0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
132 Ansichten33 Seiten
The document summarizes key details about Jose Rizal and Philippine Law 1425 (also known as the Rizal Law). It discusses Rizal's life and writings, the controversy surrounding his novels, and the 1956 law that mandated teaching about Rizal in schools. The law aimed to foster nationalism but faced opposition from Catholic groups who argued it violated religious freedom by requiring students to read passages seen as anti-Catholic. After debate, a compromise was reached to allow religious exemptions.
The document summarizes key details about Jose Rizal and Philippine Law 1425 (also known as the Rizal Law). It discusses Rizal's life and writings, the controversy surrounding his novels, and the 1956 law that mandated teaching about Rizal in schools. The law aimed to foster nationalism but faced opposition from Catholic groups who argued it violated religious freedom by requiring students to read passages seen as anti-Catholic. After debate, a compromise was reached to allow religious exemptions.
The document summarizes key details about Jose Rizal and Philippine Law 1425 (also known as the Rizal Law). It discusses Rizal's life and writings, the controversy surrounding his novels, and the 1956 law that mandated teaching about Rizal in schools. The law aimed to foster nationalism but faced opposition from Catholic groups who argued it violated religious freedom by requiring students to read passages seen as anti-Catholic. After debate, a compromise was reached to allow religious exemptions.
P. Rizal “It is a useless life that is not consecrated to a great ideal. It is like a stone wasted on the field without becoming a part of any edifice.” –Jose Rizal “What moral right has the white man to look down on the men who have similar thoughts, studies and abilities as they just because their skin is brown or their nose is flat?” Jose Rizal Author: Claro M. Recto
Sponsored the Bill
in the Senate: Jose P. Laurel
Signed: June 12, 1956
What is RA 1425? known as Rizal Law. an act to include in the curricula of all Public and Private Schools, Colleges and Universities courses on the life,works and writings of Jose Rizal, particularly his novels; Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo. composed of 6 sections. Objectives of the Law enrich the minds of the youth about the history of the Philippines The study of the Rizal's works should be implemented by the government. To appreciate Rizal's ideals and teachings in relation to the present conditions of our country and apply in current social problems/issues. To foster the development of the Filipino youth. Highlights of the R.A. 1425: 1. The study of Rizal’s life, works and writings to bring about nationalism among students; 2. The inclusion of works of Rizal in college curriculum particularly the study of his novels-Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo; Highlights of the R.A. 1425: 3.The inclusion also of other works of Rizal such as letters, paintings, and travels;
4. Funding of the law in order to give
supplemental copies of the novels among public libraries; and
5. The implementation of the law.
ANALYSIS ON RIZAL LAW • The adoption of the study of Jose Rizal’s life, works and writings in colleges and universities both public and private is mandated by law; • The study of Rizal’s works particularly his two important novels and other works as well as its translations in Filipino and English should be implemented by the government; 10 ANALYSIS ON RIZAL LAW • In fostering nationalism among youth, Rizal course can give a wide range of thoughts on how Rizal and other heroes fought for freedom for the sake of the country’s necessity to survive against evil imperialism. Brief history of R.A. 1425 Birth of the Noli (1884) •
Purpose: “Ï have tried to do what no man has been
•
willing to do..I have described the state of society…I
have unmasked the hypocrisy, which under the cloak of religion, came among us to impoverish…I have unveiled what lay hidden behind the deceptive and brilliant words of our government: I have told to our compatriots of our culpable and shameful complacence with miseries…the facts which I have related are all true and real; I can give proof of them..” Initial reaction to the noli
The Dominican Archbishop, Pedro Payo,
•
ordered a review of the novel.
