( CIPLAN/COPLAN )

 
 INTRODUCTION :
The PNP plays a vital role in the
maintenance of peace and order and
crime prevention in every community.
Thus, it is important on the part of
every investigator to know the aspect
of info gathering and follow up
investigation to

 
Moreover, a Case Operational
Plan is important to investigation
as the last resort when normal
police operations fail.
Atthe end of this subject, the
participants will be able to:
When to make CIPLAN/COPLAN
How to make CIPLAN/COPLAN
Know the Investigation
Management System
CIPLAN is necessary when there is a
occurence of sensational crime which
attract national and international
public attention which are directed to
against elected officials,judges,
prosecutors, lawyers, media
 prosecutors, lawyers, media
Practioners,militantleaders,
foreign national,religious leaders
and movie personalities.
• It refers to the background of the
incident that happened, substantive
offenses,jurisdiction, targets,
anticipated duration, multi-agency
investigation and special arrangement
in the conduct of investigation.

-
 MISSION

To identify the possible perpetrators

and to determine the motive of alleged
killing or crime incident happened.
 It
is the proper strategic action to be
taken in order to attain the specific
mission during the conduct of
investigation by determining the
proper time, proper action and by
setting coordination handling the
case to be investigated. 
 Barriers or problems that may arise
during the conduct of investigation that
must be considered by finding
immediate solution of theinvestigation.
 What might be the possible motive re

the killing or incident happenedbeing

investigated. 
 COMMAND AND COMMUNICATION
-Proper coordination of personnel
investigated the case by considering all
the available communications, resources
as well as proper channeling of the
information gathered which useful and
material to the case/crime being
investigated
 COMMAND AND COMMUNICATION
Equipment used during the conduct
of investigation like radio, mobility
and related thereto.
Recording System during tactical
interrogation of the suspect and the
gathering of information of the witnesses
for the aid of the investigation.

.
It is the over-all strategy applied in order to achieve the desired outcome of the case being investigated.
Sam pl e F orm s :
Ev ide nce M atri x
Re s o urce Sp rea d She et
Le ad She et
As s ig nm ent Sh ee t
M ajo r Inv es tiga tio n P lan
 Allegation Allegation Offence Elements/Facts in Avenues of Inquiry
Issue
A general statement
A general statement
outlining the aim of the outlining the aim of the
investigation. investigation.
The statement need not The statement need not be
List the elements of the
be in technical need not in technical need not be in List all possible offenses
offence/s together with any How the elements of the
be in technical terms, so technical terms, so long as that can be gleaned from
relevant issues that may crime are to be satisfied.
long as it is clear and it is clear and easily the circumstances.
affect the investigation.
easily understood. understood.
This statement will set This statement will set the
parameters of the
the parameters of the
investigation.
investigation.

EXAMPLE: EXAMPLE: EXAMPLE: EXAMPLE: EXAMPLE:

At about 9:00 am At about 9:00 am .ART 248. RPC (Murder) ART. 248 – RPC ART. 248-RPC
September 13, 2010 September 13, 2010 PD 1866, as amended by 1.Intent to kill 1.Deployment of SOCO
Mangdatu’s WIFE, R.A. 8294. 2.Qualifying aggravating 2.Interview/secure
Mangdatu’s WIFE,
twenty(20) political allies, Omnibus Election Code circumstances testimonial evidence from
twenty(20) political
thirty-five(35) media 2. Treachery; witness
allies, thirty-five(35) Personalities were found 2.2 in consideration of 3.Application of Search
media Personalities dead at Sharif Aguak, Price,Rewards and Warrant/WOA
were found dead at Maidanao, allegedly due to Promises; 4.Employment of the
Sharif Aguak, Maidanao, multiple gunshot wounds. 2.3 Taking Advantage services of the PNP Crime
allegedly due to multiple Suspect(s): Datu Unsay of Superior Strength; Laboratory
gunshot wounds. Ato and Several John 2.5 with cruelty by PD 1866 as amended by
Suspect(s): Datu Unsay Does deliberately and R.A. 8294
Ato and Several John inhumanely augmenting Record check/coordination
 First Case: ACTIVITY / SUSPECT WITNESSES/
Responding Victim: ACTION TO BE ARRESTED/AT INFORMANT/ REMARKS
Officer TAKEN LARGE INFORMER
REQUIRED

SPO1 Juan Case: Murder Secure the crime Datu Unsay Ms. Nena Tatlong To include evidence
PO2 Areglado Victim: scene Ampatuwad Hari confiscated/
PO2 Maligalig Mangundadatus Inventory of Datu Andal Manny Pokyaw Examined by SOCO
WIFE, 20 political confiscated Ampatuwad For filling in
allies, 35 media evidence court/evidences was
personalities Identification of the turned to PO3
suspects Kastigador property
Ref: 130900H Oct custodian of Sharif
2010 Agwak on Oct 16,
Lead Investigator 2010
PO3 Imbestigador
PO2 Tan
PO2 Caronungan

Avenues of Inquiry
Taken directly from the Evidence
Matrix.
How the elements of the crime are
to be satisfied.
EXAMPLE:
ART. 248-RPC
1.Deployment of SOCO
2. Interview / secure testimonial
evidence from witnesses
3. Application of Search Warrant/
WOA
4. Employment of the services of
the PNP Crime Laboratory
time for
Completion of
Tasks Resource To Be Tasked
task
May June July
The tasks necessary to complete The individual (Region, Division,
the avenues of inquiry. Branch, Unit, or Squad) allocated
‘Task for Completion’.
EXAMPLE: EXAMPLE:
Coordinate w/ the Crime “TF Maguindanao”
Laboratory (SOCO) with regard to Local Police Unit.
physical evidence gathered and SOCO
collected; and the result of
scientific investigation (forensic,
ballistic, etc)
Interview of witnesses;
Interrogation of suspects, if
possible;
Filling of Charges in Court
 Member/s Task Call Sign Comms Equipment Special Note

(First Responder) ATS 2500hh radio Subject PNCOs

SPO1 Juan Secure the crime Patrol 1 CH 1 Mobile phone: Police notebook who are the 1st
PO2 Areglado scene 09191234567 responder on the
PO2 Maligalig crime scene.

(investigator – on - Team Leader/

case) searcher, recorder, Ranger 2 ATS 2500hh radio Investigators Kit Lead investigator on
PO3 Imbestigador interviewer, CH 1 case.
Members: exhibits/evidence Mobile phone:
PO2 Tan custodian 09192345678
PO1 Caronungan

ATS 2500hh radio

SOCO Team Entry team Eagle 3 Ch 1 SOCO Manual Process crime
Search team Mobile phone: scene which
Interview Smith 09193456789 requires scientific
findings

Follow-up Entry team Panther 4 ATS 2500hh radio Tape recorder Follow-up
investigator Search team Ch 1 Note books investigation of the
Corroborate Earle Mobile phone: case
09171234567
 TIME TAKEN
STRATEGIC SMECAC QUALITY OF TO COMPLETE COST OF
PLANNING RESULTS THE TASK INVESTIGATION
TOOLS ACHIEVED

Investigative equipment Application of SMECAC
- evidence collection kit
- cast molding kit
- finger print kit
- question document kit
- arson kit
- post blast investigation
kit
- integrated ballistic
identification system kit
(IBIS)
- automated finger print
identification system
(AFPIS)
 To motivate every From time of crime Mobility/Gasoline-
Principle personnel to perform incident up to the proper P1500.00
their specific task to filling of criminal case Food and Snacks-
achieve the desired (36hrs.) P400.00
objectives Load- P300.00
Crime Laboratory has Miscellaneous: 1,500.00
state of the art
equipment which can
give accurate in aid of
investigation.
Furthermore, it is ISO
certified by International
Standard.
 C. (COPLAN) –
Refers to a preparatory plan on how
to carry out a case operation which
is the last resort to pursue intelligence
objectives when normal police
operations fail.
 WHEN TO MAKE COPLAN

PRINCIPLES OF COPLAN
 Mission –

Situation-
 Operational Plan -
 Administrative ,-
 Communication-
 Reports-
 COPLAN PRINCIPLES
1. CASE OPERATION PLAN : (Code name)
 PROJECT REFERENCE: ( Code name/NSU
umbrella project)
 
REFERENCE:
1. SITUATION:
  Background:
General situation, Historical facts,
Operational Conditions,Why case opns
II. MISSION:
Purpose:
Same purpose stated in the
intelligence project
Objective(s):
One or a number of
interrelated objectives
Targets:
Specific person,Group of
persons Organization
III. OPERATIONAL PLAN
More specific Task:
  Who will perform?
What is to be performed?
When to start?
How done?
Why it should be done?
What is the expected outcome?
Personnel:
Involved in the operation
Finance:
Estimated quarterly expenses
Supply and equipment
Operational purpose 
Transportation: 
Vehicle and POL , Miscellaneous
Plan of commo
Commo agreement
Recognition and identification
Commo Policies
 SUMMARY:
 
