Learnings

SUBMITTED BY:

AKASH DHIMAN - 2011010

NIHAL JAIN - 2011151
NISHANT YADAV - 2011152
AADITYA SINGH - 2011245
PARTH THAKUR - 2011259
Learnings from Framing Questions
• Holistic view of different aspects of traits
• To minimize bias due to self-perception, include indirect and direct
questions

• Look for attitudes and behaviour from daily life to ascertain personality

• People can behave in a manner that does not conform with their
personality
 Asking Questions...
Personalities aren't clear cut

Difference between what people are

and what people are tempted to be

Trait Activation theory might

explain contradictions
Learnings from Answers and Reports
 Self-Evaluation

Akash Dhiman Aaditya Singh

• Discrepancy in openness to
• Discrepancy in
experience trait
extraversion trait
• Wrong interpretation of
Conscientiousness trait
 Self-Evaluation

Parth Thakur Nihal Jain Nishant Yadav

• Discrepancy in • Discrepancy in • Got the expected result
Agreeableness trait Conscientiousness
Learnings From 3rd Phase

● Even after correct communication

and interpretations different people
deduce different conclusions from
facts
● Different people assign different
importance to different characteristics
while ascertaining personality

● For instance structured and organized

thinking versus reliability
DISASTROUS COMBINATIONS

Highly open + Low agreeableness = Low openness + high agreeableness

Time waster = Poor critical thinking

Extreme openness to experience High conscientiousness + low

might cause poor decision making High Extraversion + low conscientiousness = agreeableness + low openness =
gossiper Frustration
Thank You