Sie sind auf Seite 1von 23

Chapter 3

Values, Attitudes,
and Job Satisfaction

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S
E L E V E N T H E D I T I O N
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. WWW.PRENHALL.COM/ROBBINS PowerPoint Presentation
All rights reserved. by Charlie Cook
OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter,
you should be able to:
1. Contrast terminal and instrumental values.
2. List the dominant values in today’s workforce.
3. Contrast the three components of an attitude.
LEARNING

4. Summarize the relationship between attitudes and


behavior.
5. Identify the role consistency plays in attitudes.
6. State the relationship between job satisfaction and
behavior.
7. Identify four employee responses to dissatisfaction

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–2


Values
Values
Basic convictions that a
specific mode of conduct or
end-state of existence is
personally or socially
preferable to an opposite or
converse mode of conduct or
end-state of existence.
Value System
A hierarchy based on a
ranking of an individual’s
values in terms of their
intensity.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–3
Attitudes
e s t a t e m e n t s –
Evaluativ l e –
r u n fa v o r a b
favorable o o r
e c ts , p e o p l e ,
a bout o bj e
r e fl e c t h o w o n
events;
b o u t s o m e t h i n g
feels a

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–4


Importance of Values

 Provide understanding of the attitudes,


motivation, and behaviors of individuals and
cultures.
 Influence our perception of the world around us.
 Represent interpretations of “right” and “wrong.”
 involve that some behaviors or outcomes are
preferred over others.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–5


Types of Values –- Rokeach Value Survey

Terminal Values
Desirable end-states of
existence; the goals that a
person would like to achieve
during his or her lifetime.

Instrumental Values
Preferable modes of
behavior or means of
achieving one’s terminal
values.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–6
Hofstede’s Framework for Assessing Cultures

Power Distance
The extent to which a society accepts
that power in institutions and
organizations is distributed unequally.

low distance: relatively equal distribution


high distance: extremely unequal
distribution

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–7


Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)
Individualism Collectivism
The degree to which A tight social
people prefer to act framework in which
as individuals rather people expect others in
than a member of groups of which they
groups. are a part to look after
them and protect
them.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–8


Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)

Achievement
The extent to which societal
values are characterized by
assertiveness, materialism
and competition.

Nurturing
The extent to which societal
values emphasize
relationships and concern
for others.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–9


Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)

Uncertainty Avoidance
The extent to which a society feels
threatened by uncertain and confusing
situations and tries to avoid them.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–10


Hofstede’s Framework (cont’d)

Long-term Orientation
A national culture attribute
that emphasizes the
future, economy, and
determination.

Short-term Orientation
A national culture attribute
that emphasizes the past
and present, respect for
tradition, and fulfilling social
obligations.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–11
Attitudes

Attitudes Cognitive component


The opinion or belief
Evaluative segment of an attitude.
statements
or Affective Component
judgments The emotional or feeling
concerning segment of an attitude.
objects,
people, or Behavioral Component
events. An intention to behave in a
certain way toward someone or
something.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–12


Job S at is fa cti on
o a n in d i v id u a l ’ s
Refers t th e
t i t u d e t o w a r d
ge ne r a l a t k o f
o p l e s p e a
job; when pe t e n
tt i t u d e s , o f
employee a
b s a t i s f a c t i o n
means jo

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–13


Types of Attitudes

Job Satisfaction

Job Involvement

Organizational Commitment

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–14


The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive Dissonance

Desire to reduce dissonance


• Importance of elements creating dissonance
• Degree of individual influence over elements
• Rewards involved in dissonance

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–15


Job Satisfaction

 Overall measures of satisfaction may be too broad:


current measures address different levels of job
satisfaction
 Overall job satisfaction rate has remained the same
for over 50 years
 When people say they are satisfied, they often mean
they are not dissatisfied!!

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–16


Personal Characteristics and Job Satisfaction

 Age: in general, increases with age


– Dis-satisfied have stopped working
– Older workers have greater chance of fulfillment
 Gender: uncertain results
 Race: whites are happier
 Cognitive Ability: slight negative relationship
between level of education and satisfaction

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–17


Personal Characteristics, Cont.
 Use of Skills
 Job similarity
 Personality: less alienation and internal locus of
control lead to higher satisfaction
 Occupational Level: the higher the status level
the greater the satisfaction

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–18


Low Satisfaction and Job Behavior

 Absenteeism: any given day 16-20% of workers


miss work. Costs businesses $30 billion dollars
a year

 Turnover: Not always a bad thing!


– Functional Turnover: when bad workers leave
– Dysfunctional Turnover: when good workers
leave

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–19


Factors Influence Job Satisfaction

 Opportunity: employees are more satisfied when they have


challenging opportunities at work.
 Stress: when negative stress is continuously high, job satisfaction is
low.
 Leadership: employees are more satisfied when their managers are
good leaders.
 Work Standards: employees are more satisfied when their entire
workgroup takes pride in the quality of its work.
 Fair Rewards: employees are more satisfied when they feel they are
rewarded fairly for the work they do.
 Adequate Authority: employees are more satisfied when they
have adequate freedom and authority to do their jobs.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–20


The Effect of Job Satisfaction on Employee
Performance

 Satisfaction and Productivity

 Satisfaction and Absenteeism

 Satisfaction and Turnover

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–21


How Employees Can Express Dissatisfaction

Exit Voice
Behavior directed Active and
toward leaving the constructive attempts
organization. to improve
conditions.
Loyalty Neglect
Passively waiting for Allowing conditions
conditions to improve. to worsen.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–22


Job Satisfaction and Customer Satisfaction
 Satisfied employees increase customer
satisfaction

 Dissatisfied customers increase employee job


dissatisfaction.

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 3–23

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen