|


 


|
  
       
   




     

  
 
      
 
  If you are making a —
  that This could effect my This effects my product
criticizes or make any damaging product negatively positivity because if I
allegation towards someone or a because for example in have evidence, I can
organization you must seek advice from my documentary I can not criticize or make an
the programme lawyer first. This means criticize or make any allegation towards
that programs can criticize, but it must allegations towards a someone, for example in
be the true and they should be able to sports player/member or my documentary if I talk
produce evidence for what they are any person contributing about mental health and
saying, if they have proof of what they towards my documentary refer to one of the sports
are saying, they can not be sued. This without having any players as staying
poses constraints on media productions evidence of what I am mentally fit in other ways
because they can not criticize or make saying. besides exercising, if I
any allegations about someone without have evidence to prove
seeking advice first. Also if a programe this point, I can use it in
does cause any defamation without any my documentary.
proof, they can be sued.


  This means that legal advice must be This could effect my
taken when a programme involves or
make references to any current legal
proceedings, especially criminal
proceedings or involves children, an
example of the is someone recording
inside a court room. This imposes
constraints on media production
because if a programme does involve
or refer to children without legal advice,
this can be seen as a criminal offence.
This effects my product
product negatively
because if I was to
include any information
about current
proceedings in my
documentary for example
if I talked about a sports
player that has appeared
on the news, I will have to
seek advice before hand.
positivity because before
for my documentary I
was going to secretly
film people taking part in
sport activities, now I
know that I must get
permission first. Also
that I should not film any
legal proceedings
without permission.
 This means that if the programme
included any private or
@

 confidential information without because for example if I


the consent of the person or in my documentary if I
organization, legal advice must be
taken from the programme lawyer
immediately. This poses a
constraint on media productions
because in some cases they can
not display someone's private
information because they might
not have permission to do so.
 This means that all material
should be properly cleared by the
producers and the producer of the
programme must get permission
from the copyright owner normally
in a form of a signed agreement.
This poses a constraints on media
productions because if the use
copyright without permission, they
could get sued and also even if
they do get permission to
copyright they must use it
appropriately.
This could effect my This effects my product
product negatively positivity because now I
know that if I want to
include any private
mention a sports information about any of my
players confidential interviews or subject matter
information, I could be which is sports in my
at risk of getting sued, documentary, I need to
unless I have seek advice first.
permission to do so.
This could effect my This effects my product
product negatively positivity because now I
because without know that if I use any sports
permission I can not related images or music
use any copyright that isn't mine, I need to get
material, for example if permission from the
I in my documentary I copyright owner before
want to show archive including it in my
footage of people documentary.
taking part in sport
activities, that I have
taken from the internet,
I will have to get
permission first before I
include it in my
documentary.