0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
34 Ansichten4 Seiten
The document provides guidance for writing a strong critique of an article. It lists eight important questions to consider, such as whether the article provided enough background information, included an adequate discussion and conclusions, and discussed all important aspects of its field. It emphasizes writing critiques in a formal, organized way using different expressions and examples to support claims, while keeping the third-person point of view. The document also provides examples of expressions that could be used in a critique, such as general points of view and agreeing or disagreeing with opinions.
The document provides guidance for writing a strong critique of an article. It lists eight important questions to consider, such as whether the article provided enough background information, included an adequate discussion and conclusions, and discussed all important aspects of its field. It emphasizes writing critiques in a formal, organized way using different expressions and examples to support claims, while keeping the third-person point of view. The document also provides examples of expressions that could be used in a critique, such as general points of view and agreeing or disagreeing with opinions.
The document provides guidance for writing a strong critique of an article. It lists eight important questions to consider, such as whether the article provided enough background information, included an adequate discussion and conclusions, and discussed all important aspects of its field. It emphasizes writing critiques in a formal, organized way using different expressions and examples to support claims, while keeping the third-person point of view. The document also provides examples of expressions that could be used in a critique, such as general points of view and agreeing or disagreeing with opinions.
Jhon Taylor Usma Any Dahiana Grajales Julián Riascos You must take into account when writing your critique Did they provide enough background information for the Do the authors include an intended audience to understand adequate discussion, analysis and it? For you to understand it? conclusions? Did they justify How confident are you in the articles results/information and everything adequately? why? Ask yourself In what way should the article have What are the articles fault and made a contribution, but then did limitations? did it discuss all the not? important aspects and issues in its field? Were there adequate and appropriate examples and Are its ideas really new, or do the illustrations? authors simply repackage old ideas How complete and thorough a job and give them a new name? did the authors do? IMPORTANT !!!
● Always keep the above eight questions in mind while making
your critique. ● Use different expressions when writing a critique. ● Use the third-person ● Discuss by reading the strengths and weaknesses of the article. ● Express your opinions clearly and accurately. ● Use specific examples to support your claims. ● Write in a formal and organized way. Examples of expressions you could use: Benefits General point of view ● No one can argue that ... 1. Increases insight and perspective ● It is generally accepted that ... ● Most people say ... 2. Creates bonds 3. Cultivates a trustworthy workplace According to an opinion ● I agree with the idea of ... ● I completely agree with this opinion ... ● I couldn't agree more on ...