Sie sind auf Seite 1von 19

FUTURE OF NUCLEAR

ENERGY IN PAKISTAN

KHALID M. BUKHARI
DIRECTOR
KARACHI INSTITUTE OF POWER
ENGINEERING
PRESENT STATUS OF ENERGY
CONSUMPTION IN PAKISTAN
PROJECTED REQUIREMENTS
POSSIBLE SOURCES OF ENERGY

• COAL • HYDRO
• OIL • SOLAR
• GAS • WIND
• NUCLEAR • GEOTHERMAL
WORLD TRENDS – TOTAL ENERGY
CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT
SOURCES IN PAKISTAN
WORLD TRENDS - ELECTRICITY
DIFFERENT SOURCES FOR ELECTRIC
POWER – PAKISTAN AND WORLD

PAKISTAN WORLD
BASIS FOR SELECTION OF DIFFERENT
SOURCES
• Availability of plant
• Availability and assured supply of fuel
• Cost of electricity
• Proven technology
• Effects on environment
• “Energy independence”
ENERGY MIX
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Basic components of all thermal stations:


heat source, boiler, turbine, generator,
condenser.
Other components: pumps, piping,
instrumentation, controllers, …..

Heat sink (for condenser), electrical grid


network to feed the power.
THERMAL VS NUCLEAR PLANT

• Primary difference is the heat source.


• Instead of hot flue gases, the nuclear fuel usually heats
water at high pressure, that in turn boils a secondary
water which is at a lower pressure.
• Radioactivity: requires protective measures
• Decay heat: requires cooling even after shutdown.
• Larger number of systems: complex design.
• Additional instrumentation: for radioactivity, neutron flux
etc.
• More serious consequences in the event of a major
accident. Therefore, safety is of primary concern.
THERMAL VS NUCLEAR PLANT

NUCLEAR CONVENTIONAL

CONSTRUCTION TIME 5 -6 years 2 -3 years

CAPITAL COST 3500 + 1000 +


USD / KWe

FUEL COST LOW HIGH

O%M COST MODERATE LOW


TYPES OF NPP
BASED ON FUEL TYPE:
• NATURAL URANIUM (KANUPP)
• ENRICHED URANIUM (CHASNUPP)

BASED ON COOLANT TYPE


• LIGHT WATER (CHASNUPP)
• HEAVY WATER (KANUPP)
• GAS
• LIQUID METAL
REQUIREMENTS TO BUILD AND
SUSTAIN NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAM
• Fuel supply (uranium, enrichment if
needed)
• Industrial base or vendor support
• Large load centres
• Trained manpower
PRESENT STATUS IN PAKISTAN

• Entire fuel cycle


• Weak industrial base – need reliable
vendor
• Sufficient trained manpower and training
capacity
FUTURE PLANS
ENERGY POLICY TARGET FOR 2030:

To have 8800 MWe of nuclear electricity


CURRENT STATUS
• KANUPP (125 MWe) OPERATIONAL SINCE
1972
• CHASNUPP-1 (300 MWe) OPERATIONAL
SINCE 2002
• CHASNUPP-2 (300 MWe) UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
• CHASNUPP-3 AND -4 (300 MWe each) IN
NEGOTIATION PHASE
• KANUPP-2 (1000 MWe) PLANNED AFTER C-3
AND C-4
.

Thank you

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen