Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Biomedical
Microtechnology
and
Nanotechnology
Microfabrication and Nanofabrication
applied to Biomedical Instrumentation
Why Micro/Nano ?
SCALING OF PARAMETERS
The values of various parameters depends on the dimensions of the system
and this proves to be helpful in a number of cases.
Mass
Mass = Density x Volume = Constant x S3
Therefore mass goes down (104)3 or is reduced 1012 times as the original beam
d= =
3EI Ebt 3 thickness
breadth
Young’s Modulus
Moment of Inertia
Force will vary with cross-sectional area if the stress is to be kept constant
Therefore, deflection is proportional to S1. Therefore, the same stress is
generated in the two models if the deflection in the microcantilever is 10-4
times the deflection in the macro model, thus maintaining the bending shape.
A much smaller force can be sensed (10-8 times) with the micro cantilever.
Why Micro/Nano ?
SCALING OF PARAMETERS
Frequency
Frequency scales as the square root of the ratio of the stiffness and
mass. Thus, frequency scales as S-1. Hence, micro and nano
applications can be high frequency applications.
Reference :
http://www.bu.edu/nems/SiC%20high%20frequency%20Henry.pdf
Why Micro/Nano ?
SCALING OF PARAMETERS
Example : Capacitor (Electrical Parameters)
If the same electric field E = 108 V/m needs to be mainitained between
the plates of a micro sized capacitor and a macro sized capacitor, then
Voltage
Voltage = E x gap
Thus, voltage will scale as the gap between the plates. Therefore a
much smaller voltage will be required in the micro case to produce the
same effect.
+V
gap
gnd
Why Micro/Nano ?
SCALING OF PARAMETERS
Electrostatic Force
Electrostatic force = Area x (electrostatic field)2
Thus, electrostatic force scales as S2 if electrostatic field is maintained same.
However, if voltage is to be maintained same, electrostatic force would be
independent of scaling. However, its effect in the micro case would be more
pronounced because relatively, inertial forces are very low.
Electromagnetic force scales as S4 if magnetic field is to be constant and thus,
the world of mems relies on electrostatic motors as opposed to electromagnetic
motors .
Capacitance
Capacitance scales as S1.
Why Micro/Nano ?
SCALING OF PARAMETERS
Stent Procedure
and
Stent Procedure
Balloon Angioplasty
http://www.med.umich.edu/1libr/aha/aha_dil http://www.mdmercy.com/vascular/discoveries/bal
ation_art.htm
Micro/Nano applied to BME
Doping Methods
2. Diffusion
Dopants are diffused thermally into the
substrate in furnace at 950 – 1280 0C.
It is governed by Fick’s Laws of Diffusion.
2. Ion Implantation
Dopant ions bombarded into targeting
substrate by high energy.
Ion implantation are able to place any ion at
any depth in sample.
Additive Processes
Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD)
1. Evaporation
Deposition is achieved by evaporation
or sublimation of heated metal onto
substrate.
This can be done either by resistance
heating or by e-beam bombardment.
Thermal Evaporator
Additive Processes
Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD)
2. Sputtering
Types of CVD
LPCVD (Low Pressure CVD), PECVD (Plasma Enhanced CVD)
Salient Features
CVD results depend on pressure, gas, and temperature
Can be diffusion or reaction limited
Varies from film composition, crystallization, deposition rate and electrical and
mechanical properties
Subtractive Processes
Dry Etching
1. Dry Chemical Etching
HF Etching
HF is a powerful etchant and hence, highly dangerous.
XeF2 Etching
2XeF2+Si→2Xe+SiF4
Isotropic etching (typically 1-3µm/min)
Does not attack aluminum, silicon dioxide, and silicon nitride
Subtractive Processes
Dry Etching
Plasma Etching
Reaction Mechanism
Produce reactive species in gas-phase Reactive species diffuse to the solid
Adsorption, and diffuse over the surface Reaction Desorption Diffusion
Subtractive Processes
Dry Etching
3. Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE)
A very high-aspect-ratio silicon etch method
(usually > 30:1)
BOSCH Process
Etch rate is 1.5 – 4 µm/min
SF6 to etch silicon
Approx. 10nm flourcarbon polymer (similar
is plasma deposited using C4H8
Energetic ions (SF6+) remove protective
polymer at the bottom trench
Subtractive Processes
Mass
Mass = Density x Volume = Constant x S3
Therefore mass goes down (104)3 or is reduced 1012 times as the original beam
d= =
3EI Ebt 3 thickness
breadth
Young’s Modulus
Moment of Inertia
Force will vary with cross-sectional area if the stress is to be kept constant
Therefore, deflection is proportional to S1. Therefore, the same stress is
generated in the two models if the deflection in the microcantilever is 10-4
times the deflection in the macro model, thus maintaining the bending shape.
A much smaller force can be sensed (10-8 times) with the micro cantilever.
Why Micro/Nano ?
SCALING OF PARAMETERS
Frequency
Frequency scales as the square root of the ratio of the stiffness and
mass. Thus, frequency scales as S-1. Hence, micro and nano
applications can be high frequency applications.
Reference :
http://www.bu.edu/nems/SiC%20high%20frequency%20Henry.pdf
Why Micro/Nano ?
SCALING OF PARAMETERS
Example : Capacitor (Electrical Parameters)
If the same electric field E = 108 V/m needs to be mainitained between
the plates of a micro sized capacitor and a macro sized capacitor, then
Voltage
Voltage = E x gap
Thus, voltage will scale as the gap between the plates. Therefore a
much smaller voltage will be required in the micro case to produce the
same effect.
+V
gap
gnd
Why Micro/Nano ?
SCALING OF PARAMETERS
Electrostatic Force
Electrostatic force = Area x (electrostatic field)2
Thus, electrostatic force scales as S2 if electrostatic field is maintained same.
However, if voltage is to be maintained same, electrostatic force would be
independent of scaling. However, its effect in the micro case would be more
pronounced because relatively, inertial forces are very low.
Electromagnetic force scales as S4 if magnetic field is to be constant and thus,
the world of mems relies on electrostatic motors as opposed to electromagnetic
motors .
Capacitance
Capacitance scales as S1.
Why Micro/Nano ?
SCALING OF PARAMETERS
Stent Procedure
and
Stent Procedure
Balloon Angioplasty
http://www.med.umich.edu/1libr/aha/aha_dil http://www.mdmercy.com/vascular/discoveries/bal
ation_art.htm
Micro/Nano applied to BME
Doping Methods
2. Diffusion
Dopants are diffused thermally into the
substrate in furnace at 950 – 1280 0C.
It is governed by Fick’s Laws of Diffusion.
2. Ion Implantation
Dopant ions bombarded into targeting
substrate by high energy.
Ion implantation are able to place any ion at
any depth in sample.
Additive Processes
Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD)
1. Evaporation
Deposition is achieved by evaporation
or sublimation of heated metal onto
substrate.
This can be done either by resistance
heating or by e-beam bombardment.
Thermal Evaporator
Additive Processes
Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD)
2. Sputtering
Types of CVD
LPCVD (Low Pressure CVD), PECVD (Plasma Enhanced CVD)
Salient Features
CVD results depend on pressure, gas, and temperature
Can be diffusion or reaction limited
Varies from film composition, crystallization, deposition rate and electrical and
mechanical properties
Subtractive Processes
Dry Etching
1. Dry Chemical Etching
HF Etching
HF is a powerful etchant and hence, highly dangerous.
XeF2 Etching
2XeF2+Si→2Xe+SiF4
Isotropic etching (typically 1-3µm/min)
Does not attack aluminum, silicon dioxide, and silicon nitride
Subtractive Processes
Dry Etching
Plasma Etching
Reaction Mechanism
Produce reactive species in gas-phase Reactive species diffuse to the solid
Adsorption, and diffuse over the surface Reaction Desorption Diffusion
Subtractive Processes
Dry Etching
3. Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE)
A very high-aspect-ratio silicon etch method
(usually > 30:1)
BOSCH Process
Etch rate is 1.5 – 4 µm/min
SF6 to etch silicon
Approx. 10nm flourcarbon polymer (similar
is plasma deposited using C4H8
Energetic ions (SF6+) remove protective
polymer at the bottom trench
Subtractive Processes
B
F
C G
D H
Reference :
http://www.acreo.se/acreo-rd/IMAGES/PUBLICATIONS/PROCEEDINGS/ABSTRACT-
KINDLUNDH.PDF
Multi-electrode Neural
Recording
Reference :
http://www.cyberkineticsinc.com/technology.htm
Reference :
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/neuronal-networks/mmep.htm
Intraocular Stimulation
Electrodes
Reference : Lutz Hesse, Thomas Schanze, Marcus Wilms and Marcus Eger, “Implantation of retina stimulation
electrodes and recording of electrical stimulation responses in the visual cortex of the cat”, Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp
Ophthalmol (2000) 238:840–845