Result: it is HERETICAL, IMPIOUS, AND •
SCANDALOUS IN THE RELIGIOUS ORDER,
AND ANTIPATRIOTIC, SUBVERSIVE OF THE PUBLIC ORDER, OFFENSIVE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SPAIN. ATTACKS ON THE NOLI • Fr. Salvador Font – distributed pamphlets in which he enunciated the attacks that Rizal allegedly had made on the different aspects of the Spanish colonial setup. • Governor Valeriano Weyler (Butcher of Cuba)- mere possession of the book (NOLI) will be prosecuted. ATTACKS ON THE NOLI
Friar Jose Rodriguez – issued a series of
•
pamphlets that discussed the dangers in
reading such impious books as the Noli. And he put forward some threatening questions such as “Why should I read them?” “Beware of Them?”And “What do you think of plaque?” “Änd confenssion or damnation?” Defenses of the Noli Marcelo H. del Pilar – circulated his own •
pamphlets, written in Tagalog, the cover
was similar to that of the pamphlets of Fr. Rodriguez but its content was exact opposite. Defenses of the Noli Fr. Vicente Garcia – argued that Rizal’s •
novel must be viewed as a literary work,
not as a doctrine. He considered the book as neither heretical nor blasphemous. Defenses of the Noli • Jose Rizal – for all its faults has served my purpose…it has struck the head of that two-faced Goliath that in the Philippines is called friar rule and mal-administration…my book has not yet been judged and cannot be judged (rightly) because its effects are still being felt. When men it pillories have disappeared from the country’s political life, when a generation arises which does not itself participate in these present crimes….. THE EL FILIBUSTERISMO It was published in the late 1891 in Europe •
and circulated in the Philippines. And like the
Noli, this book also received attack; consequently, the author himself also received the same fate. The governor-general commented on the Fili •
that it was dedicated to the three
priests(GOMBURZA), this made Rizal to be sentences with deportation. RIZAL’S DEFENSE ON THE FILI “with the sincerity and impartiality of which •
a man is capable of looking into his past…
what there was, was a clear-sighted look at the realities in my native country,…but now I see what I call a “novel” come true so exactly that I can say that I am at present the enactment of this work and taking part in it.” Here Rizal was not only an actor but also a victim. The Rizal Bill of 1956 Senator Claro M. Recto authored the •
Senate Bill No. 438 in which he claimed
that, “a constant and inspiring source of patriotism with which the minds of the youth. Especially during their formative and decisive years in school, should be suffused.” Senate bill no.438-debate The debate between the proponents and •
the opponents of the Bill rose to a high level
of emotionalism and ardent patriotism. Verbal jousts (combat), hecklers (those who harass) in the gallery, rising blood pressure, fistfights between two hotheaded representatives. The opponents' side Catholic Action of the Philippines; •
Congregation of the Missions;
•
Knights of Columbus; •
Catholic Teachers Guild
• Opponents' argument They argued that the Bill violated religious •
freedom. Their question was: “Why
compel students to read these books when some passages in them are harmful to their faith?” Opponents' argument Fr. Jesus Cavana, after reviewing the •
novels, found out that a 332-page edition
of the Noli contains 120 pages of anti- Catholic statements and only contains 25 pages of patriotic pages. Opponents' argument • “The Noli and Fili are books of the past, by the past. While they have their place in the Philippine history, they certainly are inadequate Bible of Philippine nationalism today.” Opponents' argument “Rizal is dead. Why should he be roused •
from his sleep? Let him rest in peace.”
The Proponents’side Revolutionary Veterans known as the •
‘Spirit of 1896’ Alagad ni Rizal •
Freemasons •
Book Lovers Society
• Proponents ‘argument They argued that the “opponents of the Bill •
were in effect condemning Rizal’s patriotic
writings to oblivion, by preventing the Filipino youth from reading them. This was worse than what the friars had done; it was tantamount to executing Rizal a second time.” Proponents ‘argument • One veteran claimed that he had risked death just to be able to read the novels of Rizal at the time when the Philippines was not yet free. • “My loyalty to religion ends where my loyalty to my country begins.” Proponents ‘argument
The people who would eliminate the
•
books of Rizal from the schools…would
blot out from our minds the memory of the national hero…now that Rizal is dead and they can no longer attempt at his life, they are attempting to wipe out his memory.” (Claro M. Recto) Proponents ‘argument Catholic schools threatened to close shop if the •
Rizal Bill was passed. Recto calmly told them to go
ahead because then, the state could nationalized them. Some church bigwigs even threatened to ‘punish’ erring legislators in future elections, but Recto simply undaunted. Here was one man willing to risk losing votes because of his principles; this is what I admire so much in Recto. (A. Ocampo) End of the debate Senator Jose Laurel modified the Bill to •
accommodate the objection of the church…
Compulsory for all public and private schools, •
colleges, and universities to include in their
curricula courses on the LIFE, WORKS, and WRITINGS OF JOSE RIZAL, particularly the Noli and Fili, in their original and unexpurgated versions. However, it allowed exemptions from reading such versions for reasons of religious belief.