Sie sind auf Seite 1von 41

CHAPTER 2

FORMULATION AND VERIFICATION OF


ACCOUNTING THEORY

1
Accounting Theory Construction,
Formulation and Verification
 Many different approaches to theory formulation in
accounting
 No single governing theory of accounting is rich enough to
encompass the full range of user-environment specifications
effectively
 Their existence in accounting literature not a theory of
accounting but collections of theories which can be array
over the differences in user environment specification.
 Basic reasoning in theory formulation (How Theory is
Formulated?):
Deductive
Inductive

2
Accounting Theory Construction and Formulation

Deductive
◦ Reasoning from general statements to specific statements
 Example,

◦ P1: All asset accounts have debit balances.


◦ P2: The cash account is an asset account
◦ C : The cash account has a debit balances
 Objective is important part of deductive process. P1 & P2 are

more generalize. C is more specifically to cash account.


 The main objective of theory to provide a framework for the

development of new ideas or new procedures and to help making


choices among alternative procedures.

3
Accounting Theory Construction and
Formulation
Inductive
◦ Reasoning from the particular to the general
 Example,

P1: The cash account is an asset account and has a debit balance.
P2: The Vehicles account is an asset account and has a debit balance.
P3: The land account is an asset account and has a debit balance.
C : All asset accounts have debit balances
 P1, P2, &P3 is so specific for each account. C is generalization from

all P.
 Arguments begins with a set of a particular examples, claim that it

will representative of some greater whole, then infer some


generalization about that whole.

4
Accounting Theory Verification

A theory is evaluated to prove the adequacy of what it proposes.


Bases/criteria for theory verification (or testing a theory) are:
◦ Dogmatic basis
Believe what we read and statements made by others simply
because they have been made by an authority
◦ Self-evident basis
Reasonableness of a statement based on our general
knowledge, experience and observation
◦ Scientific basis
Through testing, research, experimentation and so on
(support with empirical evidence)

5
Paradigms in Accounting Research
Pragmatic Theories
 This relation pertains to “the effect of words or symbols on

people”
 How accounting concepts, and their real world

corresponding events or objects, affect people’s behavior.


 Observe how people react to the same message in different

ways – same financial information, some would buy shares,


some would sell shares
 Relates to “decision model” is that accounting information

must satisfy the information needs of users

6
Approaches to the Development of Accounting Theory: Paradigms in Accounting Research

 Pragmatic theories
 Syntactic & semantic theories (new concepts)
 Normative theories
 Positive theories

7
Recap; Chapter 1

8
Paradigms in Accounting Research
Syntactic Theories
 Rules of the language employed
 Refer to rules of grammar & mathematics
 Analytical methodology basically relied upon syllogism
 If the combination of premise is valid, so the conclusion

was also true.


 Do not need to know the meaning of something to see

that the syllogism is logical.


 By themselves, syntactic propositions have no empirical

content.

9
Paradigms in Accounting Research
Syntactic Theories

Premise 1: All accounts relating to assets have debit balances.


Premise 2: The accumulated depreciation account relates to assets.
Conclusion: The accumulated depreciation account has a debit balance.

10
Paradigms in Accounting Research
Semantic Theories
 Links the basic concepts of a theory to object in the real

world.
 Concern the relationship of a word, sign or symbol to a

real world object or event.


 To make a theory realistic and meaningful.
 For instance, A = L + E is purely abstract, the equation

only realistic and meaningful if we correlate with real


world objects.
 Not concern to the line of logic argument.

11
Paradigms in Accounting Research
Semantic Theories

Premise 1: All asset accounts have debit balances.


Premise 2: The sales returns account is not an asset account.
Conclusion: The sales returns account has a debit balance.

12
Paradigms in Accounting Research
Normative Theories
 1950s and 1960s ‘golden age’

◦ policy recommendations
◦ what should be
◦ concentrated on deriving:
 true income (profit)
 practices that enhance decision-usefulness
◦ based on analytic and empirical propositions

Financial
Financial statements
statements should
should mean
mean what
what
they
they say
say

13
Paradigms in Accounting Research
Normative theories concentration:
 True income:
◦ a single measure for assets
◦ a unique and correct profit figure
 Decision usefulness:
◦ the basic objective of accounting is to aid the decision-
making process of certain ‘users’ of accounting reports by
providing useful accounting data

14
Paradigms in Accounting Research
Positive Theories
 Expanded during the 1970s
 Based on ‘experiences’ or ‘facts’ of the real world
 Explain the reasons for current practice
 Predict the role of accounting information in decision-

making
 The main difference between normative and positive

theories is that:
◦ normative theories are prescriptive
◦ positive theories are descriptive, explanatory or
predictive

15
Accounting Theory Approaches
 Traditional Approach
 Regulatory Approach
 Positive Approach
 Behavioral Approach
 Paradigm Approach

