Chapter 5

Economic Solutions to Environmental Problems: The Market Approach

2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western

Descriptive Overview
Market approach an incentive-based policy that encourages conservative practices or pollution reduction strategies
Difference between market approach and commandand-control approach is how each approach attempts to achieve its objectives

Descriptive Overview
Identifying Types of Market Instruments
Pollution charge Subsidies Deposit/refund systems Pollution permit trading systems

Pollution Charges
Pollution charge a fee that varies with the amount of pollutants released
Polluter-pays principle Product charge a fee added to the price of a pollution-generating product based on its quantity or some attribute responsible for pollution

Pollution Charges
Modeling a Product Charge as a Per Unit Tax
Policy motivation of a product charge is to induce firms to internalize the externality by taking account of the MEC in their production decisions Pigouvian tax a unit charge on a good whose production generates a negative externality such that the charge equals the MEC at QE Assessing the Model Difficult to identify the dollar value of MEC at QE Model implicitly allows only for an output reduction to abate pollution
5

Pollution Charges
Figure 5.1 Implementation of a Pigouvian Tax to Achieve Efficiency

Pollution Charges
Modeling an Emission Charge: Single-Polluter Case
Emission or effluent charge a fee imposed directly on the actual discharge of pollution Assessing the Model Emission charge stimulates the natural economic incentives of the polluter

Pollution Charges
Figure 5.2 Modeling an Emission Charge for a Single Firm

Pollution Charges
Figure 5.3 Effect of Technology Improvement on a Firms Least-Cost Decision Making

Pollution Charges
Modeling an Emission Charge: Multi-Polluter Case
Assessing the Model Emission charge exploits each polluters natural incentive to pursue a least-cost strategy Low-cost abaters do most of the cleaning up and highcost abaters pay more in taxes to cover the greater damages they cost Potential increase in monitoring costs Part of tax burden is shared with consumers in form of higher prices

10

Pollution Charges
Figure 5.4 Effect of an Emission Charge in a Two-Polluter Model

11

Pollution Charges
Pollution Charges In Practice
Internationally, pollution charge is most commonly used market-based instrument Several countries use effluent charges to control the noise pollution generated by aircraft Real-world application of the product charge is one levied on lubricant oils by Finland, Hungary, and Italy

12

Environmental Subsidies
Two major types of subsidies:
Abatement equipment subsidies Pollution reduction subsidies

13

Environmental Subsidies
Modeling an Abatement Equipment Subsidy
Abatement equipment subsidy a payment aimed at lowering the cost of abatement technology Attempts to internalize the positive externality associated with the consumption of abatement activities Pigouvian subsidy a per unit payment on a good whose consumption generates a positive externality such that the payment equals the MEB at QE Assessing the model
Difficulty measuring the MEB May bias polluters decisions about how best to abate
14

Environmental Subsidies
Modeling a Per Unit Subsidy on Pollution Reduction
Per unit subsidy on pollution reduction a payment for every unit of pollution removed below some predetermined level Assessing the Model Might be less disruptive than an equipment subsidy Can have perverse effect of elevating pollution levels in the aggregate

15

Environmental Subsidies
Environmental Subsidies in Practice
Internationally, many countries offer environmental subsidies in the form of grants or low-interest loans In the United States, the most common use is federal funding for publicly owned treatment works

16

Deposit/Refund Systems
Deposit/refund system a market instrument that imposes an up-front charge to pay for potential damages and refunds it for returning a product for proper disposal or recycling
Combines the incentive characteristic of a pollution charge with a built-in mechanism for controlling monitoring costs

17

Deposit/Refund Systems
Economics of Deposit/refund Systems
Intended to force the potential polluter to account for both the marginal private cost (MPC) and the marginal external cost (MEC) of improper waste disposal Targets the potential polluter instead of penalizing the actual polluter

18

Deposit/Refund Systems
Modeling a Deposit/Refund System
Deposit serves the same function as a pollution charge with the critical difference that the refund helps to deter improper waste disposal Assessing the Model Encourages environmentally responsible behavior without adding to monitoring and compliance costs Can be used to encourage more efficient use of raw materials

19

Deposit/Refund Systems
Figure 5.5 A Pigouvian Subsidy in the Market for Scrubbers

20

Deposit/Refund Systems
Deposit/Refund Systems in Practice
Beverage container disposal Disposal of used tire, car hulks, and lead-acid batteries

21

Deposit/Refund Systems
Figure 5.6 Modeling a Deposit/Refund System in the Market for
Waste Disposal

22

Pollution Permit Trading Systems

Pollution permit trading system a market instrument that establishes a market for rights to pollute by issuing tradeable pollution credits or allowances
Pollution credits tradeable permits issued for emitting below an established standard Pollution allowances tradeable permits that indicate the maximum level of pollution that may be released

23

Pollution Permit Trading Systems

Structure of a Pollution Trading Systems
Two components: The issuance of some fixed number of permits in a region A provision for trading these permits among polluting sources within that region Bargaining gives rise to a market for pollution rights

24

Pollution Permit Trading Systems

Modeling a Pollution Permit System for Multiple Polluters
Incentive to trade as long as two firms face different MAC levels Trading will continue until the incentive to do so no longer exists, at which point, the cost-effective solution is obtained Assessing the Model Trading establishes the price of a right to pollute without intervention No tax revenues are generated Trading system is more flexible
25

Pollution Permit Trading Systems

Pollution Trading Systems in Practice
Still in early stages of development Few international examples In the United States, Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 establish an allowance-based trading program to control sulfur dioxide emissions

26