The Criminal Investigation Plan and Investgn
Plan Mgmt System is the best method in the
conduct of criminal & follow up investigation for
the immediate solution of a crime and the filing of
air tight case in court against a suspect & his
conviction.
.
Coplan is a last resort to pursue intelligence
Objectives where known and identified personalitieswill
be subject for immediate neutralization.
{ End of Briefing }

Wassalam ! ! ! !
 (Figure
 
6, Investigation Plan Scenario )

 On october 25, 2010 an unidentified female cadaver wearing a yellow petit

monde blouse, white pants and black leather shoes with blue handbag
beside her was found dead along Brgy. San Rafael, Subic, Zambales by
one MARCOS AQUINO y BINAY, 35 years old married, businessman and
a resident of #11 Gumamela St., Camayan Ville Subdivision, Brgy. San
Rafael, Subic, Zambales at about 7:00 AM of the same date while having
his morning jog. Mr AQUINO immediately proceeded to the Barangay Hall
of Barangay San Rafael, Subic, Zambales just a few meters away from the
crime scene where he reported the incident to the Barangay Chairman
identified as HERMOGENES IBDANI y BELSOSA who in turn reported it
to Subic Municipal Police Station.

 Chairman IBDANI together with Mr. AQUINO and other barangay security
force personnel boarded their patrol car and proceeded at the crime scene.
Upon arrival they saw the lifeless body of the victim with gunshot wound on
her face lying flat on the pavement with her hand back beside her.
 
 After processing the crime scene the SOCO operative turned over the same
to the investigator-on-case together with the following pieces f evidence:
 
 One (1) female cadaver between 45 to 50 years old above 5’2 in height with
the above description and with wound on her left cheek believed to be caused
by gunshot.
 One (1) Armani handbag containing:
 
 - assorted IDs with victim’s photo but written in foreign letters
 - one (1) Asiana Airline Stub with name KIM MEH JUNG with Philippine
address at Unit 11 Roligon Tower, Quirino Ave., Pasay City who arrived in
Manila on October 15, 2010
 Fifty (50) thousand pesos in different denominations
 Twenty (20) thousand Korean won
 Two (2) empty shell of 9mm caliber firearm
 The victim KIM ME JUNG from Soul South Korea with Philippine address at Unit
11 Roligon Towers, Quirino Ave., Pasay City who arrived in Manila on October
15, 2010.
 
 She (victim) was a wealthy heiress who owns vast property and business in
Soul South Korea and is here in the Philippines for a business hunt. She stays
in Manila with her daugther HAN JI MOON at Roligon Towers.
 
 The victim is married but seperated to his husband identified as HAN CHANG
SOO a businessman from Ichon South Korea who arrived in Manila on October
10, 2010 and staying at Winston Hotel Aurora Boulevard Extention, Pasay City.

 The victim’s driver ROBERTO PACQUING y MARGARINE, 45 years old, single

but with common-law-wife and residing at # 12 Mansanas St,. Pildera 2 Pasay
City claimed to have pick-up the victim and her daugther, HAN JI MOON, in
front of Roligon Towers at about 5:00 PM and dropped the victim at SM Mall of
Asia and immediately entered the mall at about 5:30 PM. Driver ROBERTO
PACQUING y MARGARINE and the victim daugther left SM Mall of Asia and
headed for Quezon City.
 A Barangay Security Force Identified as ROMAN GUERRERO y RAPIDO
of legal age and a resident of Purok 2, Brgy. San Rafael, Subic, Zambales
who was on duty at the Barangay Hall claimed that at about 11:30 PM of
October 20, 2010 he heard two sucessive gunshots coming from the crime
scene area but he just ignored.

 One GARDO MACHETE y VERSOSA 20 years old, out-of-school youth and

resident of # 13 Purok 3, Brgy. San Rafael, Subic, Zambales averred that
at about 11:30 PM of October 20, 2010 he was walking home from a
birthday party when he saw one color black van and color blue car, plate
number of which he failed to get, ran fast coming from the crime scene and
headed towards the highway and got lost under the cover of darkness.
 One (1) female cadaver between 45 to 50 years old above 5’2 in height with
the above description and with wound on her left cheek believed to be
caused by gunshot.
 One (1) Armani handbag containing;
 Assorted IDs with victim’s photo but written in foreign letters
 - one (1) Asiana Airline Stub with name KIM MEH JUNG with Philippine
address at Unit 11 Roligon Tower, Quirino Ave., Pasay City who arrived in
Manila on October 15, 2010
 Fifty (50) thousand pesos in different denominations
 Twenty (20) thousand Korean won
 Two (2) empty shell of 9mm caliber firearm
• This four (4) pages form will be used for the evaluation of
the Training Program and the improvement of the
program and management thereof. Please indicate and/or
write your honest analyses, comments and suggestions
for improving the training program. Thank You!
• Instructions: Please state your assessment of the
suitability of the course objectives with the
corresponding investigation works where it is
supposedly applicable, using the following scale:
• 5 – Strongly Agree (SA)
• 4 – Agree (A)
• 3 – Moderately Agree (MA)
• 2 – Disagree (D)
• 1 – Strongly Disagree (SD)
No INDICATOR: Suitability of the Course Objectives with the corresponding FEEDBACK
level of investigation works 5 4 3 2 1

01 Did you find the General Course Objectives appropriate according to the needs
of your present designation / function?
If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

02 Were the General Course Objectives clearly presented and explained?

If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

03 At the end of the whole course, were the General Course Objectives achieved?
If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

04 At the end of the whole course, did you find the Learning Process to be holistic,
in such that it involved Cognitive (Knowledge), Affective (Emotional/Ethical) and
Psychomotor (Skills & Movements)?
If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:
• Instructions: Please state your assessment of the
responsiveness of the curriculum you’ve undertaken
in relation to the corresponding level of investigation
works, using the following scale:
• 5 – Strongly Agree (SA)
• 4 – Agree (A)
• 3 – Moderately Agree (MA)
• 2 – Disagree (D)
• 1 – Strongly Disagree (SD)
No. INDICATOR: Appropriateness of the method of instruction in relation to FEEDBACK
the corresponding level of investigation works. 5 4 3 2 1

01 Did you find the presentations of the lecturers appropriate for the course?
If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

02 Did you find the presentations of the lecturers clear and sufficient?
If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

03 Did you find the lecture materials appropriate for the course?
If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

04 Did you find the lecture materials clear and sufficient?

If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

05 Which subject / lesson / topic did you find the most interesting and beneficial due to the learning
strategy employed by the instructor? (You may list one of more).

06 Which subject / lesson / topic did you find the least interesting and beneficial due to the learning
strategy employed by the instructor? (You may list one of more).
• Instructions: Please state your assessment of the
appropriateness of the method of instruction in
relation to the corresponding level of investigation
works, using the following scale:
• 5 – Strongly Agree (SA)
• 4 – Agree (A)
• 3 – Moderately Agree (MA)
• 2 – Disagree (D)
• 1 – Strongly Disagree (SD)
No. INDICATOR: Appropriateness of the method of instruction in relation to FEEDBACK
the corresponding level of investigation works. 5 4 3 2 1

01 Did you find the presentations of the lecturers appropriate for the course?
If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

02 Did you find the presentations of the lecturers clear and sufficient?
If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

03 Did you find the lecture materials appropriate for the course?
If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

04 Did you find the lecture materials clear and sufficient?

If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

05 Which subject / lesson / topic did you find the most interesting and beneficial due to the learning
strategy employed by the instructor? (You may list one of more).

06 Which subject / lesson / topic did you find the least interesting and beneficial due to the learning
strategy employed by the instructor? (You may list one of more).
• Instructions: Please state you assessment if the
administration of the course is properly conducted
in relation to the level of investigation works, using
the following scale:
• 5 – Strongly Agree (SA)
• 4 – Agree (A)
• 3 – Moderately Agree (MA)
• 2 – Disagree (D)
• 1 – Strongly Disagree (SD)
No. INDICATOR: Proper administration of the course in relation to the level of FEEDBACK
investigation works

5 4 3 2 1

01 Did you find the duration (period) of the program appropriate?

If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

02 Did you find the management of the training course appropriate?

If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

03 Did you find the orientation / briefing at the beginning to be clear, relevant and
appropriate?

If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:

04 Did you find the facilities sufficient and efficient?

If your answer is either 1 or 2, please briefly state your reasons and/or suggestions:
No. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS:
Please state briefly your analysis or evaluation for the following questions:

01 What is your general impression of the whole course?

02 In what areas will the whole course help improve your job performance?

03 Please provide other suggestions for improvement:

• Signature: _________________________________
End of Presentation and Good Day.