16
Accounting Theory Approaches

Traditional Approach
1. Non-theoretical Approaches (pragmatic and
authoritarian)
2. Theoretical:
a. Deductive approach
b. Inductive approach
c. Ethical approach
d. Sociological approach
e. Economic approach
f. Eclectic approach
17
Accounting Theory Approaches
1. Non-theoretical Approaches

Pragmatic Approach:
 Consists of the construction of a theory that conforms to real-world

practices
 E.g. Observing the practices and techniques of working accountants.
 Also concerns about usefulness & relevance of accounting

information for decision making


 How real world affects people’s behaviour

Authoritarian Approach:
 The formulation of accounting theory, which is employ primarily by

professional organization, consists of issuing pronouncements for the


regulation of accounting practices

18
Accounting Theory Approaches
2. Theoretical Approaches
a) Deductive Approach
 Constructions of accounting theory begins with basic

propositions & proceeds to derive logical conclusions about


the subject under considerations
 Move from general to particular

b) Inductive Approach
 The construction of accounting theory begins with

observations & measurements & moves toward generalized


conclusions
 Move from particular to general

19
Accounting Theory Approaches
c) Ethical Approach
 The basic core consists of the concepts of fairness, justice, equity and truth
 In general, the concept of fairness implies that accounting statements have not been

subject to undue influence or bias


 Justice; equitable treatment of all interested parties

 Truth; with true & accurate accounting without misrepresentation

d) Sociological Approach
 Emphasizes the social effects of accounting techniques

 According to this approach, a given accounting principle or technique is

evaluated for acceptance on the basis of its reporting effects on all groups in
society
 Implies that accounting data will be useful in making social welfare

judgments
 Encourage business entity to account the impact of business activities on

social environment through financial statement.

20
Accounting Theory Approaches

e) Economic Approach
 Emphasizes controlling the behavior of macroeconomic indicators that result
from the adoption of various accounting techniques
 The choice of different accounting techniques depends on their impact on the
national economic good
 Accounting policies and techniques should reflect ‘economic reality’, and the
choice of accounting techniques should depend on ‘economic consequences’
 e.g. LIFO method during continuing inflation period

f) Eclectic (Combination) Approach


 In general, the formulation of accounting theory and the development of
accounting principles have followed an eclectic approach
 A combination of approaches, rather than just one approach.
 This approach has given rise to the new approaches such as regulatory,
behavioral and positive
21
Accounting Theory Approaches
Regulatory Approach
Why Examine Theories of Regulation:
 Better placed to understand why some accounting

prescriptions become part of legislation while others do not


 Accounting standard-setting is a very political process

 While some proposed requirements may be technically sound

and logical, they may not be mandated due to political


‘power’ or influence of some affected parties
 Theories that explain regulation:

1. Public Interest Theory


2. Capture Theory
3. Economic Interest Group Theory (Private Interest Theory)

22
Accounting Theory Approaches
1.Public Interest Theory
◦ Regulation put in place to benefit society as a
whole rather than vested interests
◦ Regulatory body considered to represent interests
of the society in which it operates, rather than
private interests of the regulators
◦ Assumes that government is a neutral arbiter (a
person who settles a dispute)

23
Accounting Theory Approaches

2. Capture Theory
◦ This theory was designed by political scientists J.
Hertog.
◦ The theory states that regulations are manipulated
to fit the requirements of those affected by them.
◦ The theory suggests that over a given period of
time regulations serve the interests of the industries
concerned.

24
Accounting Theory Approaches

3. Economic Interest Group Theory (Private


Interest Theory)
◦ Assumes groups will form to protect particular economic
interests
◦ Groups are often in conflict with each other and will lobby
government to put in place legislation which will benefit
them at the expense of others
◦ No notion of public interest inherent in the theory
◦ Regulators (and all other individuals) deemed to be
motivated by self-interest

25
Accounting Theory Approaches

Positive Approach
 Based on the work of Ross Watts and Jerold Zimmerman in
1978 and 1986
 This approach focuses on understand, explain and predict

existing accounting practices


 The positive accounting theory is based on the propositions

that managers, shareholders and regulators/politicians are


rational and attempt to maximize their utility or welfare
 Their choice of accounting policy rests on comparing the

relative costs and benefits of alternative accounting


procedures so as to maximize their utility or welfare

26
Accounting Theory Approaches
Behavioural Approach
 A new multidisciplinary area in the field of accounting has
been conveniently labeled ‘behavioural accounting’
 The basic objective of behavioural accounting is to explain
and predict behaviour in all possible accounting contexts
 The behavioural approach to accounting theory formulation
is concerned with human behavior as it relates to
accounting information and problems

27
Accounting Theory Approaches
Accounting Paradigms
 A paradigm is a fundamental image of the subject
matter of science.
 It serve to define what should be asked, & what rules
should be followed in interpreting the answer obtained.
 The paradigm is the broadest unit of consensus within
a science & serves to differentiate one scientific
community from another.
 It includes, defines, & interrelates the exemplars,
theories, methods, & instruments that exists within it.

28
Accounting Theory Approaches
Accounting literature suggests the following basic
accounting paradigms:
 The anthropological paradigm – accounting

practices as the domain of accounting


 The behavior of the markets paradigm – the capital

market reaction as the domain of accounting


 The economic event paradigm – the prediction of

economic events as the domain of the accounting


 The decision process paradigm – the decision

theories and the decision processes of individual as the


domain of accounting

29
Accounting Theory Approaches
 The ideal income paradigm – the measurement of
performance as the domain of accounting
 The information economics paradigm – the

evaluation of information as the domain of


accounting
 The user behavior paradigm – the information

recipients’ behavior as the domain of accounting

30
 AAA publication of Statement of Accounting
Theory & Theory Acceptance;
1. The anthropological / inductive paradigm
2. The true-income / deductive paradigm
3. The decision usefulness / decision-model
paradigm
4. The decision usefulness / decision – maker/
aggregate – market- behavior paradigm
5. The decision usefulness / decision-maker/
individual user paradigm
6. The information / economic paradigm

3
1. The anthropological / inductive paradigm

 Concern for inductive approach to


construction of accounting theory & a believe
the value of accounting practice.
 The research concern on significance of

historical cost in term of accountability &


decision making.
 Those who adopt this paradigm, the basic

subject mater is;


◦ Existing accounting practice
◦ Management attitude towards those practice
(management plays a central role in determined
technique to be implemented)
3
 Four theories under this paradigm
I. Information economics
II. The agency model
III. The income smoothing / earning
management hypothesis
IV. The positive theory of accounting

3
2. The true-income / deductive
 The basic subject matter is a concept of ideal income
based on some other method than the historical cost
method.
 It generally employed analytic reasoning to justify the

construction of an accounting theory or to argue the


advantage of particular asset-valuation / income
determination model other than historical-coat
accounting.
 The theories;

I. Price level adjusted accounting;


II. Replacement –cost accounting;
III. Deprival-value accounting
IV. Net realizable value accounting
V. Present-value accounting

3
3. The decision usefulness / decision-model paradigm

 Rely on empirical technique to determined


predictive ability of selected items of
information.
 Two related theories;

i. Decision models associated with business


decision making (EOQ, Capital Budgeting etc.)
ii. Deals with different economic events that may
effect a going concern.

3
4. The decision usefulness / decision –
maker/ aggregate – market- behavior
paradigm
 Important relationship between accounting
data and market behavior.
 Aggregate market behavior & accounting

variables is based on theory market


efficiency.
 Those theory include;

I. The efficient market model


II. The efficient market hypothesis
III. The capital asset pricing model
IV. The arbitrage pricing theory
V. The equilibrium theory of option pricing
3
5. The decision usefulness / decision-maker/ individual user paradigm

 Is the study of how accounting functions & reports


influence the behavior of accountants & non
accountants.
 The basic subject matter is the individual-user

response to accounting variables.


 The objective is to understand, explain & predict

human behavior within an accounting context.


 The theories include;

I. Cognitive relativism in accounting


II. Cultural relativism in accounting
III. Behavioral effect of accounting information
IV. Linguistic relativism in accounting

3
6. The information / economic
paradigm
 The usefulness of information to the future
development of accounting theory.
 The basic subject matter is;

◦ Information is an economic commodity


◦ The acquisition of information amounts to a problem
of economic choice
 Generally employ analytic reasoning based on
statistical decision theory & economic theory of
choice.
 Central to the information/economic paradigm

is the traditional economic assumption of


consistent, rational choice behavior.
3
Need and Importance of Accounting
Theory
 To provide a basis for prediction and explanation
of accounting behaviours and events and help to
understand current development in accounting
practice.
 Provide general frame of reference by which

accounting practice can be evaluated.


 Guide the development of new practices and

procedures

39
Accounting Theory and Policy Making
 The two groups that determine accounting policy
are the government and the accounting profession.
 The government employs legislative process to

ensure minimum level information disclosed in


company’s report.
 Accounting profession as a regulatory body deals

with problems of accounting standards implied in


financial reports.

40
Structure of Accounting Theory
 The structure of accounting theory serve as frame of reference that is use
to judge the extend to which a particular accounting technique of
accounting is adequate.
 Based on a set of elements and relationship that govern the development
of accounting technique.
 The five elements in the structure of an accounting theory are:
 Objectives of Financial Statement (True and fair view)
 Accounting Postulates (Assumptions)(Entity, Going Concern, Unit-of-
measure, Accounting Period)
 Accounting Concepts (A=L+OE)
 Accounting Principles (Cost, Revenue, Matching, Objectivity,
Consistency, Full Disclosure, Conservatism, Materiality)
 Accounting Techniques (specific rules derived from the accounting
principles that account for specific transactions and events faced by the
accounting entity)

41

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen