dedicated to taking the
process to a “safe state” should a
critical situation occur.
The SIS consists of several safety
instrumented functions (SIF), Each SIF
is a separate or interlinked loop
comprised of sensors, logic solver
(LS), and final control element (FE).
www.oilgascourse.com 38
Safety Standards
IEC Standard 61508 (Functional Safety
of Electric, Electronic and
Programmable Electronic Systems) is
a general standard that covers
functional safety related to all kinds of
processing and manufacturing plans.
IEC Standard 61511 and ISA S84.01
(Replaced by ISA 84.00.01-2004) are
standards specific to the process
industries.
www.oilgascourse.com 39
Components of a Safety
Instrumented System
(EMERSON,2017) www.oilgascourse.com 40
Safety System Basics:
Functional safety:
Part of the overall safety relating to the process and the BPCS which
depends on the correct functioning of the SIS and other protection layers.
(IEC 61511 clause: 3.2.25)
www.oilgascourse.com 41
Process Control versus Safety Control
Operating
Equipment
Protection
System
SIS
www.oilgascourse.com 42
What Is Hazard and What Is Risk?
Hazard
An inherent physical or chemical characteristic that has the potential for
causing harm to people, property, or the environment.
Risk
The combination of the severity and probability of an event.
www.oilgascourse.com 43
Simple Shutdown System: Example 1 Vapour Hazard
PSV
LC
1
I/P
Fluid
Feed
FC
LT
1
www.oilgascourse.com 44
Simple Shutdown System
HS LAHH
Reset 2 2 Tripped Alarm
Logic Solver
LI PSV
2
AS LC
1
I/P
Fluid
Feed
FC FC
LT LT
1 2
FC = fails closed on loss of air pressure
www.oilgascourse.com 45
Typical multiple stage plant trip and ESD system
Stage 1 Plant Emergency Shutdown Command
high pressure
Stage 1
low level
Stage 3 tripped
Stage 1 Trip
Stage 2
high temperature
Stage 2
high level
Stage 3
high level
Stage 2 Trip
www.oilgascourse.com 46
Measurement of Risk
www.oilgascourse.com 47
Risk = Frequency of Event x Consequence
Consequences
Frequency
www.oilgascourse.com 48
To Reduce Risk:
Reduce Frequency or Consequence or do both
Consequences
Risk
Frequency
www.oilgascourse.com 49
Risk Reduction: Design Principles
Hazard Identified
Risk Reduction
Requirement
www.oilgascourse.com 50
Safety Integrity Levels
SIL are quantifiable measurement of risk
used as a quantifiable way to establish
safety performance targets for SIS systems.
IEC standards specify four possible Safety
Integrity Levels (SIL 1, SIL 2, SIL 3, SIL 4);
however, ISA S84.01 only recognizes up to
SIL 3.
Hazards can be identified using a number
of different techniques; one common
technique is a HAZard and OPerability study
(HAZOP).
www.oilgascourse.com 51
Safety Integrity Levels (2)
The HAZOP study is used to identify
the risk to personnel or the
environment and is carried out by a
multi-disciplinary team (HAZOP team).
Once the risk is identified, the
HAZOP/process hazard study (PHA)
will set the requirement for risk
reduction, thus define the required SIL
Level.
www.oilgascourse.com 52
Safety Integrity Levels and
Associated PFDavg and RRF
Figures
www.oilgascourse.com 53
SIS Failure
There are two basic ways for the SIS to
fail.
The first way is commonly called a
nuisance or spurious trip, which usually
results in an unplanned but relatively
safe process shutdown.
The second type, the failure remains
undetected, permitting continued
process operation in an unsafe and
dangerous manner.
These failures are known as hidden
failures and contribute to the probability54
www.oilgascourse.com
Intuitively what does SIL mean ?
Statistical representations of integrity of
SIS
For example: SIL 1….
◦ SIS with availability of 90% is acceptable
◦ High level trip in a liquid tank
◦ Availability of 90% (10% chance of failure)
◦ One out of every 10 times the high level was
reached, there would be a failure
◦ Subsequent overflow 1 out of every 10 times.
www.oilgascourse.com 55
THANK YOU
Training Basic Electrical, Process Control, Stationary & Rotary
Mechanical Equipment untuk HSE Marketing
www.oilgascourse.com 56