Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
We cant just make any hardware with out studying its behavior or characteristics. HFSS from Ansoft corp. provides that platform, where we can design the prototype,and then study its behavior and observe its characteristics and then keeping them in mind fabricate our hardware.
1
The acronym stands for High Frequency Structural Simulator. It is one of the most popular and powerful applications used for antenna design, and the design of complex RF electronic circuits in the industry.
Major users of this software for rnd purposes are Ericsson ,Nokia etc.
Introduction to HFSS
As we know the length of a half-wave dipole antenna should be half the wavelength of the operating carrier wave frequency. Thus the dipole modeled in HFSS has the following specifications
Wavelength
1.5m
/2
0.75m
0.375m
The following figure shows the complete geometry of the dipole antenna on HFSS.
Radiation Pattern
The computed 3-Dimensional pattern radiation pattern of the of the radiation is as modeled dipole follows antenna is as follows.
The E-fields determines the type of polarization . The electric and magnetic fields of the modeled dipole antenna are shown.
A Microstrip Patch Antenna consists of a metallic strip or a patch mounted on a dielectric layer (substrate) supported by ground plane.
The micro strip patch is designed so its pattern maximum is normal to the patch hence making it a broadside radiator. The conducting micro strip or patch and the ground plane are separated by a substrate. There are numerous substrates that can be used for the design of micro strip antennas and their dielectric constants are usually in the range of (2.2 to 12).
10
There are many configurations that can be used to feed microstrip antennas. There are three most common structures that are used to feed planar printed antennas Feeding techniques are given below. Coaxial probe feeds Microstrip line feeds Aperture coupled feeds
11
12
The Coaxial feed or probe feed is a very common technique used for feeding Microstrip patch antennas. The inner conductor of the coaxial connector extends through the dielectric and is soldered to the radiating patch, while the outer conductor is connected to the ground plane
13
14
For the modeling of Micro Strip Patch antenna, a paper of IEEE was kept as a reference paper.
Application of Three-Dimensional FiniteDifference Time Domain Method of the Analysis of Planar Micro strip Circuits by David M.Sheen ,Sami M.Ali, Jin AU. Kong was repulbished.
15
The antenna mentioned in the IEEE papers follows a strip line feed.
Substrate used Duroid Dielectric constant given Thickness of the Substrate Length of the Patch Width of the Patch Strip line feed 2.2
Following table shows the entire data about the Micro Strip Patch antenna.
16
17
Return loss graph of our modeled antenna was compared to that of the one given in the IEEE paper. The main purpose of this comparison was to authenticate the behavior of the return loss graph given in the IEEE paper and that of the modeling software which is HFSS .
18
19
The results clearly showed that the behavior of the return loss graphs of both the antennas are almost similar.
Now after gaining confidence on the patch design we moved forward to our next part of the project that was to model and then fabricate a prob feed Patch Antenna
20
21
Mathematical calculations were carried out for the dimensions of our Prob Feed Patch Antenna, at frequency of 1.8GHz.
Calculations, carried out for the Patch are as under.
22
Substituting c = 3x108 m/s r = 4.4 fo = 1.8 GHz We calculated the width and it came out to be W=50.77mm
23
Substituting r = 4.4, W = 50.77 mm and h = 1.6 mm we get: We get the effective dielectric constant as
reff =4.14
24
Substituting the mentioned values as reff = 8.79 c = 3e8 m/s f o = 1.8 GHz we get
Leff =40.9mm
25
26
The actual length of the patch can now be calculated via the following
Substituting the values in the above formula as Leff = 24 mm L = 7.5 e-4 mm we get
27
As mentioned earlier that the results are the same if the size of ground plane is greater than the patch dimensions by approximately six times the substrate thickness all around the periphery. For a larger element size we took the ground plane approximately twelve times the substrate thickness
28
G10 FIBER GLASS (FR4) 4.4 40.1mm 50.77mm 1.6mm COAXIAL FEED LINEAR.
29
30
Return loss
31
7dB
32
33
The VSWR of our antenna came out to be 1.25 at a resonant frequency if 1.76 GHz
34
Finding the Ideal Feed Point Location Minimum Return Loss will decide the coordinates of feed point
(x,y)
35
( 0,0 )
( 0,-1 )
36
( 0,-2 )
(0,-2)
( 0,-3 )
(0,-3)
37
( 0,-4 )
-4
( 0,-5 )
-5
38
( 0,-6 ) -6
( 0,-7 )
-7
39
( 0,-8 ) -8
( 0,-9 )
-9
40
( 0,-11 )
( 0 , -11 )
41
S.No 1 2 3 4 5 6
Center Return loss frequency(GHz) (dB) 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76 -0.07 -0.33 -0.75 -1.89 -2.02 -4.98
7
8 9 10 11 12
(0,-6)
(0,-7) (0,-8) (0,-9) (0,-10) (0,-11)
1.76
1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76
-7.34
-9.55 -14 -19.79 -21.45 -24.83
42
After the modeling of the probe feed patch antenna and achieving satisfactory results we came to our fabrication part.
Fabrication Procedure
For this purpose we etched two antennas. To learn how patch antennas are built we constructed one antenna ourselves
In order to get more accurate results we got one antenna etched from Allied electronics Lahore.
43
44
45
A network analyzer is an instrument used to analyze the properties of electrical networks, especially those properties associated with the reflection and transmission of electrical signals known as scattering parameters (S-parameters).
Network analyzers are used mostly at high frequencies
Network Analyzer
46
The following figure was obtained from the vector network analyzer. The figure shows the return loss graph of the patch antenna we fabricated. The results came out to be outstanding. Well beyond our expectations. The return loss graph showed that the return loss at 1.82 GHz is -30.261 dB
47
The following figure shows the Voltage standing wave ratio of our patch antenna. The VSWR of any working antenna should not exceed 2. In our case the result came out to be very outstanding. At the resonant frequency of 1.82GHz the VSWR comes out to be 1.0840.
48
49
50
As we progressed with the passage of time we had to face challenges in different ways. If they wouldnt have been solved timely we could not have achieved our goal. A brief review of difficulties during the whole project are summarized below. Unavailability of HFSS Very few people having knowledge of soft ware, so finding an instructor of this field was difficult and time consuming. Lack of antenna testing educational institutes. equipment in any of the
People who had knowledge of network analyzer at comsats were busy with there own university commitments so taking some time from them also became an isssue. This problem was solved after requesting to Dr.Shahid A.Khan Dean comsats who requested the concerned person to help us.
51