Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
INDIAN SCENARIO
In 2012, a successful year, Wishberry followed by Kitto and Milap and in
2015, Impact guru, largest platform for medical causes were launched for
fundraising.
• In 2013, first ever crowdfunding regional film, Lucia raised Rs. 51 Lakh in
just 10 days through Facebook page and a blog.
• Dhirubhai Ambani’s small yet growing textile business was crowdfunded
by communities across Gujrat.
CROWDFUNDING MODEL
General statutes such as the Income Tax Act, 1961, The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010
(FCRA) and the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) applies to all types of
crowdfunding.
COMMUNITY CROWDFUNDING
• Solicitation of funds for social, artistic, • Solicitation of funds from investors in exchange for
philanthropic or other purpose, and not in existing or future tangible rewards
exchange for anything of tangible value. • Subset of Donation Crowdfunding.
• Area of focus: Social causes. • Three Categories:
• No yield or returns on investment Pre orders, Services and Recognition.
• No minimum or maximum amount for donation. • Area of Focus: Small Entrepreneurs, Free software
development companies, creative & innovative
• Service Fees : 5 -10% projects.
• Example: Milaap, Rocket fund, Impact Guru, • Examples: Wishberry,
Crowd funder, etc.
• Indiegogo and Kickstarter (largest)- run at least
4,00,000 projects including “Potato Salad and
Mission to Mars”.
• Fundly- 4.9% service fees
FINANCIAL RETURN CROWDFUNDING
PEER TO PEER LENDING / DEBT BASED EQUITY BASED CROWDFUNDING
Alternate source of funding and allows increased flow of credit to start-ups, SME sectors, and other users.
Assists SMEs to raise funds at a lower cost and through a simpler procedure as compared to other modes.
Efficiency- The platforms ability to centralize and streamline the fundraising effort will result in ample time for the borrower
to run the business.
PR &Marketing- Promotion and campaign opportunities through social media and other marketing tactics.
Presentation- Creation of crowdfunding campaign helps in reviewing the business and polish it better.
Due Diligence and vetting of the projects hosted on the platform’s website to maintain their reputation.
Networking- Enables borrowers to reach to wide range of investors that are beyond personal connections.
Risk of Fraud: Possibility of genuine website being used by fraudsters and false websites being established
leading to risk of cyber security and identity theft.
Risk of Failure: High failure risk as funds raised by early stage companies or ventures depend on future
possibilities . Ex: Bubble and Balm, a fair trade soap company.
Information Asymmetry: Certain investors may have access to information which is not available to others.
Accounts raised and deposited by platforms not monitored
No stringent obligations on reporting and transparency leading to misrepresentations.
Systemic Risk: Secondary market not available for investors causing a risk of low liquidity.
Can give rise to cross- border implications.
CONSULTATION PAPER ON CROWDFUNDING - SEBI
2) Accreditation of Investors and Investment
1) Access to Market and Eligibility of Fundraisers. Limits.
• Size of issue not exceed Rs. 10 Crores. • Participation Restricted to Accredited investors.
• Not promoted, sponsored or related to an industrial QIB’s – 5% of each company.
group with turnover more than Rs. 25 Crores or having Companies with minimum net worth 20
an established business. Crores. HNI’s with minimum net worth 2 Crores.
• Listed and less than 48 months old.
• Not engaged to real estate or policies prohibited under • Eligible Retail investors – Do not invest more than
India’s Industrial Policy . Rs. 60,000 and 10% of net worth.
• Directors, Promoters and Associates not declared as Min annual gross income 10 lakh.
“defaulter” by RBI / CIBIL and not prohibited from Filed income tax return for min 3 preceding financial years.
accessing capital market. Well advised and passed an appropriateness test.
3) Regulation of Portals
Procedure requires the company’s details be displayed on website and circulate a private placement offer letter to the
interested investors.
Companies are required to circulate information similar to private placement under Companies Act, 2013.
These disclosures include:
Name of the company, registered office address, history of funding, financial condition of company, ownership
details and capital structure, etc.
LOOPHOLES OF CONSULTATION PAPER
• No Fee Structure: It is crucial for targeted entities to analyse the capital raising cost.
• Classification of Entities: Prevents business from developing and curb donation or reward based platforms to run equity
based crowd funding campaigns.
• Increased cost and Reduces Efficacy: Proposed procedural requirements, due diligence and background and regulatory
check for the investors holding above 20% equity .
FACTS:
Two unlisted companies, SIRCL and SHICL, raised funds over USD 3 billion from nearly 30 million investors by
issuing OFCD’s and distributing information memorandum through approximately a million agents and three thousand
branch offices to more than specifically to and/or friends, associated group companies, workers/employees and other
individuals associated with Sahara Group were eligible to apply for the issue of these OFCDs.
ISSUE:
Whether the OFCDs issued by SIRECL and SHICL were by way of “private placement”- as claimed by the Sahara
Companies on appeal, or by way of an invitation “to the public” - as counter claimed by the SEBI?
JUDGEMENT:
The Court accepted SEBI’s contention that the OFCDs issued by SIRECL and SHICL was by way of an invitation “to the
public” and therefore sufficient in order to attract the provisions of Section 73. (Mandatory listing of securities)
AFTERMATH:
Ministry of Corporate Affairs introduced a new provision in the then Companies Bill 2011 (enacted in 2013).
The Companies Bill 2011 was scheduled to replace the earlier Companies Act of 1956 and inserted Section
42(2) , explanation 1.
Section 42 (1) & (2): private placement be offered through private placement offer letter.
Limits investors who can issue shares up to 50 members and who can make offer for issue of shares up to 200
members in a financial year, excluding QIB’s and employees.
Investor Caution Notice (2016)- On 30thOctober, 2016, press release issued , SEBI found that:-
“The electronic platforms are allegedly facilitating investment in the form of private placement with
companies, as the offer is open to all the investors registered with the platform amounting to a
contravention of the provisions of Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1956 (SCRA) and the Companies
Act, 2013.”
Questions raised on legality of platforms like, Lets Venture, Term Sheet, Equity Crest, Grex, etc.
Listed over six digital equity crowdfunding platform “unauthorized, unregulated and illegal”
• Notice and Disclaimer (2017): SEBI sent notices to a dozen angel networks asking them to reveal
details of their fundraising business.
Disclaimer – “crowdfunding platforms are neither stock exchanges nor authorized by the capital markets
regulator to solicit investments and declare the securities traded on these platforms are not traded on any
regulated exchange.”
JURISDICTION – SEBI OR MCA?
• SEBI doesn’t have absolute jurisdiction and overlaps with MCA as it is a hybrid of both public offer and
private placement.
• Crowdfunding participation not limited to listed public companies but extends to unlisted public and private
companies.
• Private placement not prohibited under companies act, 2013 and recognizes maintenance of statutory register
in electronic forms.
• MCA Jurisdiction – Private placement regulated under Section 24 of Companies Act, 2013.
• SEBI Jurisdiction (Sahara Case )- Section 55 A of Companies Act, 2013.